Jump to content

Umpire Scorecard Thread


Can_of_corn

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, justD said:

Just to clarify, +31 and -5  are the number of runs 'given' or 'taken away' for the overall season as a result of missed calls?

If so, the numbers seem pretty significant, especially for NYY and CLE

Is there any calculation that equates runs with wins to see about how many extra wins the Yankees have been gifted by umpires this year? 31 extra runs feels like it would correspond to 6-8 extra wins but I have no idea how the math would come out.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, ShoelesJoe said:

I don't think there's anything subconscious about it. Umpires know that if they make a bad call against the Yankees Boone will go balrog, and it'll be the top story on every sports cast and social media site for the next 48 hours. So umps just give them most of the close calls to avoid the hassle. 

Marmol is #1 in ejections in the NL but that doesn't seem to be doing them any good in umpire bias. Vogt just got his first ejection arguing a balk call on 8/9 so it appears a mild mannered manager can still get the umps on their side. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Yep, that's what they mean.   Umpire subconscious bias, or catcher framing skills?   You decide.

I think it has less to do with framing and more to do with umpires who are not good at their jobs.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, LookitsPuck said:

Austin Wells and Jose Trevino are the #3 and #4 best pitch framers in all of baseball. The two of them have saved 19 runs (Catcher Framing Runs).

Adley? #48

McCann? #50

Adley and McCann are worth -9 runs. That's a 28 run swing. If you believe 10 runs = 1 win, that's basically a 3 win difference between the teams just on framing alone.

That explains it all to me. 

But that’s a fait accomplis.  If the umpires give the Yankees pitchers the calls, the catchers will get credited with good framing whether they did anything or not.   So like I said, is it good framing, or bias?

Now, I’ll say this: Ump Scorecard breaks down whether it’s the hitters or the pitchers who are getting the breaks.   For the Yankees, their hitters are +3.2 while their pitchers are +27.5.   If it was just pro-Yankee bias, you’d expect both their hitters and pitchers would be getting the calls to roughly the same extent.   So, the fact that the Yankees pitchers are much more favored than their hitters suggests that framing is a big factor.  

By the way, the O’s batters are -7.1 and the pitchers are +2.2.   But remember, umpires favor pitchers generally.  The median team score is roughly +5 for pitchers and -5 for batters. So, Yankees pitchers do about 22 runs better than an average team, and the batters do 8 runs better, when it comes to getting calls.   

The O’s batters are -7.1 (about 2 runs worse than average) and pitchers are +2.2 (3 runs worse than average).

 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, ShoelesJoe said:

Is there any calculation that equates runs with wins to see about how many extra wins the Yankees have been gifted by umpires this year? 31 extra runs feels like it would correspond to 6-8 extra wins but I have no idea how the math would come out.  

Very roughly, 10 runs = 1 win.  So, 3 wins.  But obviously, not all runs are created equal when it comes to impacting a specific game.  Some games are close and a bad call can heavily influence the outcome, other games aren’t close at all and a bad call is inconsequential even if it leads to some runs.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Frobby said:

But that’s a fait accomplis.  If the umpires give the Yankees pitchers the calls, the catchers will get credited with good framing whether they did anything or not.   So like I said, is it good framing, or bias?

Now, I’ll say this: Ump Scorecard breaks down whether it’s the hitters or the pitchers who are getting the breaks.   For the Yankees, their hitters are +3.2 while their pitchers are +27.5.   If it was just pro-Yankee bias, you’d expect both their hitters and pitchers would be getting the calls to roughly the same extent.   So, the fact that the Yankees pitchers are much more favored than their hitters suggests that framing is a big factor.  

By the way, the O’s batters are -7.1 and the pitchers are +2.2.   But remember, umpires favor pitchers generally.  The median team score is roughly +5 for pitchers and -5 for batters. So, Yankees pitchers do about 22 runs better than an average team, and the batters do 8 runs better, when it comes to getting calls.   

The O’s batters are -7.1 (about 2 runs worse than average) and pitchers are +2.2 (3 runs worse than average).

 

Read the room, Frob.  People just want to believe that the Yankees get calls that benefit them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Moose Milligan said:

Read the room, Frob.  People just want to believe that the Yankees get calls that benefit them.

The facts say that the Yankees DO get calls that benefit them. The question being asked is why. Is it random chance or design? Over the last four years the Yankees are averaging +18 runs gifted them by home plate umpires. To put that in perspective only two teams (one of them the Yankees of course) out of thirty have been gifted that many runs this season. To average that kind of benefit over a four year span is extraordinary I would think.  

The best year for the Orioles was a +4 runs in 2023, but we averaged -9 runs total over four years. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • The facts say that the Yankees DO get calls that benefit them. The question being asked is why. Is it random chance or design? Over the last four years the Yankees are averaging +18 runs gifted them by home plate umpires. To put that in perspective only two teams (one of them the Yankees of course) out of thirty have been gifted that many runs this season. To average that kind of benefit over a four year span is extraordinary I would think.   The best year for the Orioles was a +4 runs in 2023, but we averaged -9 runs total over four years. 
    • Povich at OPACY is tempting to me too. On the road, I’d go Suarez without hesitation though. 
    • LOL I actually found that on YouTube and started doing it the remainder of the game when we struck out MFYs.  hahahahhaaa  😈😈😈
    • It was a strong answer after the '96 Jeffrey Maier shenanigans. The '96 NYY championship over the Braves was kind of an upset at that time, and these two years we didn't really know what the '98-'00 Yankees were about to become. I mean, I don't think Rocky Coppinger's teams would have gone on to beat Mariano Rivera's teams over the long haul, but I have an easy pick for a 1-use time machine to (minimally reasonably) right a wrong.      Can we please re-simulate the late 90's for Ripken, Mussina, Benitez and Jeter if that 0/30 parks batted ball didn't cost the Orioles the 2 road wins they very nearly earned to open the series?
    • Grayson's start was not delayed last year, I was at game 2 and it was a crisp clear day all day leading up to first pitch.
    • I see Adley had a good time enjoying clinchmas just like last year.  Hope he has access to Gatorade in the dugout.
    • Hi Malike-it's great to have you back!!   As an Orioles fan I'm not sure I find anything so parochial like that so annoying but I do have to admit it is a brilliant marketing tactic-classic transference of a positive emotion (a K) to a brand.  They do pay but it's likely part of larger sponsorship agreement (signage, event branding, suites, tickets)-and what PC Richard pays directly may be less than you think.  Retailers can sometimes leverage their vendors (electronics and white goods manufacturer's) local or national funds-the Yankees provide almost national exposure.   It's not just the population exposure that the NY market provides-it's also the amount of consumer product companies chiefly and other larger companies with HQ/presence there.  The Yankees like it/or not offer unique exposure and entertainment opportunities other market's can't provide.      
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...