Jump to content

Does getting Pie change our draft strategy a bit?


Recommended Posts

Say we are torn between drafting an OF'er or a SP with the 5th pick--does getting Pie now tip the scale in favor of a SP?

Say we liked Dustin Ackley (or Donovan Tate), and equally, we liked Matzek and its a coin flip between who we'd go for.

All things being equal, do we go with pitching now that we have Pie, especially if he supplants our expectations this season?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Say we are torn between drafting an OF'er or a SP with the 5th pick--does getting Pie now tip the scale in favor of a SP?

Say we liked Dustin Ackley (or Donovan Tate), and equally, we liked Matzek and its a coin flip between who we'd go for.

All things being equal, do we go with pitching now that we have Pie, especially if he supplants our expectations this season?

It should not. The guys you draft at the five spot are 2-5 years out if they develop. To use current MLB need to define who you draft would be foolish. It just does not make much sense. I know one prominent poster declared this will mean we draft a SP because "he would be ready in 1-2 years." Reality does not validate that statement.

Anyway that is my read and if Andy comes out, saying it changes the draft strategy. I'll be the first one calling him a fool. I doubt the front office will do this. This is something Angelos would do. i.e. Don't draft Chris Nelson because we have Miguel Tejada.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It should not. The guys you draft at the five spot are 2-5 years out if they develop. To use current MLB need to define who you draft would be foolish. It just does not make much sense. I know one prominent poster declared this will mean we draft a SP because "he would be ready in 1-2 years." Reality does not validate that statement.

Anyway that is my read and if Andy comes out, saying it changes the draft strategy. I'll be the first one calling him a fool. I doubt the front office will do this. This is something Angelos would do. i.e. Don't draft Chris Nelson because we have Miguel Tejada.

Steven Drew or Jared Weaver would be nice to have on the Orioles now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Steven Drew or Jared Weaver would be nice to have on the Orioles now.

That was all Boras avoidance though, if we hadn't been boycotting dealing with him we would most likely have one of them.

I don't think Pie affects our draft strategy, you take best talent available and work it out later, but that being said I think our plan is very pitching-centric and it is going to take quite a prospect for us to not take one of the pitchers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think it affects our strategy at all.

1. We don't know what Pie will become. He has to demonstrate he can hit at the ML level.

2. A team in need is a team indeed like the Orioles. We need best player available in the eyes of the FO / Jordan

and finally

3. I think the team has a fetish for pitching unless a positional player falls to them (ie: Green). Based on today, I would guess we'll take Crow given his potential for a shorter path to the majors than, say, a high schooler.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • If the bolded is true, they are most likely talking to someone (if not Gunnar - Adley). Rubenstein is no idiot (like John Angelos was). He knows that the long term viability from a business standpoint is not in allowing #35 and #2 get away and go elsewhere. For those who have been to games this season, it is clear to see from all of those jerseys around the stadium who the fans have fallen in love with. Extensions are standard operating procedure in MLB currently (even for the lowest budget teams not name Athletics). The Orioles under JA were operating as an outlier. That trend is very unlikely to continue under Rubenstien. He appears to care too much to allow that to happen. IMO the Orioles must retain at least one of Gunnar or Adley AND others if they want to grow their fanbase in the market. You have to have a face or 2 of the franchise to sell and for people to continue to come see and fall in love with. Long gone are the days when people are simply loyal to institutions. 
    • Oriole doctors told him they will re-examine him in 2 weeks...and if the X-rays are encouraging, he could start a rehab assignment and could be back playing for Norfolk..mid June...instead of Mid July.               Coby is not in any pain, but the rib has to heal. Remember, Bellinger had two broken ribs, and began playing after just 2 weeks. I think we could see Mayo , assuming he's hitting again, with the Orioles in June.Elias told Coby that it was just a matter of days before he was brought to Baltimore..and then that same day, with Elias in the stands...Coby chased a pop up, fell into the dugout and broke a rib...really bad luck..
    • Jorge is a speeding bullet, Gunnar is runaway freight train. 
    • I think Baumann is the better pitcher than Perez...I guess they need the lefty..but Baumann, when he's decent can go extended innings too...I hope he clears waivers,,,but he wont be. He might even start for someone someday...
    • Big picture - there has been a lot of concern expressed on this board that Elias will hoard marginal players like McKenna and Bauman at the expense of team competitiveness. Whether or not you agree on the specifics of the move, it should assuage any such hoarding concerns.
    • Yeah, I assume they've been looking at the data closely. I would have preferred Perez being DFA'd but I put my reasoning why he's probably not the one to go in a post above, even if I think it was a bad reason.
    • For two years we talked about 7+ run leads possibly not being Baumann proof. I probably would have DFA'd Perez first, but I don't fault them here. They needed to get rid of someone and he was one of the two least reliable options out of the pen. I guess Perez got the LHP hard thrower advantage, even though he's not good.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...