Jump to content

Sun 4/16 @ White Sox -- Will they play?


Spy Fox

Recommended Posts

Just now, sportsfan8703 said:

I’m upset with Grayson, but I gotta say… I love that inning. He was mad. He was on the mound ready to rock and fire. He didn’t give up. 

He should be mad, he crapped the bed once again in the first inning of a game.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Billy F-Face3 said:

If we want a long term staple of the pitching rotation, there will be early growing pains. Even the best  pitchers in baseball history had some growing pains.

True, and the same thing is true of most hitters. But the best times to live through those growing pains are when you have a bad or mediocre team that's taking its lumps, or when you can add a new-to-MLB strong prospect to an established rotation of starters who can pitch a lot of innings and, on occasion, start  out of turn to avoid starting the new guy against certain teams. Looking to GRod to learn on the job and be one of the anchors of a weak staff is pretty risky.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

Tampa signs their young talent long term and has been great and developing or acquiring talent players to surround their core. They are not risk adverse like Elias is.

Elias and Hyde are very comfortable as they are given "who know how long contracts" from an owner who is very comfortable just making money.

If the O's pitching doesn't turn around, Elias is going to have an opportunity at the deadline to acquire pitching. If that is the case, hopefully some of the position regulars are playing so well that we acquire studs and not also-rans

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

Watching the amount of poor first innings from our starters as well how many inherited runners have scored, makes me wonder if this coaching staff gets their pitchers ready correctly. 

 

 

Maybe the issue from last year is that our pitchers are calling the game and not Adley?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Why does everybody want to jump and label a kid so fast? What is this, his 2nd major-league season? Yes, certainly they shouldn't go into next year thinking he's a lock for 30+ starts and 180-200 innings but we can't say he's already reached his peak either. 
    • And their defense is very good. To put things in perspective, the Tigers collective dWAR is +0.5. The Orioles is -2.8. Minnesota -4.1, Yankees -0.3, Houston -0.1, Seattle +2.0, Royals at +2.5. The Royals really standout as most of that value is driven by Fermin (catcher) and Witt.  But I think my point is that the Tigers have excellent pitching (starting pitching and bullpen) as well as excellent defense. And they're not putrid with the bats.  I would say the one saving grace about the Tigers is they don't run much. 
    • We could have easily swept Detroit in Baltimore, the lineup we have now is not the lineup they faced. It doesn't matter who the opponent is, just win.
    • Both of them are important to consider here. They could have a mediocre offense every single game of the season, but if the pitching is elite (and it is!), it'll carry them.  We have 6 games against the Tigers this year. And yes, most of them were without the cadre of regulars. But here are the offensive numbers against them: .211/.282/.392 - .674 OPS They scored 20 runs in 6 games against them. Barely scraping 3 R/G. And a good portion of them coming in *1* game.  Out of the WC potentials the O's could face, here are their R/G: Royals: 29 in 6 games = 4.8 R/G Twins: 22 in 3 = 7.3 R/G Mariners: 27 in 6 = 4.5 R/G Tigers: 20 in 6 = 3.3 R/G Out of all the playoff teams, the best RA/G are the Mariners (3.75), Guardians (3.85), and Tigers (4.96). For the playoffs, you want to look at who you're facing on the bump. Which team scares you the most? Because if you can't hit against the team, it doesn't matter what the opposing offense is.  Also you'll want to consider the best fielding teams, too.   Seems to me you'd want to face the team you matchup best against *and* who has the worst defense and worst pitching, because presumably your 3 starters (Burnes, Eflin, Kremer) should be able to hold teams in check. 
    • I'd prefer Detroit - they've been so hot for so long they should be due to cool off. KC has been just the opposite. 
    • I'd say the Royals...pitch around Witt and Salvy Perez who seems to have had our number in recent years.  The rest of their lineup isn't too imposing. Wacha  -a guy I wanted this offseason and was laughed at for wanting him- has a 2.64 ERA over his last 15 starts.  He's the soft-tossing type that gives our lineup fits and, IIRC, he was great against us earlier this year.  Lugo has had a great year, so has Ragans.  Their starters are good. But they're 3-7 over their last 10 while the Tigers are 8-2.  A lot of the postseason, IMO, is catching teams at the right/wrong time.  This could all change by next week but the Tigers are hot, the Royals are not... Then again, I said I wanted to face Texas in the first round last year and look what happened.  So who knows.  
    • Would much rather face KC and to me it’s not close.    game 1 agains Skubal is an L. They’ve proven they can beat us with a bullpen game, a bullpen only behind CLE as best in the AL.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...