Jump to content

So who are the sellers right now?


Jagwar

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Baltimorecuse said:

I think WAR and a buck gets you a cup of senior citizen coffee at Mickey D's.  I think Santander will drive in a 100 this year, and hit 30+ homers, barring injury.  I HOPE there is a better version of Cowser than we've seen so far.  

I think it’s pretty likely (70%) that Cowser has a better career than Santander’s.  Maybe not more homers or RBI’s.   Better BA, better OBP, more runs scored, better defense.  But that’s not to diss what Santander has accomplished, or may still accomplish in the future.  He’s a solid player.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We'll see both teams in the next couple weeks, but the Baseball Trade Values podcast folks this week had the take both the Rays and the Dodgers (and their strong farms) have had so many pitching injuries they too will be in the thick of it fighting it out for Giolito, Eduardo and anyone else important.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Just Regular said:

We'll see both teams in the next couple weeks, but the Baseball Trade Values podcast folks this week had the take both the Rays and the Dodgers (and their strong farms) have had so many pitching injuries they too will be in the thick of it fighting it out for Giolito, Eduardo and anyone else important.

I think there is a ton of SP’s who will be available with expiring contracts. 
 

The Dodgers win the West, they get a bye. Same with Rays. Would be nice to be greedy and win the division. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I think it’s pretty likely (70%) that Cowser has a better career than Santander’s.  Maybe not more homers or RBI’s.   Better BA, better OBP, more runs scored, better defense.  But that’s not to diss what Santander has accomplished, or may still accomplish in the future.  He’s a solid player.   

I base nothing on AAA numbers, and nothing on WAR.  WAR is a statistical bridge too far for me.  There's too much subjectivity.  I don't think Cowser has the power people think he does.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Baltimorecuse said:

I base nothing on AAA numbers, and nothing on WAR.  WAR is a statistical bridge too far for me.  There's too much subjectivity.  I don't think Cowser has the power people think he does.  

WAR isn't that subjective

Batting Runs (RBI)- not subjective

Fielding Runs Above Average - You need some way to measure defense

Positional Adjustment - reasonable to me, the ability to play catcher is more valuable than the ability to play first base

League Adjustment - Of course deadball and steroid era stats should not be treated the same

Base Running Runs  - not subjective

Runs Added or Lost Due to Grounding into Double Plays- not subjective

 

/Runs Per Win.

 

Had you ever looked into what went into WAR?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Runs and RBI are extremely team dependent.  It's like measuring a pitcher by wins, it's far too elementary to be able to isolate individual performance.  WAR certainly shouldn't be relied upon on its own or really even used as a predictive stat, but as far as an all encompassing stat for player accumulated value in a given year , it's the best we have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Can_of_corn said:

WAR isn't that subjective

Batting Runs (RBI)- not subjective

Fielding Runs Above Average - You need some way to measure defense

Positional Adjustment - reasonable to me, the ability to play catcher is more valuable than the ability to play first base

League Adjustment - Of course deadball and steroid era stats should not be treated the same

Base Running Runs  - not subjective

Runs Added or Lost Due to Grounding into Double Plays- not subjective

 

/Runs Per Win.

 

Had you ever looked into what went into WAR?

Actually I did.  How those numbers are weighted, particularly fielding numbers, is subjective.  As I understand it, there is more than one WAR.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • No, as it appears to be a group think decision, where all have some input.  In the end it really doesn't matter if it's all Elias, Sigbot or Hyde or some combination of the 3, Hyde is the one who defends it to the media/fans, and he's the one who gets paid to take the critism/blame.  Either way, starting Slater is the move that WHOEVER make the decisions appears to love, so that's what I expect to see, even if it doesn't make sense based on this years performances.
    • I’m guessing he may be bulk reliever later in game. Have to see. 
    • You think Hyde alone makes the decision?
    • Gil has been terrible in his last 2 starts, he has  given up 10 earned runs in 11 innings
    • It's a meaningless game so hard to read anything into it. It could also be more of an "opener" gambit so that Davidson can be brought in with favorable matchups. For a team that believes so strongly in matchups, I don't know why we don't use the opener more often, especially when it has been effective against us. 
    • Both are deserving. That’s not the point. How they construct the pen in ‘25 may be different. None of the guys you mentioned have been pen guys, although McDermott probably should be. Young and Rogers are more of a starter repertoire. Armbruster and others, like Tony said in another thread, should be pen arms. You need flexible and effective arms to move up and down, while they gain experience. We need some guys with some swing and miss stuff. Adding Bautista back into the back end moves everyone down a notch, but some of the guys we have now will likely have to move on for the purposes of flexibility. There is always some natural turnover, and for good reason. 
    • And?  If they were buying his career stats, then they were fooled by a bait and switch.  Yeah, career numbers are good, but they don't reflect the reality of this year.  .541 OPS against LHP.  Elias/Hyde has a tendency to bring in guys who might have had good career numbers, but who are not playing at that level in the current year, but then letting them play like they are performing at career levels.  Slaters numbers this year don't reflect that he should be getting starts versus LHP over Cowser, even with the struggles Cowser has had.  That said, I fully expect to see Slater starting as that's the move Hyde will love, and will then speak eloquently at how great Slater is hitting against LHP this year, even though that's clearly a lie.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...