Jump to content

The Loop could be closing..


bigbird

Recommended Posts

The Orioles could have been an 85 win team last season had they actually had a ML average rotation because of their potent offense. It sounds like we could actually have that this season...

We shall see...Remember, many saw Uehera as a reliever and Looper will be worse in the AL than the NL.

I am looking for innings from the rotation...Give me 850ish innings and a collective ERA around 4.80 and I think we will be ok...That should be enough for our pen to be very good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 189
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I am not a fan of two guaranteed years.

since it is for cheap, it's not awful, but I wouldn't have gone past a year and an option.

Then we probably wouldn't have reached an agreement. Just because we had more leverage than Looper doesn't mean we had TOTAL leverage. This seems to be a reasonable price to pay, in dollars and years, in exchange for the value he brings.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2/10? Damn, that kind of sucks. Its not a ton of money but hate the second year.

You had to expect that if the O's offered one and Looper countered 3 that they'd meet in the middle at 2 years.

They were willing to guarantee Wigginton a second year which is why he signed and I'd bet they are doing the same with Looper.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then we probably wouldn't have reached an agreement. Just because we had more leverage than Looper doesn't mean we had TOTAL leverage. This seems to be a reasonable price to pay, in dollars and years, in exchange for the value he brings.

But then have you have to ask yourself this, would you rather have him for two guaranteed years or not at all?

For me, that's a tough question. Personally, I like Looper, but I feel that there are just too many unknown factors that make a two-year deal for him a potential mistake.

He's 34, he's only pitched two seasons as a SP. Now, he did pitch relatively well in those two seasons, but that was in the NL Central. How will he adjust to pitching in the AL? He could very well post similar stats to last season, but it is very likely he sees his ERA jump up into the 4.75 range. It is also likely it could go up even higher, he could really struggle to adjust to the AL, or he could start to decline, after all, he is 34 years old.

I don't think two guaranteed years is awful, but I'm not sure it was neccessary. Who else would have given him two years? Even Jon Garland only got one and an option.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good move on Andy's part if it happens. It's the real final piece of the puzzle and solidifies the pitching staff to a point of not being a total embarassment that can hold its own on some nights. I am also not sold on Uehera being a lock for the rotation, by the way. We'll see how he does in the Spring.

All in all, if this happens, I rate the off-season as an A.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • If you're projecting a future lineup without Mullins in 2026, then EBJ is a reasonable placeholder name to put in there. I would assume most people understand that it's not a sure thing to work out that way. 
    • Every year players are injured sliding head first into bags or even worse home plate. Just noticed that EBJ has a head injury from sliding head first into home (really dangerous and stupid) I'll say it again, what analytics driven organization will be the first to ban head first slides for all of their players I remember when David Sequi was a decent player and ended his career with a serious hand injury sliding head/hand first into home. Cal never slid head first, and wouldn't have been the iron man if he did.
    • Oh, I don't know. I thought when accusing someone of wild malpractice over possibly, maybe, slightly speeding up highlights that kind of opened the door to a little goofy exaggeration.
    • I was going to post something about this after reading about that on MLBTR this morning. That gives me a lot of hope for Bradish if this kid can come back from a UCL sprain and throw 103. Obviously, reliever vs. starter so who knows. But uplifting to read nonetheless. 
    • Hollocher hit almost exclusively 2nd in the order. The Cubs' 3rd hitters (and it was the Cubs, not the Indians as I previously stated) were mostly Marty Krug, Zeb Terry, and John Kelleher. Krug was awful for a 1922 3rd-place hitter, with an 83 OPS+ in his only season as a MLB regular, but he only struck out 43 times in 524 PAs. Terry was worse, OPS+ing 74, but with just 16 Ks in 571 PAs. And Kelleher was the worst of the bunch, OPS+ing 60, while striking out 14 times in 222 PAs. Cubs manager Reindeer Bill Killefer stuck hard and fast to the old rule of thumb that the catcher should bat 8th, even if it's Bob O'Farrell and he hit .324 with an .880 OPS. Ray Grimes had a 1.014 OPS and batted cleanup. But Hack Miller and his .899 OPS batted mostly 6th. Statz wasn't a terrible leadoff hitter, was one of only a couple players who had a SB% higher than 50%, but was 6th among their regulars in OBP. That's as bad a bunch of #3 hitters as I've seen in a while, yet the Cubs finished 80-74-2. Just goes to show you batting order doesn't really matter. Anyway, back to the main point... yes, I'm sure some of Hollocher's CS were busted hit-and-runs. But nobody that regularly batted behind him struck out in even 7% of PAs so they shoulda been putting the ball in play the vast majority of the time.    
    • Bobby needs to git gud. 
    • How many people actually said they were one of the greatest teams ever?   They did hit the snot out of the ball the first 9 games of the year, mostly in a 6 game series in a very hitter-friendly ball park against a bad pitching staff.  That said, they’re still second in the league in runs per game.  Their pitching has been problematic, yielding 6.50 runs per game.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...