Jump to content

What do we do about Jorge Mateo?


OsFanSinceThe80s

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Bahama O's Fan said:

So...I think Mateo could start for quite a few teams in the MLB. If that's the case, why do some of think he has very little trade value? How much is a starting SS with elite speed and great defense who is as good as a third to a half of the other SS in the league worth?

Fangraphs Major League Leaders leaderboard filtered for SS playing as SS with at least 200 PA has Mateo ranked as 25th measured by WAR (0.4 total, 2.7 Def and -10.3 Off).  He is also at 25 sorted for defensive WAR.  This is for all of MLB not just AL.  He has found a useful (if redundant) role with the Orioles but overall he performs around the 20th percentile, not 33rd and certainly not 50th.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, tntoriole said:

It gets back to the ultimate question…is Gunnar or Jackson the Os shortstop?  
 

Jackson has played 25 games at 2b in minors! 

Gunnar's arm is much stronger from what I have seen.

Right now is Holliday a better 2B than Westburg?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Gunnar's arm is much stronger from what I have seen.

Right now is Holliday a better 2B than Westburg?

I think Westburg answered any questions about his defense this year. He got to that ball up the middle last night to hold the runner at 3B. He is a player to keep but maybe he could move to COF with his speed and athleticism. We need to see what we have in Cowser and HK first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Gunnar's arm is much stronger from what I have seen.

Right now is Holliday a better 2B than Westburg?

Hitting is part of the equation.  Let’s say Westburg is a little ahead on defense but Holliday is ready to be a noticeably better hitter.  In that situation, you don’t make your decision on defense along.  You weigh the two and see who’s better overall.   Mind you, I’m not saying I think Holliday is ready to be the better overall player right now, I’m just discussing this hypothetically.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Gunnar's arm is much stronger from what I have seen.

Right now is Holliday a better 2B than Westburg?

If Gunnar flies through playoffs , tearing it up as SS, he will have that position in 2024 no matter what Jackson does I suspect.. thus the 2nd base starts for Jackson in minors this year 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, tntoriole said:

If Gunnar flies through playoffs , tearing it up as SS, he will have that position in 2024 no matter what Jackson does I suspect.. thus the 2nd base starts for Jackson in minors this year 

I don't think Elias is making decisions about next season based on a dozen or so postseeason games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Hitting is part of the equation.  Let’s say Westburg is a little ahead on defense but Holliday is ready to be a noticeably better hitter.  In that situation, you don’t make your decision on defense along.  You weigh the two and see who’s better overall.   Mind you, I’m not saying I think Holliday is ready to be the better overall player right now, I’m just discussing this hypothetically.  

2023 AAA OPS:

Westburg  939

Holliday    796

Edited by wildcard
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, wildcard said:

AAA OPS:

Westburg  939

Holliday    796

I think that’s important.  But, it’s a long winter.  We’ll see how things look in the spring.  I’m on record as saying that I think the odds are against Holliday making the team on Opening Day, but I wouldn’t rule it out completely.  

Edited by Frobby
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

That isn't accurate.  You are listing Westburg's AAA OPS for this season only.

I'd also like to point out that Westburg was in his age 23 and 24 seasons and Holliday is in his age 19 season.

 

Holliday may have the higher ceiling but Westburg has achieved more offensively at AAA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • If thats where he's at 1B or Dh there will be no extension. The bat woud have to be super special. and it's not. we already have like 3 of those Mounty, O'hearn and Mayo
    • The on field product has the talent to win and bring out fans now.  I’m not saying not to spend more money.  Your first paragraph I agree with. The new owner assumes all the “debts” leftover. Ultimately it’s their responsibility to repair it.    They screwed up big time with their pricing. If this team rebounds and gets in the DS the excitement will pick up. Only the last week did they have any momentum after months of losing it. 
    • That’s a very good point, but then you have the question whether you would be willing to give up McDermott plus for erceg, and that’s an easy trade to make. Plus, the athletics need almost everything, they wouldn’t want Hays But we could’ve found something to satisfy them.
    • IMO, this mindset ("new chapter") is part of the problem. We can't act like the past and the terrible relationship that the org had with it's customer base does not matter or have a carryover effect. Whether the org calls itself "new" or not IMO is irrelevant. The issue is whether or not it will operate in enough meaningful different ways. If the org wants more of it's market to be engaged it is going to have to raise the bar to championship expectations and invest more in the on-field product. That would be different from the past and would indeed reflect that something is "new".
    • All of you guys talking about empty seats and an unengaged fanbase - did you not see the post showing over 41K in attendance, more than in MIL or HOU?  Are those fan bases also unengaged or disinterested? This is much ado about absolutely nothing.
    • I think at this point its just semantics regarding what a successful deadline looked like.  Elias upgraded three positions - SP, 2 RP.  Could there have been bigger upgrades?  Sure, at a bigger cost.  I think it was sufficient.  What has killed the team is the hitting.  If this team had hit like its capable of, and Soto, Eflin, and Dominguez all pitched exactly as they have, we'd all be feeling a lot better about the team, and probably lauding Elias for those three pickups and what a great boost they were at the deadline.  But we aren't hitting - at all - and I don't know what he could have done at the deadline to fix that. Already agreed that the draft strategy must evolve. I don't agree it was a bad strategy to do what they did so far, but it does have to evolve, just as the organization as a whole has evolved.  And I think it will.
    • I don't mean this as any kind of personal slight toward you. Please do not take this as such. But people/fans showed how they felt about this team who has been a loser for almost 4 months. And largely continued to hedge (beyond the Eflin addition) at the deadline. I bet you who did not have a bunch of empty seats for their playoff game yesterday .... San Diego. IMO it is because of the effort that they put in to continue to engage the fanbase. You can't sell people on the "homegrown" stars idea and no need to add a lot of outside talent. And then some of those "homegrown stars" who were so hyped flop. And then not extend the ones who turn into stars. That communicates a lack of investment by the org. Now when you add that up in the economy/2024 inflation and combine that with all of the other entertainment choices that people have in 2024; things like this will happen. Empty seats during a playoff game = an unengaged/unexcited fan base. The org has to own much of this.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...