Jump to content

Angelos wanted two year lease extension


Going Underground

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, SemperFi said:

The Orioles are not relocating for four main reasons:

-expansion is coming and owners will maximize entry fees not cut into them by allowing the Orioles to relocate

-MLB has made it clear they want the Orioles in Baltimore

-the Angelos family is a pariah in MLB circles, MLB will do them no favors especially after offering to "open the books" one of MLB's greatest fears.  MASN litigation, PA and unions.........  

-MLB's most fervent desire for the franchise is that the  PA plays out, the Angelos family sells and disappears.  Allowing them to relocate likely means continued Angelos ownership.

-most importantly the Orioles debt is almost certainly held by MLB which means MLB controls the Orioles destiny.  MLB holds varying levels of debt for all but two franchises, averaging $125m per team-if JA were to have his debt or a portion of it called he would be in a world of hurt. 

 

Maybe piling on here, but the fact that posts about the Orioles moving keep popping up suggests that it might be useful.

First, one of the pillars of MLB's business strategy is enabling teams to extract as much money as possible from local governments to build new stadiums and to maintain and renovate aging ones.  As one piece of that strategy, MLB has maintained that a team canl succeed anywhere if it has an appealing ballpark. That's why Oakland and Tampa Bay have been singled out and will be permitted to move if they want: MLB attributes their problems to their terrible ball parks. Unless and until Camden Yards falls into serious disrepair, the owners will not approve of the team moving. even if there's an appealing opportunity. (Nashville, by the way, is not available.) 

The statement that MLB wants the Angeloses to sell the team is no doubt true, but I think it's a little more complicated than that. It's virtually certain that John/Lou will sell after their father dies and they inherit control of the team. But the owners had a chance to force a sale when Peter Angelos signed a power of attorney in favor of his wife, transferring control of the team to her. The owners could have voted not to approve that transfer, forcing a sale of the team and creating an obligation for Peter to pay probably hundreds of millions of dollars in capital gains taxes.

There are three logical possibilities. There are three possibilities. Number one: MLB's owners have a generous spirit toward the Angeloses and are willing to forgive and forget, and in that spirit they will allow John/Lou own the team after Peter dies. Number two: When they learned of the power of attorney, the owners decided to be nice guys and they approved of control of the team passing to Georgia Angelos, but they have left open the approval of control passing to John/Lou when Peter dies.  Number three: there's a deal under which the Angeloses are permitted to retain ownership while Peter is alive but must sell the team after Peter's death, allowing the Angeloses to avoid capital gains taxes  while enabling MLB to get rid of the Angeloses when the inevitable happens.

I know which one makes the most sense to me, and I can't think of any other explanations for what's happened.

Edited by spiritof66
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, SemperFi said:

The Orioles are not relocating for four main reasons:

-expansion is coming and owners will maximize entry fees not cut into them by allowing the Orioles to relocate

-MLB has made it clear they want the Orioles in Baltimore

-the Angelos family is a pariah in MLB circles, MLB will do them no favors especially after offering to "open the books" one of MLB's greatest fears.  MASN litigation, PA and unions.........  

-MLB's most fervent desire for the franchise is that the  PA plays out, the Angelos family sells and disappears.  Allowing them to relocate likely means continued Angelos ownership.

-most importantly the Orioles debt is almost certainly held by MLB which means MLB controls the Orioles destiny.  MLB holds varying levels of debt for all but two franchises, averaging $125m per team-if JA were to have his debt or a portion of it called he would be in a world of hurt. 

 

I don't think the Orioles are going anywhere but  I just don't trust John Angelos. Move and make the owner's sue and then tie it  up in court like the MASN conflict.  Until he signs on the dotted line,don't trust him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Going Underground said:

I don't think the Orioles are going anywhere but  I just don't trust John Angelos. Move and make the owner's sue and then tie it  up in court like the MASN conflict.  Until he signs on the dotted line,don't trust him.

My guess is that the language is super clear on the issue and it would be about impossible to tie up in the courts.  Otherwise someone would have tried it by now.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

The mystery that has hung over Baltimore like a dark cloud for most of this year is coming into sharper focus. The reason the Orioles have not signed a long-term lease at Camden Yards is that Angelos, the managing partner and CEO of the team, wants a bigger bag.

Apparently the $600 million in public bonds the franchise would get once it signs a new lease is not enough. Angelos wants to expand his empire beyond the bounds of the ballpark.

John Angelos sought additional $300 million, use of parking lots for development in lease stalemate

Reporting from The Banner’s staff has found a number of mind-numbing revelations. Angelos has asked for $300 million in additional public funds and looked into how he can acquire development rights on adjacent properties in addition to a long-term lease, which he insists on calling a “partnership.” Even though these development rights would line his own pockets, he doesn’t seem to want to pay for them. Someone — it remains unclear who, exactly — commissioned surveys to see if a “revitalization” project dubbed “Camden Crossing” would be appetizing to neighborhoods around the ballpark, publicly airing the concept of an expensive public project before bothering to show anyone a blueprint.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, spiritof66 said:

Maybe piling on here, but the fact that posts about the Orioles moving keep popping up suggests that it might be useful.

First, one of the pillars of MLB's business strategy is enabling teams to extract as much money as possible from local governments to build new stadiums and to maintain and renovate aging ones.  As one piece of that strategy, MLB has maintained that a team canl succeed anywhere if it has an appealing ballpark. That's why Oakland and Tampa Bay have been singled out and will be permitted to move if they want: MLB attributes their problems to their terrible ball parks. Unless and until Camden Yards falls into serious disrepair, the owners will not approve of the team moving. even if there's an appealing opportunity. (Nashville, by the way, is not available.) 

The statement that MLB wants the Angeloses to sell the team is no doubt true, but I think it's a little more complicated than that. It's virtually certain that John/Lou will sell after their father dies and they inherit control of the team. But the owners had a chance to force a sale when Peter Angelos signed a power of attorney in favor of his wife, transferring control of the team to her. The owners could have voted not to approve that transfer, forcing a sale of the team and creating an obligation for Peter to pay probably hundreds of millions of dollars in capital gains taxes.

There are three logical possibilities. There are three possibilities. Number one: MLB's owners have a generous spirit toward the Angeloses and are willing to forgive and forget, and in that spirit they will allow John/Lou own the team after Peter dies. Number two: When they learned of the power of attorney, the owners decided to be nice guys and they approved of control of the team passing to Georgia Angelos, but they have left open the approval of control passing to John/Lou when Peter dies.  Number three: there's a deal under which the Angeloses are permitted to retain ownership while Peter is alive but must sell the team after Peter's death, allowing the Angeloses to avoid capital gains taxes  while enabling MLB to get rid of the Angeloses when the inevitable happens.

I know which one makes the most sense to me, and I can't think of any other explanations for what's happened.

We both know it's number three and JA is doing all he can to maximize the value of the franchise for sale once the inevitable happens.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TradeAngelos said:

Yeah Foxboro is in the middle of f'ing nowhere. Lots of land to redevelop. Where is this vast land west of Harborplace you speak of? And this vast land to the east that the Ravens interests can be "transferred" to? LOL. 

Didn't say anything about "vast" land available here.  That's your assessment of Foxboro and you're not wrong.  I'm merely commenting on the entertainment area concept.  The Harbor is going to be redeveloped.  There has been talk in the recent past about a new or improved Convention Center.  Seems likely, or more profitable - at least, that both teams would want to tie into that area and connect to that somehow.  And you've amplified the point, by pointing out the lack of space near the two stadiums.  Only the A-C parking lots are "common" area to both teams.  So go ahead and cram it in there, I guess, but that requires an ample parking garage in that space too...  I guess the bigger point is that the teams are going to have to come to some agreement before anything happens with additional funding to JA. 

If the Harbor is already on the fast track to get going (which it seems is the case), and there's a chance of the Convention Center being improved, there is certainly an access route available that would pass thru or next to the Hyatt between the office building on the corner of Pratt and Light running parallel to Conway.  The Horseshoe is farther from Oriole Park than the Harbor is, so connecting all of them would be an achievement.  There would be no need to do anything with the parking for the Ravens then either. 

If they go thru with figuring out development closer to the stadiums, whatever they do would have to include accommodating the Ravens parking.  By transferred east, I mean to where Lot H is, perhaps.  Plenty of room there for a large garage or at least enough to accommodate the loss of Lots A-C.  There's no space West of the stadiums unless there are plans to buy out businesses and/or private owners.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...