Jump to content

Lucas Giolito on waivers?


Hallas

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, clapdiddy said:

Clevinger and Carrasco cleared waivers per MLBTR.

Would Clevinger be a guy anyone would want to take a chance on?   Carrasco is an obvious "no".

How did Clevinger clear waivers and Giolito didn't?  Crazy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Hallas said:

How did Clevinger clear waivers and Giolito didn't?  Crazy.

The only thing I can think of is Clevinger has a $4M buyout if his $12M mutual option isn't exercised for next season. Clevinger would definitely help out the Orioles if they claimed him.

https://www.baseball-reference.com/players/c/clevimi01.shtml

image.thumb.png.032baef3d21b986deb88b7e73239eac1.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Clevinger I just read a factor was a $4mm buyout a Claimer would be on the hook for.

Ohio teams almost had a sweep except Mariners got Dominic Leone.

I'd wondered if Guardians would be out of it by the time we see them for Games 153-156.     I guess it is still possible, and if so boy would that be a rough year for Giolito/Lopez being on three Clubs where it didn't work out.

Energy should be high in Cleveland when the Twins visit early next week.     Hopefully Moore and Lopez help them against Rays this weekend.      Giolito, Moore and Lopez is a '24 offseason perhaps many of us here wouldn't mind for the Orioles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

The only thing I can think of is Clevinger has a $4M buyout if his $12M mutual option isn't exercised for next season. Clevinger would definitely help out the Orioles if they claimed him.

https://www.baseball-reference.com/players/c/clevimi01.shtml

image.thumb.png.032baef3d21b986deb88b7e73239eac1.png

He's good enough that I can't imagine most teams caring about 5.5 million.  Unless they were spooked by his offseason drama.  Which is a valid reason.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, clapdiddy said:

Clevinger and Carrasco cleared waivers per MLBTR.

Would Clevinger be a guy anyone would want to take a chance on?   Carrasco is an obvious "no".

Not Elias, apparently. I used to like Clevinger but he's had a bunch of off field issues. I kinda just don't really want him around our guys. I am surprised he went unclaimed though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

Not Elias, apparently. I used to like Clevinger but he's had a bunch of off field issues. I kinda just don't really want him around our guys. I am surprised he went unclaimed though. 

I’m not. Those issues were pretty serious if I recall. More surprised people on here wanted him than I am that he went unclaimed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, dystopia said:

I’m not. Those issues were pretty serious if I recall. More surprised people on here wanted him than I am that he went unclaimed. 

 

Considering he didn't get charged and was mostly cleared by an MLB investigation I'm a little surprised that *no one* claimed him.  Understanding the severity of the allegations, there didn't seem to be enough smoke there to scare away 29 teams.  But maybe I'm wrong.  Or maybe it was a combination of that smoke plus his salary?  Who knows.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Hallas said:

 

Considering he didn't get charged and was mostly cleared by an MLB investigation I'm a little surprised that *no one* claimed him.  Understanding the severity of the allegations, there didn't seem to be enough smoke there to scare away 29 teams.  But maybe I'm wrong.  Or maybe it was a combination of that smoke plus his salary?  Who knows.

I thought there were issues with racist comments in addition to the assault, but looks like that was a different Clevinger, so he's off the hook for that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Hallas said:

 

Considering he didn't get charged and was mostly cleared by an MLB investigation I'm a little surprised that *no one* claimed him.  Understanding the severity of the allegations, there didn't seem to be enough smoke there to scare away 29 teams.  But maybe I'm wrong.  Or maybe it was a combination of that smoke plus his salary?  Who knows.

Why? Clevinger's not a very good pitcher. And there was also that incident where he and Plesac broke COVID protocols and endangered infecting their teammates. I don't see any upside and apparently no one else does either. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, HakunaSakata said:

Why? Clevinger's not a very good pitcher. And there was also that incident where he and Plesac broke COVID protocols and endangered infecting their teammates. I don't see any upside and apparently no one else does either. 

Disagree on him not being very good. He's definitely well above average. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, HakunaSakata said:

Why? Clevinger's not a very good pitcher. And there was also that incident where he and Plesac broke COVID protocols and endangered infecting their teammates. I don't see any upside and apparently no one else does either. 

Seriously? You are just kidding right? With the exception of last year at San Diego he’s consistently a 3.20 ish era pitcher since 2017. He’s a 2.9 WAR 3.32 1.2 WHIP pitcher this year.

As far as I’m concerned it’s a John Angelos money thing! I’d have released Gibson this afternoon and you’d have your 4 man rotation locked in for the playoffs with Bradish, Clevinger, Kremer, & Grayson.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I too find it odd no one claimed Clevinger. The MLB went through thousands of texts and emails between him and the alleged victim, spoke to dozens of people they both know and from what it seems, did a very thorough investigation and claimed there was no merit to it and cleared him to play. He's not facing any criminal charges, and in the US at least, you are innocent until proven guilty. It appears no criminal charges suggest that there is not enough evidence to push forward. Not sure what type of teammate he is, or what type of distraction it would bring to a team.

His ERA+ is 134 and he's out performing his FIP by about a run but he keeps the ball in the yard and doesn't strike a ton of guys out. Statcast data is good not great.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • This posts wreaks of someone who has no idea what the cost of relievers are nowadays. Which is, of course, no surprise that you aren’t informed. Now that said, I don’t have an issue if you take someone out..I asked that very question. Who do you take out or what do you not acquire in favor of keeping Suarez?
    • You always have room for another high leverage guy.  And Akin has an option left according to FG.
    • Yea.  I feel the same way.  I really do not care strongly one way or another.  Sure, I think it's kind of ugly.  I also think HR's came pretty cheap before.  I like the exciting defensive plays it fosters and of course the random triple & odd carom make for some fun and unique moments.  But I don't think it helps or hurts the team in any substantial way short of helping out the pitching a little.   I sure don't think the players are changing their approaches.  If they keep it as is, that's fine with me.  If they modify it some way, that's fine with me as well.  It does seem like there is some opportunity for some unique seats down there by modifying it slightly.  When I first saw it, it almost appeared like a construction Phase 1.  That might be reasoning for pushing it back so far, allows them some flexibility in the future.   I also don't buy that a Free Agent RH hitter is going to care at all about the wall.   They are getting paid regardless.  I'd think that 1-maximizing payday 2-playing for a winner 3-finding a location that suits your family would be your priorities and your long-term stat line would be very close to the bottom of your list of concerns.  
    • His "ability to play RF" carries about $0 value
    • Yeah but if you think most of this money is going to upgrade things that are wrong or need improving, such as the ones @accinfo lists, I think you'll be disappointed.   They will be for new features, each one designed to create revenue via premium seating or premium "experience" areas or attractions that bring non baseball fans to the park to spend or sports betting related things. I'm not saying they won't fix some basic things that need it like upgrading the sound system or improving the point of sale technology.   I'm sure they will.   But the focus is going to be on the new attractions which are all designed with revenue enhancement in mind.
    • I’m not a lawyer … perhaps @Frobbymight know. Loss of income, future revenues? Damage to their franchise….Even with MASN the Orioles lost a ton on annual tv revenues
    • Congrats to the offense on playing a heck of a game. Lamar was incredible to watch, especially the play when the snap ended up on the ground and he had to run away towards the sideline and still found Likely for the score. It's very frustrating to me that the offense HAD to play so well because of the poor coaching and abysmal defensive play.  It's odd to me that Harbaugh still messes up timeout usage after being a coach in the league for over 15 years.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...