Jump to content

Going to miss Kevin, Jim, and Ben


seak05

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

I also never said I like Scott Garceau better. I’d prefer Kevin Brown to Garceau, obviously, but I just don’t really care for Kevin Brown. It’s not a schtick. 

And you are entitled to your totally wrong and misguided opinion.  I don’t think any less of you because of it.  Well, maybe a little.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Mooreisbetter27 said:

They seem to really like Gary Thorne.  We were top 6 in all their previous rankings with Thorne. 

As for the Nats broadcast... I have always found them completely unwatchable (unlistenable?).

I think it's almost entirely based on fan voting. Fan approval ratings. They also noted that they only received around 10,000 votes total compared to 60,000 the last time they did this. So, small sample size.

It would be interesting if the Hangout did similar approval ratings of Orioles commentary on a yearly basis.

Edited by dzorange
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Palmer and Ben are #1.  I don't get the KB ire but I do think he is somewhat generic but good which works when Palmer and/or Ben are on.  I don't know how many agree but Thorne/Palmer is still one of my favorites - incredibly entertaining to the point that my wife would listen (only while doing other things).

Also, I remember when Melanie (radio) received pretty bad reviews here towards the beginning of the season and I was one of them.  I have listened recently and believe she has improved.  That is a tough job but I assume she has made a total effort to grow.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Frobby said:

And you are entitled to your totally wrong and misguided opinion.  I don’t think any less of you because of it.  Well, maybe a little.  

I understand why people like him.  And when he's calling he action, he's fine.  He's actually pretty good.  

It's the the corniness, the pop culture references, trying to make a stretch out of tiny facts no one cares about, (And 2019's FIRST overall pick grounds out to 2019's SECOND overall pick) and all the other idiosyncrasies that drive me up a wall.

As far as TV PBP guys go over the course of my life I'd rank him a distant third behind Thorne and Mel Proctor and  well ahead of 4th place Jim Hunter and 5th place Michael "Randall K Myers" Reghi.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

I understand why people like him.  And when he's calling he action, he's fine.  He's actually pretty good.  

It's the the corniness, the pop culture references, trying to make a stretch out of tiny facts no one cares about, (And 2019's FIRST overall pick grounds out to 2019's SECOND overall pick) and all the other idiosyncrasies that drive me up a wall.

See, I like that stuff.  I especially enjoy it when he makes some cultural reference and Jim and/or Ben have no idea what he’s talking about.  I find that hilarious - even when I don’t know what he’s talking about, either.   But, different strokes for different folks.  

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Frobby said:

See, I like that stuff.  I especially enjoy it when he makes some cultural reference and Jim and/or Ben have no idea what he’s talking about.  I find that hilarious - even when I don’t know what he’s talking about, either.   But, different strokes for different folks.  

That's fair, different strokes for different folks.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of my earliest and favorite memories of the Kevin Brown hipster nerd brand was when he strained to get Glenn Gulliver mentioned somehow, and then some kind of pun about him being travelled.      I think he expected Ben to get the Swift allusion (not even a Taylor Swift one), and it just fell on dead air for about five beats.

It is jarring to think by next Wednesday he could be out of town calling some Conference Small Town football game on a purple field for ESPN Ocho because we have live sports 24-7-365, and in a few days his run here is as over as Jon Miller, Miggy, Votto, etc.

I heard them promoting the postseason postgame shows last night but I think that stuff goes to the Melanie Newman-Rob Long-Brett Hollander-Scott Garceau section of the MASN depth chart.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • This has to be one of the funniest posts in the entire thread, maybe of all time.  
    • I've never been a big Stowers believer but I'd be happy to be wrong.  Dude deserves more at bats...I get it, it's a crowded situation but he's made the most of his at bats so far this year and has been mashing.   Going to be par for the course if he sits today after hitting a homer yesterday so I won't be surprised.  Gotta find out what you have in this dude though and so far he hasn't disappointed during this stretch in Baltimore.
    • You stopped just shy of Hunter Harvey (2013) and Marcus Stroman (2012).   The fact is, going back to 2000, of those 24 picks at #22, 16 were pitchers.  Not many success stories.  Kolten Wong is the only notable college position players.  Colson Montgomery (22) is a top prospect but hitting .223 at AAA and far from a sure thing.  Colton Emerson, a HS SS chosen last year gets rave reviews but he’s got a long way to go.    So, not many success stories no matter which demographic you go with.  Position players are always going to be safer.
    • It's  hard to say what Cowser or Stowers is or will be but I think Stowers deserves at least a couple of weeks of consistent ABs at this point. Cowser looks like he can't hit a breaking ball to save his life right now and after seeing a couple of those he swings right through the fastball. Stowers could be similar but let's find out. 
    • I wasn’t able to watch all of his first start but in his second start, Povich was really, really good at locating his fastball at or above the top of the zone and his curve at or below the zone. I think the fact that it’s not a great fastball may get hitters to still swing at it at a high rate there, and even though it’s not going to get the same whiffs as a better fastball he’s been super effective getting pop-ups with it (which are actually an even better outcome than a whiff!). That’s why his hard hit rate, barrel rate and xERA are so low - similar to Suarez (although Suarez gets whiffs up there too). If Povich can consistently do that, work in the cutter for strikes and get whiffs on the curve, I think he can be successful even if the fastball is lacking.  So far I’ve only really seen Povich use his sweeper against lefties, and that’s just fine. Even if the league is getting better at hitting them, that’s always going to be an effective pitch against leftie and it’s his only pitch with a heavy platoon advantage. He just needs some combination of the cutter and change to be effective in-zone pitches for him against righties because he’s going to need to live at the top border with his 4-seamer and that will make it harder to reliably get strikes that way.  (Btw, I don’t put too much stock on the Stuff+ grades for changeups. Anecdotally, there are really very few changeups that grade well by Stuff+, the ones that do are more the screwball variety than a classic straight change without the forceful pronation. They’re very reliant on location and IMO that’s easier when you’re just trying to deaden the pitch rather than pronante for movement.)
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...