Jump to content

Cease vs everyone else


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

12 hours ago, 24fps said:

As for HuskerFan's credibility in general, I simply don't believe in vaguely sourced, quasi-inside information that has popped up out of nowhere on a message board.

I will say this... quasi-inside information popped up on this message board about Ryan Mountcastle being ill (wuith Vertigo) before he was pulled out of the game, citing a source who was a famliy friend. People didn't believe it, but they were right.

Quasi-inside information popped up on this message board 1 month ago about someone from the Carlyle group in talks to buy the Orioles. So far, that has proven to be fairly accurate too. (Although we still don't know the details or specifics because it's still happening in real time. What is likely to happen is a minority stake with a option to buy out the majority after Peter passes, which was also reported in that rumor.)

So far I have been impressed with some of the information I've heard here first before anywhere else.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

The Dodgers signings of Ohtani and Joe Kelly are not official yet.  Why?  Their roster is at 40 and they need to make room.  Could the holdup be a 3-1 or 4-1 deal for Dylan Cease?   

And they’ll need to make room for Mateo once we trade him! But seriously, we should trade him to L.A. for a pitching prospect. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, RZNJ said:

If a deal goes down we’ll find out who the Dodgers best pitching prospect (not most highly rated) is because that’s the one the Rays will get back.

Maybe, but I'd feel better about an Andrew Friedman production than say something with the Reds.

I think the Rays of recent years enjoyed a bump over the normal baseline thanks to the Pirates' silliness with the Chris Archer acquisition.    The Glasnow and Meadows part is about to be over.    Shane Baz is just getting started but he's paid the surgeon now so his chances of being a Glasnow-level performer are less.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

 

Cue the Six Million Dollar Man intro.

And while we're at it, let's ignore all the noise designed to remove any advantage a first-rate FO like the Orioles might have when it comes to research and analysis.  There would be no point in trading for Cease if a team didn't think it could steer his performance back to 2022 levels.  He's going to be expensive, if for no other reason than because that narrative will be repeated often enough to gain some traction.

The fact remains that the O's are best positioned to trade what is required unless CHW decides it wants young pitching that could be used in 2024.  If that's the case then the advantage shifts to the Dodgers IMO.  The only other question in my mind is Elias' willingness to trade more than what most of us think is "fair".  Personally I don't care if the world at large thinks the Orioles didn't win a trade 24 hours after it happened.  Get back to me about 10 months from now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

 

As always I look at these reports through the lens of who gains an advantage by it coming out.  If it's an NL executive then this person's team is not trying to get Cease but is trying to drive up the price for a competitor.  Or, and more than likely, it's tied back to the Sox who are still not happy with the offers for him.

I still believe getting Cease is the logical and obvious move for the O's, much in the same vein as Kimbrel.  It seems like the Sox are stuck between what they perceive as his value and what everyone else does.  They were dumb not to trade him at the deadline last year because teams would have gotten three postseasons out of him and now that's down to two.  Unfortunately, though, if they are going to continue to be unreasonable this may not happen.  I would not be surprised if they continue to be stubborn and if they don't get what they want they push this trade to the deadline this year.  Once someone puts their foot in the ground it can be difficult for them to come off it.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, StottyByNature said:

As always I look at these reports through the lens of who gains an advantage by it coming out.  If it's an NL executive then this person's team is not trying to get Cease but is trying to drive up the price for a competitor.  Or, and more than likely, it's tied back to the Sox who are still not happy with the offers for him.

I still believe getting Cease is the logical and obvious move for the O's, much in the same vein as Kimbrel.  It seems like the Sox are stuck between what they perceive as his value and what everyone else does.  They were dumb not to trade him at the deadline last year because teams would have gotten three postseasons out of him and now that's down to two.  Unfortunately, though, if they are going to continue to be unreasonable this may not happen.  I would not be surprised if they continue to be stubborn and if they don't get what they want they push this trade to the deadline this year.  Once someone puts their foot in the ground it can be difficult for them to come off it.

Agreed.  They asked for too much at the deadline.  The rumors were they asked for Holliday?  What were they thinking.  With Cease being available for three offseasons then, I'm sure we would've parted with one of Cowser/Kjerstad.  

It seems like we've been at a stand off with them since last July.  Now they want the package we offered then.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, 24fps said:

There would be no point in trading for Cease if a team didn't think it could steer his performance back to 2022 levels.  

I have zero expectation that we would be able to get Cease back to 2022 levels.   Do you have any idea how good he was that year?   WAY better than Bradish was in 2023 for us.   Sure, getting him back to that is a best case scenario we could hope for.  But to expect that, or close, is foolish.  It’s more realistic to think we can get him back to being the 113 ERA+ he’s been over his career.  That’s how he should be valued in a trade, and anything we get from him beyond that is gravy.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I doubt Ortiz will have an 800+ OPS all year but I guess its possible. Right now the trade looks like a win for both teams. Milwaukee of course gets 5 more years after this to fully reap the benefits. 
    • Probably because of pitch count. Doesn’t change my point. 
    • Robert would be a significant upgrade over Mullins (offensively). Not sure how much of a difference the two have defensively. But as much as I like Mullins, he has been really bad with the bat in his hand for about a season now. Second half of last season and most of the first half of this season. Obviously the issue with Robert is his health/availability, so there would be risk there. But I wouldn't mind if Elias took a swing there, as long as this wouldn't be his only move. I would like to see Elias act bold and decisively this go round (at the deadline). I heard that the CHI SOX wanted a "Soto like" package (that the Nats got for trading him to the Pads) back for Robert. We know that they have a recent history of over asking on players they are in theory willing to trade. Anybody have a guess on what the realistic costs for Robert would be?
    • This is all correct. And to add to it, If Gunnar only continues being this version of Gunnar, he is out-valued only by the sole two-way player in baseball (Ohtani). So, comparing Soto to Gunnar in a vacuum might make some sense, their situations are vastly different. The closeness of the young guys has been well documented and we know that the group of Adley, Gunnar, Mountcastle, Stowers, Westy and Cowser are all strong in their faith. I do believe that will play some part in the contract finagling. I do not know any of them personally and with the union, the pressure of the sport, endorsements, etc. etc. ... I realize that at the end of the day guys are going to want what they are worth but I have long thought two things about this crop of players: they are incredibly consistent but they also seem to be genuinely good kids who want to win and put the team first. We don't know yet what will happen over the next few years with these players but I wouldn't be surprised to see a version of what the cast of Friends did early in the show's run, where they essentially formed their own union of sorts and structured their compensation so that none of them would become bigger than the sum of their parts. Again, I don't know them personally and I am fully in-tune with the idea that they all want to be paid but I think that their closeness means more to them than Soto's relationship with his teammates in Washington, and I think that holds true with respect to almost literally any other free agent in the history of the game. They are very unique in that they have this young group who are all 23 - 27 right now who are very tight. I happen to think that the stars of this team will be more inclined to consider more team-friendly deals if it means that their posse can stay in-tact for a longer duration of time. Call me naïve but that's how I see it. I've been intimately involved in the game at various levels myself and I can honestly say that I can't remember a group of young players who demonstrated a caring for each other to the same level of these kids. It could mean nothing when Gunnar is being thrown half a billion dollars or when Adley is offered the moon but I just don't see these players being as motivated by money as other (especially recent) stars.  I agree 100% that Gunnar would jump all over that Witt Jr. deal. I think he is smart enough to know that anything could happen over the next five years. Plus $288 million is a shitload of money. I don't know how  many generations of wealth that is but damn that's a lot of money for a soon to be 23 year old kid.   
    • There is a lot to like and I can't see why nobody would want him but for the possibility that he won't help the team much in October 2024, the cost would probably be an absurd ask.
    • I think the focus is going to be on relief pitching.   I don't think any of the guys SG listed would be needed for the types of relievers the O's will be going after.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...