Jump to content

Cease vs everyone else


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, 24fps said:

I started the offseason thinking the payroll would go to roughly $85 million.  I've since revised my expectation to at least $100 million by the end of the year, which sounds about right because even a tier 3 starter would get it close to that before Opening Day.  I'm not holding my breath about any extensions.

I've said all along that since last year's success there is no place for JA to hide on the payroll question and there isn't.  MLB rights fees, MASN rights fees, increased attendance and a host of other revenue streams means that a $100 million MLB payroll for the O's is sustainable at a minimum.

I believe the O's get $100 million straight from MLB.  Tell me if I'm wrong. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

I believe the O's get $100 million straight from MLB.  Tell me if I'm wrong. 

I think so, but you still need to know what their non-major league payroll costs are to draw any conclusions about what payroll they could afford.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SoxFan3344 said:

It all depends on the offers Getz is getting. If Joey Ortiz is the headlining piece then yeah if I’m Getz I’m turning it down too. I’m sure he has a minimum price in mind that he’d accept right now that isn’t actually the “sun and the moon” 

If Joey Ortiz is the headliner I would too. I think most people here understand that the marketplace is competitive enough that for any O’s deal Ortiz would have to be a second piece at best.  

It’s not hard to believe that Getz is asking for a lot, but beyond that I don’t place much credence in any of the reports we’re hearing.
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I think so, but you still need to know what their non-major league payroll costs are to draw any conclusions about what payroll they could afford.  

I would bet every dollar have the O's can afford more than a bottom 3 payroll.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

I believe the O's get $100 million straight from MLB.  Tell me if I'm wrong. 

$110 is revenue sharing divided evenly among all teams. $60.1 million is the National tv contract. We still have 52% of our local revenues including tickets, MASN money, memorabilia, concessions, etc. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Roll Tide said:

$110 is revenue sharing divided evenly among all teams. $60.1 million is the National tv contract. We still have 52% of our local revenues including tickets, MASN money, memorabilia, concessions, etc. 

Yeah but can't support over $100 million payroll.  🤔

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

Yeah but can't support over $100 million payroll.  🤔

Their can support a payroll in the $160-$180 million range. There overall revenue has to to somewhere in the $280-$300 million range.

Edited by Roll Tide
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, bpilktree said:

I just don’t see where trading for Cease makes sense for Mariners.  There starting pitching isn’t the problem they have 5 solid starters already.   There weakness is hitting if you want to use Miller and Woo in a trade I would think you want to use your strength to trade for a weakness.  I don’t see a huge benefit for trading Cease for Miller or Woo this season let alone then length of control they will have on those two.  

Yeah, I’m not buying into the M’s looking to move Miller or Woo for Cease when they need offense. Probably more of Getz making his demands of what he must necessarily obtain in a trade vs working on a proposal that actually has a chance of happening.

Getz has been spurned by everyone so far; could a deal still happen with the O’s if talks get revisited, potentially.. but I’m not going to be checking mlbtrade and the twitter 24/7 for updates.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Roll Tide said:

Their can support a payroll in the $160-$180 million range. There overall revenue has to to somewhere in the $280-$300 million range.

The best thing for us is to hope for that the new ownership group gets approved by next ST and we can at least get an extension or two worked out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, wildcard said:

Discussion about trading for Cease Getz pretty boring.

Why is Getz the bad guy though?  Aren’t all the factors pretty much known and it’s on our FO and ownership?  They asked for Holliday at the deadline. Sounds like they want one of Basallo/Mayo now. We knew what Kyle Gibson wanted. 

It’s pretty straightforward… we don’t want to trade either of Mayo/Basallo, and Elias had to choose between one of Kimbrel/Gibson to sign. 

We ain’t spending any money. We got Kimbrel. Be happy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

We ain’t spending any money. We got Kimbrel. Be happy. 

This is what I've been trying to express.

Also in response to the other poster's comments about the 110M revenue sharing, if you divide that by 30 teams it only comes out to $3.6 Million the Orioles get out of that. If the nation wide TV contract is divided by 30 teams, that only adds $2Million. So all the Orioles get out of that is $3.8Million, if it's divided up by 30 teams and those are the real numbers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Like I said the other day, it would be nice to hear from some scouts, the org or whoever about all the walks, lack of power, lack of BA, etc…is he tweaking things? Is the elbow bothering him to where he can’t drive the ball? Is he getting nothing to hit?     I’m surprised someone from the Banner hasn’t gotten into this because it’s obviously a big story and one that should be reported on.  
    • One thing to note is that Jackson made swing tweaks his first three weeks back in Norfolk but then abandoned them because they “didn’t feel great”. From this Baltimore Banner article:  “Earlier, as he fiddled, Holliday felt he was “surviving” and “didn’t feel great” about where his swing was, even though he produced at the Triple-A level upon his return. That has since changed. Over the last two weeks, particularly, Holliday’s return to the mechanics he’s more familiar with has helped him get back on track.” His contact rate really dropped off when he reverted back to his familiar mechanics. I worry that he gave up on the changes too soon. First three weeks back vs. after (includes tracked pitches and non-bunts)   PAs    K%           wOBA  xwOBA whiff % 4/27-5/18 91 19.8% .366 .349 21.6% 5/19-7/2 118 28.8% .392 .337 32.1%     PAs    EV      hard hit % barrel/PA 4/27-5/18 91 89.5 44.4% 4.4% 5/19-7/2 118 89.8 44.6% 4.2%
    • Sure. And his ligaments would have likely snapped, and he'd have put that college degree to good use instead of being a ballplayer. Or he would have thrown at 90% like most everyone else and topped out with Cedar Rapids in the Three-I League.
    • Let's say you allow the sticky stuff. The guys whose sweeper breaks 10" might now see it break 12". You think they're going to grip the ball more loosely, throw with a little less effort, get hurt less, and be content with a 10" sweeper?  No! They're going to grip the hell out of the ball and use the sticky stuff and try to get a 15" sweeper. And they'll keep getting hurt just as much. It couldn't be more clear that almost every pitcher and every coach and every team chooses the high-risk, high-reward path. You can't put the genie back in the bottle.
    • I guarantee you that if Christy could only get guys out by using his best stuff he would have.  
    • I'm going to guess that in the olden days there was a weeding out that happened before most kids played an organized baseball game. Many, many kids played baseball all day long in the summer, and many, many of them tore up their elbow or shoulder at 11 or 13 or whatever and never pitched on a high school or other team. And nobody was Drivelining anyone. Part of the philosophy of pitching was you don't throw as hard as you possibly can because it hurts and you'll ruin your arm. A few people got away with throwing near max effort, but most couldn't. And there was a very stong stigma to coming out of a game, so pitchers knew they'd be shamed and mocked if they threw until it really hurt and had to come out. In the 1910's Christy Mathewson (or a ghostwriter) wrote Pitching in a Pinch, where he explicitly said that using your best stuff except when you really needed to was stupid.  Smoltz is a guy who idiotically venerates the past, making the era where he came up into some kind of golden nirvana. But, he is right that the driving factor in injuries today is that everyone throws at 110% of rated capacity all the time. It's just a matter of time until something tears.  The problem is that there is no simple solution, since throwing at 110% is simply more effective than throwing at 90%. 90% gets you (essentially) limitless innings. But 110% makes your ERA half a run or a run lower (numbers made up for illustration). And it couldn't be more clear that when $millions and wins are on the line, essentially everyone picks the lower ERA over the more innings. An average MLB pitcher has an ERA in the mid-4s. If he backs it off to 90% so he can pitch into the 8th or 9th, he'll likely have an ERA in the mid-5s, which puts him in AAA. The difference between pacing and pitching until it breaks is often the difference between $7M a year and $70k a year.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...