Jump to content

2023 Orioles #2 Prospect Samuel Basallo - C/1B


Tony-OH

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, webbrick2010 said:

A bold and very Tampa Bay move would be to move Adley for pitching and slide in Basallo as catcher in 1 to 2 years

Adley looks to be a .260 ish 20 homer guy that is not  even a great defensive catcher who is already 26

I'd say he'll probably be more like a .280/20 HR guy with above average catcher defense who will have multiple years better than that.

I don't totally hate the idea though, but it's probably next offseason at the earliest before the team considers moving Adley if they ever would.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Adley is with the O's through 2026.   He probably averages catching 110 games per season.   That is 52 games a year for Basallo to catch while  learning from him.   Basallo can find the rest of his at bats from DH/1B.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, wildcard said:

I think Adley is with the O's through 2026.   He probably averages catching 110 games per season.   That is 52 games a year for Basallo to catch while  learning from him.   Basallo can find the rest of his at bats from DH/1B.

We control his rights through 2027.  It's fair to wonder if we would keep him for that final ARB 3 year though if he doesn't want to extend.  Better to get something rather than nothing if he walks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Aglets said:

We control his rights through 2027.  It's fair to wonder if we would keep him for that final ARB 3 year though if he doesn't want to extend.  Better to get something rather than nothing if he walks.

I'd say you have a very good chance to get a draft pick if he walks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, webbrick2010 said:

A bold and very Tampa Bay move would be to move Adley for pitching and slide in Basallo as catcher in 1 to 2 years

Adley looks to be a .260 ish 20 homer guy that is not  even a great defensive catcher who is already 26

Holy Crap, he's had one full year in MLB.  In Mauer's first full year he had an OPS of .783.  Adley was .809 after a debut of .806.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, cridolphi said:

Holy Crap, he's had one full year in MLB.  In Mauer's first full year he had an OPS of .783.  Adley was .809 after a debut of .806.

Not sure it's fair to compare a HS catcher that debuted at 21 with a college catcher that debuted at 24.

That being said Webbrick has this odd issue with Adley and has since he was drafted.  He'll spin anything as negatively as he can.

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I'd say you have a very good chance to get a draft pick if he walks.

Fair enough.  I would revise my priorities this way:

 

Trade package worth more than a draft pick  >  a draft pick >  nothing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, webbrick2010 said:

A bold and very Tampa Bay move would be to move Adley for pitching and slide in Basallo as catcher in 1 to 2 years

Adley looks to be a .260 ish 20 homer guy that is not  even a great defensive catcher who is already 26

I’m going to ignore the second paragraph, which is ludicrous.  

I do think it would be a Raysian thing to do to trade Adley about two years from now and hand the C position to Basallo.  Adley would certainly return a huge haul.  
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Aglets said:

Fair enough.  I would revise my priorities this way:

 

Trade package worth more than a draft pick  >  a draft pick >  nothing

Yeah, but with the draft pick you also get Adley’s 6th year with the team as opposed to 5 years and whoever comes in the trade.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ShoelesJoe said:

The thing that jumps out at me with this video is how many of these HRs were hit off lefties. Are Basallo's L/R splits unusual? 

2023 season
 

.844 vs. LHP (3 hr)

.978 vs RHP (17 hr)

Edited by RZNJ
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Frobby said:

I’m going to ignore the second paragraph, which is ludicrous.  

I do think it would be a Raysian thing to do to trade Adley about two years from now and hand the C position to Basallo.  Adley would certainly return a huge haul.  
 

Frobby, I have respect for your statements

What is ludicrous?

He is going into his 26 yo season

He did hit 20 Hrs last year in 687 plate appearances

His dWar (BBref) was 0.2 above replacement level

He did hit .277 career .268, so would it not be ludicrous if I said he is a .270 ish hitter

His EV, HH%, LD%, etc are all at MLB average

It is true that I was not a fan of the AR pick, but I believe he is a good not great player that we should consider trading before he gets close to FA especially if Basallo continues to develop.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, webbrick2010 said:

Frobby, I have respect for your statements

What is ludicrous?

He is going into his 26 yo season

He did hit 20 Hrs last year in 687 plate appearances

His dWar (BBref) was 0.2 above replacement level

He did hit .277 career .268, so would it not be ludicrous if I said he is a .270 ish hitter

His EV, HH%, LD%, etc are all at MLB average

It is true that I was not a fan of the AR pick, but I believe he is a good not great player that we should consider trading before he gets close to FA especially if Basallo continues to develop.

You're making some true statements but to measure Adley as a player you need to factor in his OBP skills and the typical offensive output for catchers. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Spy Fox said:

You're making some true statements but to measure Adley as a player you need to factor in his OBP skills and the typical offensive output for catchers. 

That's fair OBP is his ++ skill. I wonder with his general lack of power (EV, HH%) whether he will be able to maintain his BB rate

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • A player who is a FA after this year TB is not going to care where he goes. That said they only have Armstrong and Rosario. Potentially Maton. 
    • I don't think we really need to trade for CF just because we have so much depth at COF. We could promote Mayo or Kjerstad permanently and just see how they shake out, which wouldn't offensively be as bad as Mullins has been this year. Slide over Cowser to CF if we can't find that good a deal, and then go for anothter SP arm and some more depth in the pen. They don't trade Basallo because (and this is just me speculating) that they could move on from either Mountcastle or O'Hearn in the 2025-2026 offseason depending on if they can get a good return on them, like what we saw Tampa do with Austin Meadows a couple years back and the Orioles have a backup to replace said bat or bats.  In terms of who we go for, I don't really know. I don't like the idea of reuniting with Tanner Scott because his control issues and walk rate are still very present. I'm not in love with the idea of going for Kopech because the numbers and peripherals are average at best.  Carlos Estavez from the Angels, sure but how high is that asking price going to be? Whoever sells come deadline time could be interesting, as teams like the Cubs and Tigers could potentially be sellers come deadline time. Maybe even the mighty Astros who haven't been as good this year could be persuaded to sell off some talent depending on who we make available. It's a little to early to tell as of right now due to a good chunk of the sport sitting at around 500, but who knows at this point? 
    • I don’t think it will meaningfully affect who they are looking to deal at the trade deadline. The Orioles will be more inclined to include guys who they aren’t planning to add to the 40 as the last pieces in a deal, but there isn’t a huge crunch that means they NEED to clear 40 man roster space. Of all the guys after Hays on that list, I think Strowd and Young are the only ones who are high probability of being added right now. None of the other borderline guys have much trade value at all. Note Baker is out of options next year, he’s going to have to pitch well the rest of the year to warrant his spot.  I also think Luis González is going to get a look at some point and will ultimately become the new Vespi for 2025, optionable lefty riding the Norfolk shuttle. 
    • Yea, for this season. As I said, any of those guys are capable for a season or 2 but the odds are that they won’t live up to larger contracts and that you don’t want to get into expensive deals with guys like that.
    • Good question. I have been so focused on this season I have given zero thought to the 40 Man and Rule 5. I think Santander gets QO and O'Hearn goes FA. We could lose both. I don't really see any young guys that "must" be protected other than Mayo, McDermott, and S. Johnson. D. Johnson is having a nice season as CF is a need but not sure he belongs on the 40 man. Davidson is having a nice season. I could see him taking a deep depth spot to replace Zimmermann.     
    • I wonder if he could comp with the glove to a guy like Alec Bohm? Big dude, not a great defender, but doesn't kill his team and makes some great plays along the way with the glove while mashing with the bat.
    • That's good. By the time he gets back he'll almost 31, so there's some age decline uncertainty to go with the health uncertainty. I certainly won't be counting on him for anything. But you can hope 2 years of light workload (and a reinforced ligament) will rejuvenate him. 
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...