Jump to content

My biggest fear for 2024


ChuckS

Recommended Posts

53 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

I’ve said it before a few dozen times here but this thread is a good example:

If the Orioles won the World Series in 5 games some people here would be upset that it wasn’t won in 4. 

Or, the Orioles don't drastically change the roster to win another WS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ChuckS said:

How often do major trades happen between OD and the end of July? 

Or are you suggesting Hyde will see the light, and have a quick hook for underperforming vets in favor of giving high upside rookies a chance to play?

I was not talking about trades.  I am talking about promotions.

I think Elias/Hyde may be a little faster to put players on the IL if he has players behind them that are ready to play in the majors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My biggest fear for 2024 has nothing to do with baseball, but since this is an Orioles forum and not a politics forum, I’ll stick to the Orioles.  

My biggest fear in 2024 has nothing to do with the OP.  My fear is that we don’t acquire more pitching and then suffer significant injuries or disappointments with our staff.  

As others have pointed out, the only way the players mentioned get buried or sit on the bench is if our veterans are playing very well and we are winning.  That is not something I worry about.  

 

  • Upvote 1
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ChuckS said:

No significant trades are made.

Mateo, Urias, Mountcastle, and O’Hearn all make the big league roster. 

Hyde, who has shown a tendency to ride-out players with tenure regardless of their performance, continues to give the above guys significant playing time for much of the season.

Ortiz, Norby, Cowser, and Kjerstad rot in  Triple A or get buried on the bench in Baltimore.  

Mayo and Holliday arrivals are further delayed. 

How likely is this all to happen?

Wondering what you mean by riding out players with tenure. Mateo and Frazier were bench by the end of the season. Whatever their weaknesses they both ended up with positive WAR for the season. Mateo saw his AB's cut back in June, then became a bench player. Frazier had an .871 in July. Arguably Kjerstad and Cowser could have played more, but Hays, Santander, and Hicks all performed well. Can't really fault Hyde for sticking with them. Maybe we could have played some of the young guys earlier, but that is mostly on Elias, not Hyde, and even so our guys put up 100+ wins so I don't think you can say it was regardless of performance. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ChuckS said:

It could be pretty poor if there was potential for 100-105 wins otherwise.  

Anyway, my OP asked how likely all this was to happen.  I didn't ask what number of wins would make you blindly satisfied with roster construction and management. 

It is a spectrum .. if 95 and out in wild card game vs 95 and run the table as wild card and win WS.
 

i would agree with the argument more with the first and I couldn’t care less who sits in AAA if the second occurs 

Edited by tntoriole
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Frobby said:

My biggest fear for 2024 has nothing to do with baseball, but since this is an Orioles forum and not a politics forum, I’ll stick to the Orioles.  

My biggest fear in 2024 has nothing to do with the OP.  My fear is that we don’t acquire more pitching and then suffer significant injuries or disappointments with our staff.  

As others have pointed out, the only way the players mentioned get buried or sit on the bench is if our veterans are playing very well and we are winning.  That is not something I worry about.  

 

Agreed on all points. 
 

Honestly, my biggest fear is some disaster and missing the playoffs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ChuckS said:

No significant trades are made.

Mateo, Urias, Mountcastle, and O’Hearn all make the big league roster. 

Hyde, who has shown a tendency to ride-out players with tenure regardless of their performance, continues to give the above guys significant playing time for much of the season.

Ortiz, Norby, Cowser, and Kjerstad rot in  Triple A or get buried on the bench in Baltimore.  

Mayo and Holliday arrivals are further delayed. 

How likely is this all to happen?

Does this mean that the Orioles gain an extra year of control over Ortiz, Norby, Cowser and Kjerstad (and I assume Holliday too)?

I know that's a frustrating consideration and it would probably not be well received by players, but the GM would have just extended the FV of this group another year. There are worse outcomes to fear, IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Aristotelian said:

Wondering what you mean by riding out players with tenure. Mateo and Frazier were bench by the end of the season. Whatever their weaknesses they both ended up with positive WAR for the season. Mateo saw his AB's cut back in June, then became a bench player. Frazier had an .871 in July. Arguably Kjerstad and Cowser could have played more, but Hays, Santander, and Hicks all performed well. Can't really fault Hyde for sticking with them. Maybe we could have played some of the young guys earlier, but that is mostly on Elias, not Hyde, and even so our guys put up 100+ wins so I don't think you can say it was regardless of performance. 

Not really.  Mateo was still starting a full third of the games.  That was still WAY too much and not exactly just a bench player.  I fully agree with the OP that sometimes he sticks with his vets way too long and way too much, even when their role is 'lessened' they still get way too many at bats.  I know we won 100 games, but even with that I don't think the roster, lineups and management was perfect in the way they handled some of the situations.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, ChuckS said:

No significant trades are made.

Mateo, Urias, Mountcastle, and O’Hearn all make the big league roster. 

Hyde, who has shown a tendency to ride-out players with tenure regardless of their performance, continues to give the above guys significant playing time for much of the season.

Ortiz, Norby, Cowser, and Kjerstad rot in  Triple A or get buried on the bench in Baltimore.  

Mayo and Holliday arrivals are further delayed. 

How likely is this all to happen?

This is exactly what I am expecting and people are fooling themselves if they think this won't happen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

My biggest fear in 2024 has nothing to do with the OP.  My fear is that we don’t acquire more pitching and then suffer significant injuries or disappointments with our staff.  
 

I agree with this.  This is a scenario that is more likely to lead to the O's missing the playoffs, if it occurs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Three Run Homer said:

I agree with this.  This is a scenario that is more likely to lead to the O's missing the playoffs, if it occurs.

Yes but I feel like it leads back to OP. Because they won't trade any of the prospects to get a pitcher (regardless if its Cease or someone else), yet they will just be stashed in AAA. I have no interest in the Tides being champions again. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Pickles said:

Is it a waste though if you're winning 95 games?  Isn't that the point of having a good farm system?  Winning games?

it worked so well after 2014.  I mean 96 wins!  I think the O's won the World Series in 2015 because 96 wins. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, ChuckS said:

No significant trades are made.

Mateo, Urias, Mountcastle, and O’Hearn all make the big league roster. 

Hyde, who has shown a tendency to ride-out players with tenure regardless of their performance, continues to give the above guys significant playing time for much of the season.

Ortiz, Norby, Cowser, and Kjerstad rot in  Triple A or get buried on the bench in Baltimore.  

Mayo and Holliday arrivals are further delayed. 

How likely is this all to happen?

Very likely if no trades are made that this is exactly what will happen, except the O's will sign a veteran bat to further muddle the picture.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I would be OK with this and it’s what Hyde was doing with Kimbrel in a way too. We’ve got guys that can match up, let’s try to take advantage. 
    • A 90 win season with Grayson missing at least 10 starts, Means and Bradish missing at least 20 each.  Throw in Tyler Wells missing most of the season and other injuries I think this team and its management has done well.  If just a little more healthy they could have had back to back 100 win seasons.  I am glad we have Mike Elias and Brandon Hyde leading this team.  
    • Some interesting things of note from https://www.samford.edu/sports-analytics/fans/2023/Sabermetrics-101-Understanding-the-Calculation-of-WAR. I pulled out the relevant areas: Fangraphs allocates 570 WAR for position players and 430 WAR for pitchers, while Baseball-Reference allocates 590 WAR for position players and 410 WAR for pitchers The major difference between fWAR and bWAR comes from the measurement of fielding runs, which is the defensive output a player provides. Fangraphs uses a statistic called Ultimate Zone Rating (UZR), while Baseball-Reference uses a statistics called Defensive Runs Saved (DRS). The differences in these stats can lead to drastically different calculations in WAR for some position players. UZR takes into account 3 years of players’ data as well as MLB data to determine these percentages, whereas DRS uses essentially 1 year of data. Therefore, some rookies will have drastically different UZR and DRS stats. As opposed to positional players, Fangraphs and Baseball-Reference take drastically different steps in calculating the WAR of pitchers. It does not follow the formula for position players but does try to calculate the “wins” that a pitcher gives to their team. Instead, they use a “base” statistic to help calculate WAR. Fangraphs uses FIP, or fielding independent pitching, as its base for calculating pitchers' WAR, whereas Baseball-Reference focuses on Runs Allowed per 9 innings (RA9) for its base I think the main takeaway for Gil, bWAR likes him more than FanGraphs probably because FG aims to take the defensive element out of the calculation by centering on FIP. And if we look at FIP, his is close to 4. But Baseball Reference is using RA9 which does have a defensive element inherently calculated. As for Cowser, I reckon FG likes him more than BBRef particularly on the defensive metric side of things. Maybe BBRef is harsher on the DRS side than FG is on the UZR side. To me, I like FG for pitchers far more than BBRef. For position players, I’d give the nod to FG but mainly because I think DRS can have some wide swings where UZR has a tendency to be more centered.
    • Win game 1, Kremer/Suarez game 2, win game 2, Eflin game 1 ALDS? Win game 1, Kremer/Suraez game 2, lose game 2, Eflin game 3? Lose game 1, Eflin game 2?
    • The win tonight in game 161 allowed the 2023-24 Orioles to reach 191 wins, tied with the 1964-65 and 1965-66 teams for the 7th most wins in consecutive seasons.  With a win tomorrow, they could move up to a tie for 5th. Tonight’s win also gave the O’s 275 wins over the last 3 seasons, tied for 11th with the 1975-77 and 1976-78 O’s.  They could move into a tie for 10th with a win tomorrow.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...