Jump to content

Elias' mental shift


wildcard

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, wildcard said:

JA would not have to fire anyone.  He could just say no deal.  

Bassitt signed for for 3/63m last off season.  The O's were reported in on the deal.  Bassitt made 33 S, 200 IP, 16-8, 3.60 ERA and a WHIP of 1.175.   He would have been a playoff pitcher for the O's.

But the O's didn't sign him after Elias worked hard of the pursuit.   Did JA not want to spend the money?

Totally different situation and we don’t know the answer.   Anyway, it’s not at all clear how hard we pursued Bassitt.  The guy signed on December 16.  I don’t remember the O’s being seriously linked to him, just the typical “O’s have expressed interest” tweets you might hear about a dozen pitchers every offseason.   It’s pretty clear here that the O’s pursued Burnes hard all winter, and a lot of the holdup was the Brewers’ desire internal ambivalence about trading him at all.  Even Burnes said he heard that.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, wildcard said:

JA would not have to fire anyone.  He could just say no deal.  

Bassitt signed for for 3/63m last off season.  The O's were reported in on the deal.  Bassitt made 33 S, 200 IP, 16-8, 3.60 ERA and a WHIP of 1.175.   He would have been a playoff pitcher for the O's.

But the O's didn't sign him after Elias worked hard of the pursuit.   Did JA not want to spend the money?

Do you think Elias likes to waste his time and embarrass himself by pursuing players, especially ones when he knows exactly how much they’ll be making, to find out later it’s not in his budget?   Doesn’t it make more sense that Mr. Thorough, Mr. Meticulous, Mike Elias knows exactly what he can or can’t do before he does it?    He said that he and Angelos have been working on the trade together the whole time.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, wildcard said:

I don't think the deal with the White Sox ever got that far.  They could not agree on the players to  be traded.  The White Sox wanted players the O's would not trade from the reports I have read.

The conversation would have never gotten started if Elias couldn’t add the cease salary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, wildcard said:

I think its easy in hindsight for fans to say that the Burnes deal in one the O's had to make.   However with John Angelos involved its not a no brainer that he would trade two players making 740K each for the next 3 years that were ready to contribute to the 2024 O's for one year on a pitcher making 15m.   Trading away 12 years of control for one year of control may not have be approved by Angelos.

It would not be hard to think that Angelos would turn that deal down to save money.

Oh he absolutely could have said no to it…when it was first presented to him.

Elias isn’t going to spend a bunch of time on this without knowing if the contract would get picked up.   Not to mention, he’s not going to risk alienated another franchise because he wasted their time.

Edited by Sports Guy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Part of the mental shift of Elias knowing that he has a bit more payroll is that he theoretically doesn’t have to hold onto every possible prospect as deep depth. We can tap into our depth/spare parts. 

Baumann, Stowers, and Norby should all be available if we could snag a RH reliever. Preferably with options. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, wildcard said:

JA would not have to fire anyone.  He could just say no deal.  

Bassitt signed for for 3/63m last off season.  The O's were reported in on the deal.  Bassitt made 33 S, 200 IP, 16-8, 3.60 ERA and a WHIP of 1.175.   He would have been a playoff pitcher for the O's.

But the O's didn't sign him after Elias worked hard of the pursuit.   Did JA not want to spend the money?

Why on Earth would JA kill the Burnes deal under the circumstances?  I doubt the additional $6 million is going to be his burden, and I don’t think the deal took place without his approval anyway.

Chris Bassitt is irrelevant to the Burnes acquisition. 

If the current exercise is spotting mental shifts from a distance, perhaps John Angelos is a more sporting proposition.  The impact of his pending exit is certainly is a more satisfying one to think about. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

“Elias has done something he’s never done before.”

Well, he’s never traded for Corbin Burnes before. But we have seen years of control traded for veteran pitchers. Irvin. Flaherty. Burnes is just better. Wildcard is just surprised how much better Burnes is than the other guys. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Matt Bennett said:

“Elias has done something he’s never done before.”

Well, he’s never traded for Corbin Burnes before. But we have seen years of control traded for veteran pitchers. Irvin. Flaherty. Burnes is just better. Wildcard is just surprised how much better Burnes is than the other guys. 

Yep..he has been saying we should just get Lorenzen..a potential slight upgrade from Gibson. 
 

His surprise is more because he doesn’t agree with this move. He hasn’t agreed with it all offseason. He just isn’t saying it for some reason. Instead he’s twisting it into this idea that Elias has decided to change how he is doing things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Matt Bennett said:

“Elias has done something he’s never done before.”

Well, he’s never traded for Corbin Burnes before. But we have seen years of control traded for veteran pitchers. Irvin. Flaherty. Burnes is just better. Wildcard is just surprised how much better Burnes is than the other guys. 

Ortiz and Hall were both top prospects at some point.   Hernaiz was never more than 26th on the O's top 30 list.  Huge difference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/3/2024 at 8:31 AM, wildcard said:

I am pretty far away from thinking the Os are going to spend 250m to extend Burnes into his late 30s. I think he is more likely to extend young players like Gunnar and Holliday.

Love your "will be 26".   I will be 100 one day if I live that long.   Hall and Ortiz are both 25 and were projected to have spots on the 2024 26 man roster.   Who knows how the season would have progressed for them had they stayed.

I am not saying that Elias made the wrong move.   I am saying he has made a mental shift from collecting young talent and guarding all of them to focusing on what he needs to do win the World Series.

In the past Elias might have kept Hall and traded Ortiz if he was blocked for more young talent.   

 

I think if anything, the Flaherty deal evidenced this shift in thinking.  Or trading Hernaiz for Irvin.  I don't think the Burnes trade evidences anything except what we all knew Elias was doing/trying to do. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Ortiz and Hall were both top prospects at some point.   Hernaiz was never more than 26th on the O's top 30 list.  Huge difference.

Burnes is better than Irvin and Flaherty so the return must be better than Prieto, Hernaiz, Rom, Showalter. 

But the action has been done before. The scale changed.

You’ve backtracked from your OP. You said Elias has only hoarded prospects since 2018 and this trade was counter to everything he had done so far. How do you explain Irvin and Flaherty then? What exactly has Elias never done before? Your answer seems to be getting narrower and narrower. 

Also, it’s just silly to extrapolate any decision making and strategy from 2018-2022 into 2023+. Why would you think any transactions made during that tear down/rebuilding phase those are analogous data points?  

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Ortiz and Hall were both top prospects at some point.   Hernaiz was never more than 26th on the O's top 30 list.  Huge difference.

And that’s why Hernaiz only gets you Irvin, while we were able to get Burnes with Ortiz and Hall.
 

In my opinion, I don’t think this trade itself is so much a mental shift for Elias, but, now that he was able to make the trade, it becomes a shift for him and the team to more of a win now mentality.  He’s been trying to make these types of trades most likely since last offseason, and definitely since the trade deadline last year. Now that we have our Ace, I wouldn’t be surprised to see another trade for a top reliever by the trade deadline.

So, to your point, I can see why you say there has been a shift, but I think the shift you are talking about happened sometime last season and Elias just wasn’t able to find a trade he liked so he settled for Flaherty. I think part of what seems like a mental shift is the constant shifting of value for players. Perhaps Elias wasn’t as willing to part with Ortiz last offseason, but now that he he’s seen how good Henderson can be at short Ortiz became more expendable. There are a lot of factors, but I don’t think he’s suddenly deciding to go all in now, it’s more just the value finally aligned correctly for this type of trade to happen. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Clearly. But this is like saying you disagree with the fundamental notion of positional adjustments used in WAR.
    • Baseball America - “Jackson Holliday’s One Flaw” Orioles shortstop Jackson Holliday is the No. 1 prospect in baseball. He’s the reigning Minor League Player of the Year. The year before that he was High School Player of the Year. He enters 2024 as one of the favorites to be the American League Rookie of the Year. The 20-year-old is an outstanding prospect and should be one of the better players in baseball over the next decade. It’s hard not to get excited about Holliday’s potential. But no player is perfect. In Holliday’s case, his one blemish is worth monitoring as he competes for a spot in Baltimore’s Opening Day lineup at second base or shortstop. It also explains why he’s not viewed as a potential third baseman. Holliday’s arm is short for shortstop at this point in his young career. Players can improve arm strength with healthy doses of long toss or other training techniques. But right now, arm strength is the only big question for the top prospect in baseball. Holliday has quick hands, a fast exchange and quick release. His body control is excellent and he seems to have the ability to know where everyone is on the diamond, even when he’s running with his back to home plate to try to run down a fly ball. As a savvy and advanced player for his age, Holliday figures out ways to ensure that his arm is rarely a hindrance. He has mastered a hip slide that allows him to pop up and throw when needed. But he rarely lets it rip on a throw.  In his month at Triple-A Norfolk to end the 2023 season, Holliday averaged 78.4 mph on his throws from shortstop, as tracked by MLB Statcast. His fastest throw on any play in the infield was 83.1 mph. The league average for MLB shortstops was 86.3 mph, according to Statcast. Elly De La Cruz and Masyn Winn are outliers on the upper end of the range. De La Cruz averaged 95 mph on his throws and topped out at 100, while Winn averaged 92.4.  But of the 65 MLB shortstops who had enough throws to qualify for a Statcast ranking in 2023, just three—Nick Ahmed, Thairo Estrada and David Fletcher—averaged throws slower than Holliday’s 78.4 mph. And 38 of the 65 qualified MLB shortstops had a higher average velocity on their throws than Holliday’s max throw of 83.1 mph. To get a better understanding of Holliday’s defensive ability, I watched well over 100 plays he made in the minors in 2023, including every televised extra-effort play, every non-routine throw and every ball at shortstop where he fielded the ball moving to his right. Watching that many plays, I saw a lot of what makes Holliday special. With two outs in a tie game in the 11th inning against Hudson Valley, Holliday saved the game for High-A Aberdeen with his savvy. Spencer Jones was running from second on a slow chopper well to Holliday’s left. Holliday realized he wasn’t going to be able to throw out the runner at first, but he decoyed a throw anyway, then spun and fired home to nab Jones by five feet. Aberdeen then won the game in the 12th. You see numerous examples of Holliday’s feel for the game. He knows when he can take his time on a throw and when he needs to get rid of it quickly. He seemed to be in sync with a wide variety of double-play partners, which was a necessity for a player who played at four different levels. Holliday’s range to his left is excellent. He regularly ranges beyond second base to make plays on choppers that would be tough for a second baseman going to his right to turn into outs. He is equally adept at coming in on choppers, fielding and throwing in one fluid and quick motion. Holliday also has soft and sure hands. He made just 13 errors all season. That range also plays into his ability to cover for his arm. At shortstop, he often sets up shaded significantly toward third base when a righthanded hitter bats with the bases empty. In these situations, he doesn’t have to worry about covering second base on a ball hit to an infielder.
    • Kinda surprised he isn't also a veteran. 
    • OnlyOneOriole challenged him to post a photo of himself.   There ya go.
    • Your statistical case is pretty convincing, but I hesitate to judge him harshly without having watched him play a lot.    
    • I disagree and Westburg isn’t “just average” at second.
    • 30 days for a pitcher. 20 days for position player. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...