Jump to content

Kyle Stowers 2024


Jagwar

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

 I don't know if the Orioles would go through with this plan, but Mullins is badly in need of a reset. This is his stat line since July 1st last season through yesterday.

In 360 plate appearances Mullins is batting .199/.246/.360 with a 67 wRC+.

https://www.fangraphs.com/players/cedric-mullins-ii/17929/game-log?position=OF&gds=2023-07-01&gde=2024-05-22&season=

image.thumb.png.fc6074ae56434707be8544f505cb2578.png

And in that same time frame, Hays is 212/276/343. 71 wRC+. 337 PA 

Basically 700 PA of 610 OPS ball and and a wRC+ around 69.

That’s a lot of bad hitting from 2 key players.
 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Sports Guy said:

And in that same time frame, Hays is 212/276/343. 71 wRC+. 337 PA 

Basically 700 PA of 610 OPS ball and and a wRC+ around 69.

That’s a lot of bad hitting from 2 key players.
 

And on top of that Santander is putting up a .564 OPS versus RHP this year, but he's hitting 1.027 OPS against LHP. The outfield is a problem and there's no reason Stowers shouldn't be seeing significant playing time if he's going to be on the the roster.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

And in that same time frame, Hays is 212/276/343. 71 wRC+. 337 PA 

Basically 700 PA of 610 OPS ball and and a wRC+ around 69.

That’s a lot of bad hitting from 2 key players.

And they were two of the team's better hitters in the first half last year. At that July 1 date both were still over .800 OPS. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

I've always been on the Stowers' band wagon and while i do think he comes with a significant whiff (so does Cowser) he's going to produce if given regular playing time.

Same. I think he's capable of being a 20+ HR guy with regular AB's. 

 

Right now he doesn't have to be Barry Bonds in order to be an upgrade over any of the 3. It's a plus that he hits lefties at a decent clip too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Spy Fox said:

And they were two of the team's better hitters in the first half last year. At that July 1 date both were still over .800 OPS. 

Yep..I thought Mullins was directly due to injuries but maybe not. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Malike said:

They'd lead the league in chase, whiff and K%. 😂

At first, sure.  Give them some time to adjust and see if they can figure things out.  Ordinarily I wouldn't tell a team trying to win a WS to do this, but given how little we're getting from Hays, Cedric and Santander (against RHP), why not?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

And on top of that Santander is putting up a .564 OPS versus RHP this year, but he's hitting 1.027 OPS against LHP. The outfield is a problem and there's no reason Stowers shouldn't be seeing significant playing time if he's going to be on the the roster.

But they are vets with a long track record (kinda).  They should be given TONS to rope to hang themselves....err, tons of time to get right before cutting their playing time much at all!  Right?  🙂  Besides, the team is leading the league in scoring and we are winning at a great clip (ignoring recent games of course) so why should we make any changes!?!?!??!  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was listening to the game on radio yesterday and Steve Melewski mentioned how he talked to both Stowers and Hyde before the game.

Stowers feels really confident, his time is now, can contribute to the MLB team on a daily basis if allowed.

Hyde said he would like to play Stowers nearly everyday if possible; liked the way he swung the bat in St. Louis but he believes he still needs to find ways to get Mullins and Hays going as they are veterans so he will pick his spots to get Stowers his starts.

Thought I pass this along in case anyone interested..

  • Upvote 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Natty said:

After 3 consecutive hits today, I wonder if Stowers will stay in the lineup or go back to sitting on the bench? 

He must play. Now..Lefties or righties...I dont care.He puts the bat on the ball...thats what we need, fewer K's more contact...

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Roy Firestone said:

He must play. Now..Lefties or righties...I dont care.He puts the bat on the ball...thats what we need, fewer K's more contact...

Hyde rides the hot hand so hopefully this was the game Stowers needed to start getting some AB's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

I'm glad Stowers had a great game but he had a 111 wRC+ in AAA at 26 years old. Holliday has a 134 wRC+ as a 20-year-old. In a league that has terrible pitching, Stowers struck out 27% of the time and was batting .240 with an OBP of .315, he was slugging which has never been the question but still has an OPS lower than Holliday despite being 6 years older. I'd be a little guarded in the hyperbole surrounding this sample size.

Edited by Malike
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I have not seen any reports of a limit on the number of qualifying offers a team can make.   I disagree that Santander is unlikely to receive a QO, or that he will accept it if he gets one.  Of course, it depends how the rest of his season plays out.  But I’ve been on record that if Santander has a season as good as the last two (120/121 OPS+), he should get a QO and will turn it down.  Right now he’s at 131 OPS+, so we’ll see how it goes from here.  
    • I was curious how GRod would pitch given that huge crowd and electric atmosphere. I feel like he has a tendency to get too amped up and overthrow. Granted I didn’t start watching until inning 3, but he looked absolutely in control and executed his pitches.  Certainly a big step forward as far as I’m concerned.
    • Unless Santander goes on an absolute tear the rest of the season, I don't think he turns down a qualifying offer. And even then, it'd be real easy to look at FA deals for 30-ish year old outfielders who are good regulars but not stars and realize there's a good chance he won't beat a QO in guaranteed money, especially with a QO attached. As much as I'd like the pick, I don't want to gamble 20-30M and another year of stunted opportunity for our young outfielders on Santander turning down a QO.
    • Yeah, it's getting to the point where I'm not going to cry if McDermott finishes the year in AAA. I'm not against bringing him up necessarily, but he's clearly got more work to do on control/command if he wants to be a good major league starter long-term.
    • Are there any other qualifications other than signing a contract for 50+M?  A contract of that value spread over 3-4 years would give him a raise and make other teams give some consideration to sign him.  I think that's the only way a QO would work for him.  But I don't think they put him in jeopardy - altho the Orioles could match an offer, I suppose.  I think they value him pretty highly even if he won't command top money. 
    • I did say "unlikely" before "no matter what." Now that I re-read that though, it's kind of a bizarre sentence so I can see why you interpreted it that way. Of course there's a shot a player taken at 1-22 succeeds. Elias is certainly above average at drafting, possibly well above average, but the odds are still against him here, as they are for pretty much any individual pick he makes. I'm not trying to knock Elias here, just stating the fact that the vast majority of players selected in the back of the first round don't turn into solid regulars and so you shouldn't pass up someone you think is more likely to succeed here to draft "for need." I'm certain someone who will be available at this pick will have an incredible major league career. The odds are against it being whoever we draft though. That's just math.
    • I used to think we had a plethora of outfielders ready to replace the current guys, but not I'm not sure. Cowser is one. Does the FO trust Stowers? Heston is another as far as his bat goes, but how bad is the defense if you have Stowers, Cowser and Heston? How long before Bradfield is ready? Will Norby or Mayo move to the OF? Does that make it any better. If Santander has his typical year, I would give him the QO. So what if you have to pay him large for one year? It's not like our payroll is high right now.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...