-
Who's Online 71 Members, 0 Anonymous, 168 Guests (See full list)
- Cheetos
- Pushmonkey
- deward
- Spy Fox
- OsFanInOhio
- Hazmat
- RZNJ
- G54377
- CallMeBrooksie
- SilverRocket
- Absltgreek
- duffman003
- Can_of_corn
- KojiSplit
- Rbiggs2525
- bpilktree
- Tony-OH
- clapdiddy
- EddeeEddee
- Ripken
- blue32
- UMDTerrapins
- NedFromYork
- Matt Bennett
- CaptainRedbeard
- IllinoisOsFan
- RarityFlaherty
- schittenden
- Delbird
- 25 Nuggets
- EERinthe804
- OriolesMagic83
- calsmanystances
- Aglets
- e16bball
- jamesenoch
- Chicago White Sox
- Greg Pappas
- owknows
- Bemorewins
- jerios55
- Sports Guy
- LGOrioles
- Hallas
- Looch
- Orioles1954
- paulcoates
- Oriole40
- andymax
- joelala
- allquixotic
- OsFanSinceThe80s
- Conway12
- Pruke
- Sovaosfan
- RichmondOsFan
- skanar
- Surhoffan17
- HowAboutThat
- oriole
- O's84
- Coker
- Chaka Garcia
- Jagwar
- Frobby
- glenn__davis
- Aristotelian
- Gerard19
- accinfo
- Sydnor
- OHearn4Prez
-
Posts
-
By OsFanInOhio · Posted
Ah. So you can only get one pick per player? That’s a bummer. Reasonable, I suppose. But a bummer nonetheless -
By Greg Pappas · Posted
It's true that this has been discussed, and there are differing schools of thought. Some, like myself, feel that the resources required in a Crochet deal, might be better served addressing a more impactful need for 2024: a ToR starter. As a starter beginning next season, it's likely Crochet's impact will be higher as a strong ToR starter through the final two years of control. In the meantime, there are quite a few very solid veteran late inning relievers that we could deal for in order to satisfy that need, and that wouldn't require near the cost of a Crochet. -
By Bemorewins · Posted
It makes sense to me for multiple reasons. 1) IMO we do not have the requisite pitching talent in order to matchup favorably against the leagues best in a 7 game series in October. That needs to change. 2) We don’t need extra offense IMO. Nor a back up catcher. We will be fine offensively if we don’t have one considering without both we are number one in the sport. 3) We could resign Burnes with that 50 million (not sure where you are getting that number). But so many here believe it will be a bad deal. And having another #1 in house protects us from having to be leveraged against signing him. -
By Sports Guy · Posted
Starter and then reliever and then back to starter. Risky risky risky. -
By Rbiggs2525 · Posted
Why do we need to outbid someone for Skubal? We still have Bradish and Grayson for years to come. Also a punchers chance at resigning Corbin Burnes. You know what our record was before we signed Burnes? Best record in the AL. You know what our record has been since Bradish got hurt? Tracked down Yankees and took 3 game lead. We have resources to sign players next year. Elias is a value vs risk guy. He got Burnes with Joey Ortiz which is a top 50-60 prospect. He’s not giving up top 10 prospect for a player with 178 innings pitched. I like Crochet a lot but his track record isn’t long enough. -
By Sports Guy · Posted
You can sign a Chris Bassitt/Eovaldi/Gray type guy and trade for someone else. If I were the Os, I would be trying to acquire a pitcher like Detmers, Cabrera, etc…someone with a great arm that we can take away from a garbage org and “fix them”. I also think a Luzardo deal could happen as I could see the Os trying to pry him away for 70 cents on the dollar and I could see Miami saying, we need to do something with him. -
6-4 (54 RS, 34 RA) 7-3 (63 RS, 59 RA) 6-4 (40 RS, 28 RA) 7-3 (43 RS, 31 RA) 6-4 (48 RS, 38 RA) 7-3 (58 RS, 29 RA) 7-3 (50 RS, 28 RA) 4-6 (61 RS, 60 RA 7-3 (46 RS, 51 RA) 3-1 vs. TEX, 2-1 at SEA, 2-1 at OAK Three series wins following the first 10-game segment where the O’s had a losing record. The O’s were outvoted this segment thanks to yesterday’s 19-8 beatdown, but I’ll take 7-3 any day.
-
-
Popular Contributors
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
-
Popular Now
-
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.