Jump to content

On the record Poll: Hays or McKenna (Update: McKenna DFA'd (Claimed by Giants), Hays activated)


Tony-OH

On the record Poll: Hays or McKenna (Update: McKenna DFA'd (Claimed by Giants), Hays activated)  

154 members have voted

  1. 1. Hays or McKenna on the team this year?


This poll is closed to new votes

  • Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.
  • Poll closed on 05/18/24 at 20:09

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

Yes, good point, 8 out of 154 people voted that way, though I suspect at least a couple of them were just being contrarian for the hell of it.  

It's actually shocking to me it was that many.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Spy Fox said:

"Shut up and not complain" is your addition here. I don't really see SG or anyone else saying that in this thread. He just disagreed with one of your points about McKenna. 

Of course that is my interpretation of what he said. When I complained about McKenna being on the roster of a WS contender his reply was:

Quote

"Yet every team has guys like that.  So, your roster expectations are unrealistic and not founded on reality."

 You don't post things like that to further a discussion. You post those type of comments to shut people up. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Tony-OH changed the title to On the record Poll: Hays or McKenna (Update: McKenna DFA'd, Hays activated)
35 minutes ago, MCO'sFan said:

Of course that is my interpretation of what he said. When I complained about McKenna being on the roster of a WS contender his reply was:

 You don't post things like that to further a discussion. You post those type of comments to shut people up. 

I’m pointing out how unrealistic you are being. McKenna is a typical 25th/26th man that you see you on all teams.

Finding a better version of him is possible but most better versions will be guys that have larger roles. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

I’m pointing out how unrealistic you are being. McKenna is a typical 25th/26th man that you see you on all teams.

Finding a better version of him is possible but most better versions will be guys that have larger roles. 

This is my last post on this subject. I simply disagree with you. I think it is completely realistic to expect a defensive replacement to actually play consistently good defense. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, MCO'sFan said:

This is my last post on this subject. I simply disagree with you. I think it is completely realistic to expect a defensive replacement to actually play consistently good defense. 

Sure…but it’s not likely they hit as well or something like that, so your net gain is zero.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

Another team might acquire him and then try to pick his brain for "Orioles secrets" with development and preparation. It would go like this:

Team: "Welcome Ryan to the organization. We really are hopeful we can get you more playing time here."

Ryan: "Thanks, glad to be here. Glad to be with an organization that doesn't worry about little things like running the bases correctly, taking good routes, or understanding how to position myself for a key throw to the plate."

Team: "Um, well we do kinda want you to do those things. But anyways, so what are some of the things the Orioles do to prepare you for the game and what developmental tools are they using in the minors to get all these players producing so well in AAA?"

Ryan: "What? Not really sure what you are talking about. I've seen guys sitting in front of Ipads with the nerds, but I never worried about any of that stuff. You guys have an headband stores around these parts?"

Team: (Thinking in his head,) "What was my password to the waivers portal again?"

(Note: This was for entertainment purposes only. I have no idea whether McKenna used or bought in to the tools available to him.) 



 

Ryan: "So when are you going to take this Ferrari out of the garage for a drive? You don't purchase a high end sports car and not use it."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tony-OH said:



Peyton Burdick makes McKenna a little redundant as well as a 5th outfielder type. Burdick is a solid defensive outfielder who has a .903 OPS against AAA left-handers thanks to him popping some homers. Sound familiar? 

Peyton Burdick was DFA and claimed by the Reds several weeks ago.  😎

Anyway, I’m not going to spend a lot of time defending McKenna, I just thought some of the comments here and elsewhere were a little mean and personal.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RZNJ said:

7 huckleberries and revered poster gangsta gangsta voted for McKenna.

Thanks for calling me stupid. I laid out my rationale for why I preferred McKenna and it relates to Cowser’s playing time. Keep doing you though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Peyton Burdick was DFA and claimed by the Reds several weeks ago.  😎

Anyway, I’m not going to spend a lot of time defending McKenna, I just thought some of the comments here and elsewhere were a little mean and personal.  

I'll be honest, I didn't remember that. I could swear I saw him in a box score last week. Oh well. Hard to keep track of the amount of players Elias claims and then loses on waivers. 

Well, Mateo can play some centerfield in a pinch so if Hays went down, I guess they'll just have to live with Stowers hitting against those tough lefties and play left field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Sydnor said:

Thanks for calling me stupid. I laid out my rationale for why I preferred McKenna and it relates to Cowser’s playing time. Keep doing you though.

Huh?   It was a joke all to do with one of the posters being named (this is true) gangsta gangsta.   All respect to you, Moose, MurphDog, and whoever voted for McKenna who are all respected posters.   I have never seen a post from Mr. Or Ms. gangsta gangsta.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Huh?   It was a joke all to do with one of the posters being named (this is true) gangsta gangsta.   All respect to you, Moose, MurphDog, and whoever voted for McKenna who are all respected posters.   I have never seen a post from Mr. Or Ms. gangsta gangsta.   

Sorry. I missed the tone. It has been a rough week for reasons completely unrelated to the Orioles and I took that of context and sent an unnecessary reply. I see that now. No excuses. I’ll do better.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Getting to hear Jason Benetti, Carlos Pena and Kirk Gibson some of the afternoon was a treat. It was new to me earlier this year Gibson is still broadcasting almost a decade after his Parkinson's diagnosis...good for him. Benetti dumping the White Sox for the Tigers gives me some Miller to San Francisco vibes...he is excellent. Baseball as entertainment - it is wonderful that Carlos Pena, literally the player pushed aside so Scott Hatteberg could play offense more efficiently, has become a strong SABR-oriented analyst.
    • I don't think the rookies get to pick what the wear.  I 100% am sure the vets are picking these outfits.  
    • I’d be shocked if the O’s do better than 2-4, and I’m half expecting them to go 1-5.
    • Worst female impersonator ever!
    • I watched the inning where the Tigers scored their 2 runs.  Our friend Meadows had two check swings that easily could have been called strikes, but instead he walked to load the bases.  Carpenter popped out but then Perez had an insane at-bat where he fouled off a ton of pitches, wasn't fooled by anything, and then delivered a bases loaded double which proved to be the difference. Our guys would likely have whiffed on just about every pitch in those at-bats, but their guys have a crazy amount of confidence right now and it has served them very well.   I do think they have a good chance of winning out and ending with 88 just based on who they play, which means we have to go 3-3 this week or we are out of the 4 spot.  Hopefully their luck will finally run out against us (assuming we can win enough to get in), but if it doesn't, I would love to see them knock out the Yankees.
    • If they played baseball another month maybe. Elias has been pretty much no comment on anything other than time is not on his. His last Lat issues had him control problems ( I Believe ) when he first came back. I'm just happy to have the others back.
    • 6 games left, they haven’t won more than one game in a series since the beginning of the month (against the White Sox for context). I see no reason to think they’ll do any better than 2-4 for remainder of the season.    Plus, i said it “feels” like. It’s an emotional response, not an analytical one. I’m going off the premise that they’ve been an absolute mess for quite a while and a playoff spot seems like a weird place to be for a team that’s played .400 ball since the All Star Break.  They could sweep the rest of the season, who knows? Just saying it feels bleak. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...