Jump to content

The 2024 Trade Deadline


Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

All this post says is, who cares about the quality or cost, just get an arm because we are desperate.

Taillon wouldn’t be a good get. Hes an if all else fails type guy in the offseason 

I think this is exactly the opposite. We know exactly what the cost would be ($$ and in this case the prospect), and this is a pitcher with a track record (quality). He's a better game 3 start than we have right now, even if it's not quite the upside of what else is out there. Or rumored to be anyway. He may not be my hands down target for this trade deadline, but if you ask me who I'd rather have, Mac Horvath/Bright or 2 1/2 years of Jameson Taillon I'm taking Jameson Taillon. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, interloper said:

Sure, absolutely. I am not attached to either of those prospects and Taillon is solid. I'd hope for some cash as well.

We could ask for some of their help with cash in exchange for higher prospects or lower ones if we pay the full price, depending how deal is made 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Allan Bryant said:

We could ask for some of their help with cash in exchange for higher prospects or lower ones if we pay the full price, depending how deal is made 

The rumor includes cash just not a disclosed amount. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, eddie83 said:

Not saying there is no chance they are dealing Bassitt but all indications are they are committed to trying to win next year. 

I agree that’s a hurdle, but in theory Bassitt is more replaceable than trading Vlad or Bichette, though. They could trade Bassitt and that opens up his $21M salary next year to sign a new free agent pitcher of about the same caliber (maybe even Kikuchi?), and they pocket the prospects they get in return for the half season they aren’t competitive. 

Jays could be an interesting fit for Urias, they’re planning on being competitive next year and their 3B/2B group is pretty weak.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bassitt at 1/21 for 2025 is probably a better deal than Toronto could get on the market if they run it one last time.

I noticed 2nd half we have all 7 of our games with them in a short burst near the trade deadline.

Manoah and Tiedemann both having disappointing seasons, so they need innings if they care about competing.

Kikuchi had a terrible game yesterday winding down the first half.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CaptainRedbeard said:

I agree that’s a hurdle, but in theory Bassitt is more replaceable than trading Vlad or Bichette, though. They could trade Bassitt and that opens up his $21M salary next year to sign a new free agent pitcher of about the same caliber (maybe even Kikuchi?), and they pocket the prospects they get in return for the half season they aren’t competitive. 

Jays could be an interesting fit for Urias, they’re planning on being competitive next year and their 3B/2B group is pretty weak.

It'd take a multi-year commitment though.    I think somewhere between Kyle Gibson and Chris Bassitt is that tipping point Elias cares about.

Cole Irvin might be a fit filling out behind Berrios/Gausman if they go as far as Bassitt but not as far as everyone.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

German Marquez made his return from early 2023 Tommy John the other day, but looking at his exact 2025 contract terms, he has a LOT of escalators.    It looks like if he hits them all he earns about 1/20 in 2025 similar to Chris Bassitt.

Clubs will probably gain a view of 2-3 more starts before deadline deciding time, but he probably offers greater upside than Cal Quantrill among Rockies pitchers.    Zoom in the microscope on that small sample.

2 years/$20M (2024-25)

signed extension with Colorado 9/8/23

24:$10M, 25:$10M

2025 roster bonuses: $2M each for 30, 60 days on active roster

2025 performance bonuses: $2M each for 140, 150, 160 innings

assignment bonus: $1M with trade, to be paid by acquiring club

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, CaptainRedbeard said:

I agree that’s a hurdle, but in theory Bassitt is more replaceable than trading Vlad or Bichette, though. They could trade Bassitt and that opens up his $21M salary next year to sign a new free agent pitcher of about the same caliber (maybe even Kikuchi?), and they pocket the prospects they get in return for the half season they aren’t competitive. 

Jays could be an interesting fit for Urias, they’re planning on being competitive next year and their 3B/2B group is pretty weak.

I agree. They can add via FA. 
 

I think Stowers makes sense for them.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Roll Tide said:

Would you do this deal?

The Cubs wouldn't. Why would they give Taillon away for a package led by a guy who wouldn't be in their top 20 prospects and eat half his contract for the right to do so? I'm not claiming Taillon should net a 50FV guy, but this makes no sense. His contract is reasonable for what he is, a low end 3 high end 4. They have no need to salary dump him because they have a lot of money coming off the books for 2025, which could be almost 70M if Bellinger opts out. They're planning to be competitive in 2025 so why dump him just so you then have to bring back in a new guy who is likely more expensive? If they're eating literally half his contract, they'll get a far more substantial return than this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Just Regular said:

Bassitt at 1/21 for 2025 is probably a better deal than Toronto could get on the market if they run it one last time.

I noticed 2nd half we have all 7 of our games with them in a short burst near the trade deadline.

Manoah and Tiedemann both having disappointing seasons, so they need innings if they care about competing.

Kikuchi had a terrible game yesterday winding down the first half.

He would be, so the Jays are going to have to view any deal in very favorable terms. They have the leverage with him. 
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I didn't but yes he complicates things further. 
    • I remember not liking the Jeffrey Hammonds for Willie Greene trade but Greene did have 3 partial .800+ OPS seasons before the trade happened. He did nothing with the O's however. The Glenn Davis trade was awful in retrospect, but at the time it happened I thought we we're getting a HOF type slugger. Didnt work out that way. Brady Anderson for Mike Boddicker trade was a solid win for the O's, though it took almost 4 years for Brady to become an impact player.
    • This line from Moneyball reminds me of the 2024 Orioles....    
    • Playoffs are slipping away?  lol yeah with Red Sox going 2-5 in last 7 they will probably pass us any minute.  We are going to the playoffs I don’t know why you keep thinking they won’t make it or have no chance.    They also are not gonna use up an option for Young for one spot start.  
    • I rarely post as I prefer to read the wonderful banter on this board   I especially love the intelligent, thoughtful posts from Frobby, as well as the passionate and dramatic statements from Roy Firestone.  However, I dread the reactionary threads and constant finger-pointing when things go wrong. Case in point, I was watching ESPN game tracker last night and reading the thread and felt the Orioles were being robbed by a terrible umpire,which ruined my mood and life in general (yes, I can be like Roy).  However, when I checked the scorecard, here is what I found: 100% accuracy on called balls.  88% on called strikes.   I am not well versed on these statistics so wanted some guidance on what constitutes a good score.  I’ll be rooting for the Orioles tonight to bounce back whether the umpire agrees or not. 🙏   Here is a sample of the comments directly from the thread:   Sports guy “Story of tonight was the umpiring.  It was an absolute disgrace and definitely led to some bad at bats that maybe wouldn’t have been so bad with an umpiring that had the gift of sight.” ”Embarrassing umpiring. Both teams should rip the hell out of this guy in the post game pressers.” Os84 ”That umpire should be arrested for crimes against Baseball.” dzorange ”I can’t wait to see this ump’s scorecard” Emory Eagle ”Kind of ridiculous how one sided this strike zone. ” Moreisbetter27 ”This umpire is terrible. Alot of the time when a catcher pulls a pitch so exaggeratedly like Francisco is doing, it works against the pitcher because the umpire is noticing how ridiculously the catcher is moving. This guy is eating it up. ”
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...