Jump to content

Early Thoughts on the 2023 Draft Class - Hitters


sportsfan8703

Recommended Posts

Rd    Pick   Name                               Pos    School                                Stats
1       17     Enrique Bradfield Jr.        CF      Vanderbilt University          Stats
2       53     Mac Horvath                   OF      North Carolina U               Stats 
3B   100    
Tavian Josenberger         OF      Arkansas University             Stats 
5     154    Jake Cunningham           OF      UNC Charlotte (NC)            Stats
10   301   Matthew Etzel                 OF      Southern Mississippi           Stats
16   481   Cole Urman                    C         Cal State Fullerton              Stats 
20   601  Jalen Vasquez                SS         North Greenville U (SC)     Stats 

 

Bonuses              
                 
Rd Pk                                       Slot                 Bonus                Savings    
1. 17   Enrique Bradfield Jr.     $4,170,000      4,170,000               0    
2 53   Mac Horvath       $1,580,000      1,400,000          $180,000    
             
3B. 100 Tavian Josenberger     $671,800          630,000             $41,800    
             
5. 154 Jake Cunningham      $396,700          375,000             $21,700    
             
10. 301 Matthew Etzel    

$167,000          167,000                    0 

Edited by sportsfan8703
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Etzel is carrying the class in terms of early production. He’s already in AA Bowie. He’s not a little guy either for a CF, which you would think with him being a 10th rd pick. He’s 6’2” 200. 

EBJ I feel like is going to frustrate us because he might be the Jorge Mateo of CF.  Casual fans don’t like that, but our lineup is poised to carry a GG level CF with elite base stealing/base running. 

I’ll lump Josenberger and Vasquez together at the moment. Both are guys with 30+ SB, but in that .670 OPS range in A+ Aberdeen. Again, just like EBJ, can they get that OPS up enough to be playable offensively. I do not know about their defense. Can Josenberger play CF  in pro ball?  How does Vasquez look at SS?

Urman and Cunningham are struggling.

Horvath hit just .199 in April and May.  He got off to a slow start and hit the IL for a bit. He’s really come on recently.  
 

Thoughts?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bradfield -  C- .  Needs a big second half.

Horvath - C.  Needs a good second half.

Baumeister - C.  Walks are a big problem.

Josenberger - C+.  For the 3rd round at least he’s interesting.
 

Levi Wells - D.  Showed glimpses but getting knocked around way too much.

Matthew Etzel - A.  Couldn’t ask for much better from a 10th round pick.

Good news -  He looks like the best player from this draft

Bad news - He looks like the best player from this draft.

The O’s went for speed and athletes so there’s still a chance some of these guys figure it out.  So far, not so good.

 

Interesting arms.

Nestor German

Teddy Sharkey (TJ surgery)

Kiefer Lord (TJ surgery)

Edited by RZNJ
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was very excited by Cunningham given the tools but he’s looking like a non-prospect, he is the biggest disappointment for me.

EBJ may not shoot through the minors like our recent high college hitter picks but it hasn’t been all bad. Exactly 100 wRC+ as a 22 year old speed/defense CF in A+ ball. It’s more of the same from his short debut last year with good K/BB rates, and the power hasn’t been terrible relative to expectations, hovering around .100 ISO all year. He just has a much lower BABIP than you would expect for a super fast guy in the low minors, and that’s not a great sign for his line drive contact quality but not a big red flag quite yet.

Especially with Cowser showing so well defensively there is no reason to rush EBJ. But I wouldn’t be surprised to see him in a trade since he likely still has good trade value and is definitely one of the highest profile position players in the second tier of the system where they’re most likely to deal from. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RZNJ said:

Bradfield -  C- .  Needs a big second half.

Horvath - C.  Needs a good second half.

Baumeister - C.  Walks are a big problem.

Josenberger - C+.  For the 3rd round at least he’s interesting.
 

Levi Wells - D.  Showed glimpses but getting knocked around way too much.

Matthew Etzel - A.  Couldn’t ask for much better from a 10th round pick.

Good news -  He looks like the best player from this draft

Bad news - He looks like the best player from this draft.

The O’s went for speed and athletes so there’s still a chance some of these guys figure it out.  So far, not so good.

 

Interesting arms.

Nestor German

Teddy Sharkey (TJ surgery)

Kiefer Lord (TJ surgery)

Thanks for the info on Sharkey and Lord. Also, you brought this up in the draft discussion, but our 16th rd OF Qrey Lott from 2023 could still be signed. I would think in a “weaker” draft as this year is viewed, and a draft that we traded a pick for Burnes, that we would want to sign him. 

Edited by sportsfan8703
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Thanks for the info on Sharkey and Lord. Also, you brought this up in the draft discussion, but our 16th rd OF Qrey Lott from 2023 could still be signed. I would think in a “weaker” draft as this year is viewed, and a draft that we traded a pick for Burnes, that we would want to sign him. 

We would want to sign him if we still think he’s good.   They had a season to watch him at junior college.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’ve been happy with Horvath’s recent surge.  1.009 OPS in June.  He needs to back that up with another good month, but at least we know he’s capable of having one.  I keep waiting for Bradfield to really go on a tear, but it feels like every time he has 3-4 cf consecutive good days, he cools right back down.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Posts

    • I agree, except for the 'gotta find a taker for Urias'.  We should NOT refuse to improve the team just because we can't unload Urias on someone.  Sure, I'd MUCH rather trade him and get some value for him.  But if no one wants him or isn't willing to give us anything for him, I'm not keeping Mayo in the minors just because I'm not willing to cut Urias.  Trade him IF we can, cut him if we must.  But let's get Mayo's bat in the lineup.  
    • I am not sure why the Orioles would make a trade for Luzardo in the next few weeks.  Luzardo has too many question marks regarding his ability to help the Orioles this year.   Any prospects dealt in the next few weeks should for players who can get the Orioles win the World Series this year.  If they strengthen the Orioles for 2025 and beyond, great.   If the Marlins will give up Luzardo for pennies on the dollar, then go get him.  
    • I think I may. When I originally made this post, I honestly didn’t realize he wasn’t going to be back until mid to late August. That really hurts the time frame for him to get his value up for the offseason. I mean, it could get higher imo, I’m not doubting that. But if it was at peak in the offseason and he’s 70 cents on the dollar now, how much will it go up after making 6-8 more starts? 80 cents on the dollar?  Does that increase warrant keeping him and risking that it doesn’t drop more? I don’t think the deal I offered is a slap in the face offer but I do think it’s an offer that has good but not great upside. How much you believe in Stowers and Norby obviously matters here. However, it gives them good depth, immediate ML help and several years of control.    But I could definitely see Miami wanting a better headliner and less quantity..I’m just doubtful they can get that unless they hold onto him for another year and hope he stays healthy and performs well. If he does, he can make back that trade value at that time. But, as we saw with cease, sometimes the risk just isn’t worth it and you have to take the best deal you can.  
    • We know the real answer.  Let’s see if we get it.  Lol
    • Those guys would cost who else, whos the headliner
    • Right.  SG wants to get a bargain.  Even if Luzardo’s arm falls off after the trade, he didn’t give up one player it hurts to part with.      No reason for the Marlins to sell low unless they think Luzardo never bounces back close to the 2023 level.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...