Jump to content

Possible First Steps to Moving the A's out of Oakland?


Recommended Posts

Yahoo Sports.com

To date they, like the two ownership groups in Oakland before them, have been unsuccessful in those efforts, despite having the significant support of their corporate partner Cisco. The time has come for a thorough analysis of why a stadium deal has not been reached. The A’s cannot and will not continue indefinitely in their current situation.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • I didn't say anything about it stopping us from doing anything.  Just saying that's way more than he's worth, and therefore even if we can afford it, and it doesn't hurt us, I'm still not ok with signing him for that amount.  Just because we have the room and can afford it, that doesn't justify vastly overpaying for a 1st basemen on the wrong side of 34.  
    • How many games did he play after the sanctions?  8 years worth . Was he tested?  So you are either saying the testing is totally inept or that he was using substances that escaped detection.  And you think he was not subject to particular scrutiny due to prior offenses?  Yet he played 8 years with ZERO violations which would have cost him an entire season.    So if you think it was steroids that had him playing a huge role in us winning the AL East then show me where you wanted him not signed or suspended during 2014 back then.  And again you say all GMs knew this yet Oriole GM, Seattle GM, Twins GM etc all signed him?  Are they just stupid?  https://www.twinkietown.com/platform/amp/2021/7/1/22557471/mlb-minnesota-twins-dh-steroids-should-not-be-synonymous-with-nelson-cruz
    • In my opinion, Mountcastle played himself out of the right for us to be not making moves due to him being on the roster. If we can sign a quality 1st baseman for a reasonable price, do it and figure out what to do with Mountcastle later.  
    • It’s 5M. That’s nothing. It doesn’t stop you from doing anything.  
    • You aren't wrong about the payroll, but even with the room I don't want to see us stupidly overpaying for players just because we can afford to do so.   I was ok with Abreu at 18 per or so.  But 20 per is too much, and your 23.3M a year is just way too much in my opinion for him.  
    • And if they are really thinking Ardoin is their long term back up might as well give Mav his shot and see what he has.  
    • I'd be over the moon with Verlander and Bassitt, they are probably my top 2 choices for the rotation due to the relative brevity of the commitments they'll require despite being among the best FA SPs available. Justin Turner on a 1 year deal would be fine with me if he's mostly DHing, which I assume is their idea. Gonna have to pass on Trea, really don't see his contract aging well. Would definitely improve us for a few years though. No strong feelings one way or the other on Martin, bullpen is a lot lower on my list of priorities presently. But if the deal is reasonable, sure. Sadly though, Justin Turner is the only one I can buy into the Orioles being legitimate players for here in the real world.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Create New...