Jump to content

Kevin Millwood Possible Trade Updates...


jdouble777

Recommended Posts

Wouldn't shock me to see us throw in Steve Johnson, who they didn't protect on the 40 man....If you can get Millwood for Ray and SJ and have them eat 2-4 million of the contract, that's a good deal for us.

To give up 2 guys that very easily won't be on the opening day roster I'd eat the whole $12m. It's only for one year, and more than likely they want him to "mentor" and eat space in the rotation to buy the young guys some time, then trade him at the deadline.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 91
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I would like that trade better. Some of the questionable (frustrating arms) will need to go. If the O's are looking for BP guys like Soriano, someone has to go. Ray hasn't looked all that good in a few years now. Yes, I know he was injured, but what says he comes back the same player?

If we have Millwood/Soriano and 10 mill added to payroll, over Scott/Ray I'd say it's a win for the O's. Yeah, I made a few assumptions :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I find it humorous that talks started out with Tillman, then Hernandez/Erbe, and now its down to Ray. And they are still going to get Texas to pay part of his salary. Oh AP you are a bold one.

I think Roch said it best in an entry the other day...gone are the days where you fact check and get the real story before you post your name to something. In this day of twitter, and blogs they race to throw the first rumor they hear out there and hope it's their name next to the one that ends up being right in the end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd like the deal a lot less if we include Johnson. If you assume he's gonna be taken in the Rule V then it doesn't matter, but two wrongs don't make a right. Not protecting Johnson was a poor move, IMO, and dealing him for Millwood would also be a weak move.

SJ may have a future in the pen but he's a dime a dozen arm...If you trade him, its not a loss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To give up 2 guys that very easily won't be on the opening day roster I'd eat the whole $12m. It's only for one year, and more than likely they want him to "mentor" and eat space in the rotation to buy the young guys some time, then trade him at the deadline.

I don't understand this? We are positive that Ray will not be on the ML roster? Well Bell probably won't be on the OD roster either does that make him expendable? Obviously I know thats not what you mean but just because someone isn't going to be on the OD roster doesn't mean they are garbage throw ins. Like Mackus said, the deal gets considerably worse if it is Ray and Johnson.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I find it humorous that talks started out with Tillman, then Hernandez/Erbe, and now its down to Ray. And they are still going to get Texas to pay part of his salary. Oh AP you are a bold one.

I think that was all coming out of the Texas side. I don't think we ever offered the names that were talked about . Don't forget Pie also .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a good question though - if this does go through, do we still persue Bedard? Our rotation seems set with Guts, BB, Matusz, and Tillman. No place for 2 additional starters.

I don't think this move has anything to do with us pursuing Bedard.

You can never have enough pitching.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Damn I wish I was that guy
    • Crochet had a monstrous game tonight. 7 IP 2 H 1 ER 2 BB 13 Ks I would love to have him even if it meant moving him to the bullpen for the final stretch but someone is gonna drastically overpay for him with top of rotation potential and 2x additional seasons of club control.    assuming it starts with Mayo, Kjerstad, Povich etc 
    • I would like to see the O's have more success drafting and developing their own pitchers under Elias.  But I must concede that so far Elias has an excellent track record of getting good young controllable pitching from other teams farm systems  (Bradish, Povich, McDermott, Cano) or the waiver wire (Suarez, Webb, Perez).   The development of these pitchers suggests that we have excellent coaching in the high minors and in the majors.  There's more than one way to skin a cat. At this point I don't see a need to trade farm system capital for a top-line starting pitcher like Luzardo.  If the season ended today I'd feel really good about going into a playoff series with Burnes, Rodriguez and Bradish as our big three starters.   I also see no point in getting Crochet midseason as he's not going to be able to carry a starters' load into October.  It's more likely that we trade for bullpen help now, and then address starting pitching in the offseason if Burnes moves on.   
    • I would rather trade for Kikuchi than Luzardo. His FB has gotten hammered pretty much every year besides 2022 and he gets very few whiffs on it. His slider and changeup are both really good but he throws them less than 50% of the time combined. He could probably improve just by throwing those pitches more but not sure how successful he can truly be with that FB.
    • They made a conscious choice to not draft pitching, instead to let other teams, draft, pitching, and deal with the failures. I see their logic and I don’t disagree with it, but the flipside is that when you need pitching, you have to pay the going rate. And that’s something that Mike doesn’t seem to want to do.  And that’s a wee bit o’ trouble, it tis…
    • Let’s overpay a bit for Crotchett. No reason not to buy the best
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...