Jump to content

Source: Orioles Close To Signing Kevin Gregg To Two Year Deal


Brendan25

Recommended Posts

Want proof Gregg is a good signing?

BOOM:

Career ERA+: 109

Number of consecutive years w/23 or more saves: 4

SO/BB Rate in last two odd seasons (07, 09): 2.18 and 2.37, respectively

Number of HR allowed in 2010 as compared to 2009: -9

THAT'S HOW YOU DROP DATA, SON!

You didn't give that sentence nearly the amount of exclamation points it deserves. That was a four exclamation point sentence, minimum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 300
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I completely agree. Will Ohman was one of them. Noone expected him to be as dominant as he was to start the year last year. But there are also scrap players that get picked up and play like Garrett Atkins.

Is Gregg as good as Rafael Soriano? No, but he is CONSISTANTLY a reliever that has an ERA around 3.50 - 4.00. I'll pay for that.

Fine..But instead of 12 million, you could have paid 2 million.

This is just dumb. To overpay 10 million for a 3.8 ERA reliever is idiotic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Hayden2004

danconnollysun Dan Connolly

#Orioles have not made a $12 million offer to Kevin Gregg. Club doesn't feel any deal is imminent. 2 year offer bw 8-10M still on table

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Connolly via twitter:

@danconnollysun

Dan Connolly

#Orioles have not made a $12 million offer to Kevin Gregg. Club doesn't feel any deal is imminent. 2 year offer bw 8-10M still on table

Look, if you're going to go ahead and waste $4-5M a year on a meh reliever, you might as well just go ahead and waste the extra $1-2M a year on him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not very high. Rivera has been over 2.6 WAR only three times in his career. IMO, WAR doesn't do a good job in accounting for their value, but I don't really have much to back it up except pointing you to Rivera's worth.

Hmm...this is actually really interesting. Out of the 163 relief pitchers who threw 40 innings or more last year, 49 of them finished with a WAR of 1.0 or better. According to the measure, Mr. Gregg was precisely as valuable as Jason Berken :P

You're probably right...doesn't seem to be a great standard.

Regardless, good to hear the contract report is probably false/overblown.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay, I don't 100% agree. Every year, many of the best relievers are signed off the scrap heap, but this is more an artifact of reliever seasons being small sample sizes by definition than because reliever true talent is specifically more valuable than starter true talent. If you want consistent production, you have to pay for quality, if you can identify it. If you roll the dice on cheap acquisitions, sometimes you get what you need and sometimes you get a guy who's cut in Spring Training.

Then why are we signing Gregg? :wedge:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Connolly via twitter:

@danconnollysun

Dan Connolly

#Orioles have not made a $12 million offer to Kevin Gregg. Club doesn't feel any deal is imminent. 2 year offer bw 8-10M still on table

Whether it is 8 million, 10 million or 12 million, its still a stupid contract..Its just different degrees of stupidity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think our offer is still out there. . Probably since Boston is one of the main suitors,you send out a rumor and try to get them to up their bid.

I bet there's some truth to this. Maybe MacPhail's offer (2 years/8-10 million) is on the table because it's not so wildly expensive that if he accepted, we'd be in a tough spot, but it's also high enough to make Boston's bullpen reconstruction more difficult and expensive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Fangraphs credits him with 2.1 fWAR at 3B and 1.7 at SS, so that’s 3.8 so far (it’s possible they might have him dabbling at DH once in a while, we’ll see).  At SS, the O’s ranked 18th at 3.4 fWAR, with Mateo and Henderson splitting time roughly 60/40.  Fangraphs comments: “This playing time projection is the numerical equivalent of throwing your hands up in the air. Henderson looks bound for stardom, be it at third or shortstop, but Mateo is still holding on to the position for now after a solid defensive year established him as the everyday starter. His offensive numbers are downright ugly – that .284 projected wOBA is the second-lowest for anyone in this article with 100 or more PAs – but you can get away with that kind of bat at shortstop if your glove is transcendent. “In 2022, Mateo’s was, but he’d never flashed that level of defense before, so Orioles talent evaluators will have their work cut out for them early in the year. Henderson will likely start the season at third base, but if Mateo’s defense looks shaky, the team should make the switch sooner rather than later. Those offensive numbers next to Henderson’s name are no joke — think Corey Seager, if you’re looking for a parallel as an offense-first lefty shortstop. 2023 is just the start of Baltimore’s plan for contention, but what they do at shortstop will have ramifications for both this year and the future.” https://blogs.fangraphs.com/2023-positional-power-rankings-shortstop/  
    • What I've been seeing overall is that a lot of fans were more engaged with the WBC than with their regular team this spring. Just yesterday I was talking to someone who had gone to the games in Miami and were raving about the experience.
    • I hadn’t really started the WBC poll with this in mind, but so far it appears that many more OH members tuned into the WBC than have tuned in to O’s spring training games.   Considering the composition of the audience, and the frequent complaints about the paucity of O’s spring training broadcasts, that’s not necessarily the outcome I would have expected.  
    • It's only Spring Training, but....... I'm getting pretty amped up for some baseball. 
    • Either I’m going crazy or there was a glitch on baseball reference that day. No wonder I thought was amazing!
    • But Urias’ knee is was an issue. Hope it isn’t an issue in season.    We have a good “problem” on our hands. I don’t think it’s prudent to bring Westburg up unless he’s playing 4+ days a week.    I can see Elias’ thinking with Frazier. We needed an insurance policy if Urias wasn’t good to go, or God forbid that that Mullins gets hurt and Frazier could lead off.  It’s looking like we should trade Mateo, but there is little market, then play Gunnar at SS, with Westburg as basically a starting 3rd/4th IF. We need a Mateo buyer. 
    • No, it’s amortizing. Once the 7 years is up, if we have not re-fi’ed, our rate goes to what it is at that time.    I tend to doubt we will see interest rates get below the 4.375 was have but if we can get back to 5 or lower at any point, I will probably re-if early even if it means a little higher rate than we have now in the short term to insure we are ok long term.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...