Jump to content

Brian Roberts Stiffness in Neck


mdevito

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 106
  • Created
  • Last Reply
That's cervical, not cervix. Cervical pertains to the neck. Thoracic is mid-back. Lumbar is lower back.

I know (although cervical also means pertaining to the cervix); my mom the nurse left her medical books out for me at an early age, so I became quite versed in anatomy. Just having a bit of fun in a situation of no real consequence; one has to admit Roberts is in a class by himself these days as far as getting everyone in a tizzy over possible maladies.... He's not invincible, but he isn't yet made of glass, either.

So yes, two meanings in both parts of the original statement.... :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll say this much. Buck is known as a very thorough manager. He of course anticipated Brian missing time. I don't think he (or anyone here...) thinks he plans on sticking Izzy in the leadoff spot. He must have some alignment that he thinks is adequate.

Also, this is not the tragedy that it was last year (in the worst case for Brian...) Last year he was one of only a couple pillars for this team. This year he's just one of the good pieces.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Better now than March 23rd...but I'm still barely holding back from reacting as though the sky's falling. X-rays are not happy occurrences.

That doesn't bother me in the least. I think they're just being absolutely careful. If Brian sneezed he would get an x-ray and an MRI.

Divorce that completely from whether or not this is serious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That doesn't bother me in the least. I think they're just being absolutely careful. If Brian sneezed he would get an x-ray and an MRI.

Divorce that completely from whether or not this is serious.

No, I know...the context of pro sports is completely different from the one in which an average person reacts to an average injury.

Still, Roberts treating a stiff neck as "normal" for the average person sort of crosses lines in odd ways (i.e. given the above...pro athlete, etc.). What'd make me feel more comfortable is knowing how often this kind of thing happens to him specifically, what his usual reaction is, how long it generally takes to go away, etc. If stiff necks aren't a common occurrence for Roberts, and he's been struck with one now (at the beginning of ST and in the wake of a back injury-plagued season), I think there're plenty of reasons to worry.

Not trying to overreact though :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Asked if the X-ray was just precautionary, Roberts smiled and replied, "Yeah, they are always precautionary. So yeah, they just sent me to get one."
A"I understand there's about a two feet difference from where my back hurt and where my neck hurt," Roberts said, "so I'm pretty sure they are not related."

http://www.masnsports.com/school_of_roch/2011/02/roberts-downplays-neck-issue.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To early to PANIC! Let's wait for a full report.

But' date=' it is a bad way to start off ST. :([/quote']

Although you're not the only one to exaggerate the responses here, you did feel the need to shout about it, Therefore, I must ask who was "panicking?" because that wasn't my perception at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • From here https://www.mlb.com/orioles/stats/ops/regular-season
    • Where are you getting your stats from that's not correct looking at OPS.
    • On the O's this year, Martinez would have been: 5th in OPS 5th in AVG 6th in HRs in 120 games
    • I think PFF is grading Roquan badly because the safeties behind him are playing like ass and it's making him look bad.  If teams are going to attack him over the middle on crossing routes with WRs (like KC did with Rice) he doesn't really stand much of a chance if the safeties behind him don't throw him a bone.  He's still a huge help in the run game.   In general I think PFF assigns a little too much blame to linebackers on passes over the middle, so unless you're an elite coverage guy at LB it's really hard to grade well.  The flip side to this is that teams probably need to adjust their coverage areas to account for the fact that LBs aren't going to be able to hold down WRs for long.  
    • Thanks. This tells me what my eyes have seen with Roquan. He's been a liability in coverage and the fact that Simpson is ahead of him is not good for our defensive leader. Do you have the PFF grades for offense too?
    • What you want is perfectly reasonable.  But you seem entirely to focused on money.  The team needs to work to improve.  I don't care what it costs, you shouldn't either.  They are going to spend money and payroll will be higher next year and the year after that.  We need them to make improvements and some of that is rightfully going to come from within and not cost much. The improvements that are needed are going to cost too, I'm not saying they wont.  But ownership and the GM should simply work in tandem to make sure the team has what it needs.  I am not really concerned about how much that costs because it should be able to be done without jumping this particular team into say top ten in payroll.
    • This is the right approach. the orioles should be spending more money and I believe they will, but I expect it to be measured with less risk (ie we won’t be handing out a Hader type deal or a  long term contract to Santander IMO) improving on some of the obvious weaknesses certainly makes sense.    1x SP: Burnes, Fried, Buehler 1x RH OF/DH: Martinez, O’Neill, Profar 1x 1B: (wishlist) Alonso, Walker
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...