Jump to content

Game of Shadows


Todd-O

Recommended Posts

I've never read the book... but Dan Patrick said (on his show today) that the book reported that Bond's shoe size grew from 10.5 to 13 (which indicates HGH)

Has anyone read G of S?

Conversely, I've read that a side effect of 'roids is "shrinkage". If all this is true, I guess this would be one instance where the old saying about foot size doesn't work. :eek:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've never read the book... but Dan Patrick said (on his show today) that the book reported that Bond's shoe size grew from 10.5 to 13 (which indicates HGH)

Has anyone read G of S?

Conversely, I've read that a side effect of 'roids is "shrinkage". If all this is true, I guess this would be one instance where the old saying about foot size doesn't work. :eek:

I haven't read it, but I had roomates at Towson who were taking 'roids and HGH. The "shrinkage" you refer to would be to the berries and not the twig, if I may be allowed to use such an expession (if not, I beg for mercy from the moderators). It's the HGH that would make your feet grow, your head, etc. And I'd like to add that this is what my roommates told me, not what I saw or experienced!

Incidentally, of my 3 roomates who were all very much into weightlifting and training, one took HGH and steroids, one just took steroids, and one only took legal, over the counter supplements. The "all natural" guy looked the smallest but was the strongest -- anecdotal evidence to be sure, and indicative of nothing, probably. The HGH / steroids roomate puffed up real quickly.

And me? I was too busy playing NHL Hockey on my Sega and, uh, 'experimenting' with other illicit substances to bother going to the gym, much less spend money on drugs that didn't make me appreciate 'Drums / Space' from RFK '72! Ah well, live and learn...and then probably forget...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've never read the book... but Dan Patrick said (on his show today) that the book reported that Bond's shoe size grew from 10.5 to 13 (which indicates HGH)

Has anyone read G of S?

Conversely, I've read that a side effect of 'roids is "shrinkage". If all this is true, I guess this would be one instance where the old saying about foot size doesn't work. :eek:

They accused of bonds feet growing from size 9-12 which is very odd since I dont think a 6'2 person would wear such small shoes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • I wonder how people would feel if Eflin’s ERA this season started with a 3 - like every single more predictive measure (3.37 xERA, 3.65 FIP, 3.77 xFIP, 3.92 SIERA) - instead of being a ghastly 4.09.  For those hoping for somebody better - who exactly do you think is better who is potentially available other than Skubal and Crochet? Fedde has been better this year, but last year he was in Korea and Eflin had a 4.7 fWAR season with a 3.50 ERA. I’d still take Eflin over him going forward, even if it’s close. More importantly, he’s also owed only $7.5M next year to Eflin’s $18M, so the trade price will be MUCH higher and every single team looking for pitching can afford him next year and is competing for him. Taking Eflin’s salary lowered the competition and the prospect capital and is EXACTLY the type of deal the Orioles should be doing with their payroll flexibility. Snell was horrible this year, then hurt, and now maybe himself again. Even if you think he’s good going forward now, he’s a rental with the anchor of a potential $31M salary next year if he gets injured or starts struggling again.  Bassitt is good, but by all predictive measures other than ERA still worse than Eflin this year, but he’s 35 and owed even more next year ($21M). And the reports are he’s not even available.  Taillon is fine, but not better than Eflin - everything in his profile is pointing to a 4+ ERA much more than Eflin. Rangers are not trading Eovaldi or Scherzer now. Luzardo maybe, but he’s hurt and MIA may not be trading him either.  Am I missing anybody? I’d love to add any of these guys too and don’t think the Orioles should stop here. But Eflin was arguably the best available, and definitely the best fit in terms of the balance of prospect capital vs. taking on salary. To boot they also added added to a rotation next year that right now only has Grayson and Kremer.  I can understand wanting a more impressive high K, ace SP type in theory, but with all of this context I don’t know how you could think anything other than loving this deal. 
    • Which indicates that this is currently not a good team.  Question marks everywhere. If your not playing and not happy about it, make the most of the chances when you get them.
    • i agree with what those who are saying the vets might be a little miffed with uncertain contract futures looming.  But the reality is the young guys are going to be auditioned adequately before summarily being brought up just to take their "rightful" places now filled by vets. I don't have any problem with how Elias is handling talent either in the farm or on the MLB team.  And after reflecting a while on a position I had about trading long-term O's during a Playoff/WS run - basically, that Elias would show some deference to guys that got us here - I've flopped on that.  What I think is happening is that the audition process is concluding in some ways.  Had Hays come out like an All-Star again this year, I still think he would have/ could have been traded, but for maybe a higher net.  Cowser and Kierstadt have, by now, proven themselves - so to speak, and having control of them, makes them more valuable, particularly since both were outperforming Hays.  I think Mullins could be next.  To me, it was basically a "prove it" year for anyone competing for OF positions.  My biggest question is do they amp up the "try outs" for 2nd and 3rd base now.
    • What I was saying yesterday is without Burnes, he moved into that spot at the top of the rotation for the team as currently constructed. I’m not saying next year he will be a CY candidate, although he has great stuff and has the potential to do so if he can put it all together. 
    • Actually it's clear to me that there is no reporting. No quotes or even "sources say".
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...