Jump to content

Mark Reynolds Appreciation Thread


ChaosLex

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 82
  • Created
  • Last Reply
It is too early for this thread, I hope. But if Mark Reynolds hits 40+ HR's for the Red Sox this year, I will never forgive our front office.
What if he hits them for the Rays?

What if he hits 40 homers for the Sox but our offense is better than last year's and we win the division?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What if he hits 40 homers for the Sox but our offense is better than last year's and we win the division?

First off I was messing with him with the Rays comment. I am holding judgment on the Reynolds situation until the dominoes stop falling.

Secondly the overall offense could be better and yet the production from Reynold's replacement still be worse then what he would have given them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What if he hits 40 homers for the Sox but our offense is better than last year's and we win the division?

OK, but it's hard to see how Reynolds hitting 40 homers for *us* would not be a key factor in the O's winning the division. And if he were to hit them for Boston it certainly would make the O's drive to the pennant a lot harder. Reynolds' type of home runs have a perfect arc for the Green Monster, sort of like Rico Petrocelli's (Do I live in the distant past or what?). Don't want to face that during late innings in Fenway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First off I was messing with him with the Rays comment. I am holding judgment on the Reynolds situation until the dominoes stop falling.

Secondly the overall offense could be better and yet the production from Reynold's replacement still be worse then what he would have given them.

I figured you were messing with him, and so was I, in part. But Duquette's job is to get the best production out of his payroll that he can, and produce a winner. If he spends less at 1B and production is down there, but he spends more in LF and production is up there, and we are better overall and we win, is it going to bother me that we weren't as productive at 1B and that Reynolds had a good year for another team? Nope.

That said, all the poor-mouthing that Duquette has been doing concerns me. Are we really as strapped as his various remarks suggest? I hope not. I really don't see any reason why the Orioles shouldn't be able to increase their payroll after having a 20% attendance increase and earning a nice bit of playoff revenue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I figured you were messing with him, and so was I, in part. But Duquette's job is to get the best production out of his payroll that he can, and produce a winner. If he spends less at 1B and production is down there, but he spends more in LF and production is up there, and we are better overall and we win, is it going to bother me that we weren't as productive at 1B and that Reynolds had a good year for another team? Nope.

That said, all the poor-mouthing that Duquette has been doing concerns me. Are we really as strapped as his various remarks suggest? I hope not. I really don't see any reason why the Orioles shouldn't be able to increase their payroll after having a 20% attendance increase and earning a nice bit of playoff revenue.

I assume the information that you have been delving into with the National's arbitration of revenues is part of the stand pat. I am very sad if we can't raise the finance bar now that we have raised the on field one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That said, all the poor-mouthing that Duquette has been doing concerns me. Are we really as strapped as his various remarks suggest? I hope not. I really don't see any reason why the Orioles shouldn't be able to increase their payroll after having a 20% attendance increase and earning a nice bit of playoff revenue.

Whatever good will from the fan base that rubbed off on PA due to the success of last season will disappear if they go into next season with the same payroll they had this season.

Then again I am surprised they have not announced an increase in ticket prices yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That said, all the poor-mouthing that Duquette has been doing concerns me. Are we really as strapped as his various remarks suggest? I hope not. I really don't see any reason why the Orioles shouldn't be able to increase their payroll after having a 20% attendance increase and earning a nice bit of playoff revenue.

seriouspete.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • If you're projecting a future lineup without Mullins in 2026, then EBJ is a reasonable placeholder name to put in there. I would assume most people understand that it's not a sure thing to work out that way. 
    • Every year players are injured sliding head first into bags or even worse home plate. Just noticed that EBJ has a head injury from sliding head first into home (really dangerous and stupid) I'll say it again, what analytics driven organization will be the first to ban head first slides for all of their players I remember when David Sequi was a decent player and ended his career with a serious hand injury sliding head/hand first into home. Cal never slid head first, and wouldn't have been the iron man if he did.
    • Oh, I don't know. I thought when accusing someone of wild malpractice over possibly, maybe, slightly speeding up highlights that kind of opened the door to a little goofy exaggeration.
    • I was going to post something about this after reading about that on MLBTR this morning. That gives me a lot of hope for Bradish if this kid can come back from a UCL sprain and throw 103. Obviously, reliever vs. starter so who knows. But uplifting to read nonetheless. 
    • Hollocher hit almost exclusively 2nd in the order. The Cubs' 3rd hitters (and it was the Cubs, not the Indians as I previously stated) were mostly Marty Krug, Zeb Terry, and John Kelleher. Krug was awful for a 1922 3rd-place hitter, with an 83 OPS+ in his only season as a MLB regular, but he only struck out 43 times in 524 PAs. Terry was worse, OPS+ing 74, but with just 16 Ks in 571 PAs. And Kelleher was the worst of the bunch, OPS+ing 60, while striking out 14 times in 222 PAs. Cubs manager Reindeer Bill Killefer stuck hard and fast to the old rule of thumb that the catcher should bat 8th, even if it's Bob O'Farrell and he hit .324 with an .880 OPS. Ray Grimes had a 1.014 OPS and batted cleanup. But Hack Miller and his .899 OPS batted mostly 6th. Statz wasn't a terrible leadoff hitter, was one of only a couple players who had a SB% higher than 50%, but was 6th among their regulars in OBP. That's as bad a bunch of #3 hitters as I've seen in a while, yet the Cubs finished 80-74-2. Just goes to show you batting order doesn't really matter. Anyway, back to the main point... yes, I'm sure some of Hollocher's CS were busted hit-and-runs. But nobody that regularly batted behind him struck out in even 7% of PAs so they shoulda been putting the ball in play the vast majority of the time.    
    • Bobby needs to git gud. 
    • How many people actually said they were one of the greatest teams ever?   They did hit the snot out of the ball the first 9 games of the year, mostly in a 6 game series in a very hitter-friendly ball park against a bad pitching staff.  That said, they’re still second in the league in runs per game.  Their pitching has been problematic, yielding 6.50 runs per game.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...