Jump to content

Lot of interest in Orioles young pitching. Has picked up last two days


Greg

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 67
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Since when is Steve Pearce a "capable" 1B? You mean the same guy we let go mid season last year? That's just great..

I don't want to see Steve Pearce in the lineup on a regular basis, but if everything else unfortunately plays out so it ends up that way, it's not the end of the world. I know only a few people on here are willing to hear it, but a Betemit-Pearce platoon, is capable of putting up an .780 to .800 OPS with Betemit starting against righties and Pearce against lefties. All for about 2.5 million dollars too. Though obviously neither should be playing the field unless it's an emergency so they'd have to be penciled in at DH.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why does everybody assume people are interested in just Tillman, BMat, Jake, and ZB? It could be teams are interested in Chen, MG, and Hammel. I don't think DD wants to move any of the last three, or maybe in the right situation he would. The last three are relatively young.

I understand peoples frustrations, but let's at least see how the rest of the meetings and off season pans out. I think this team needs some work to improve upon last year, but there is still time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't understand why anyone would get upset by what Duquette is saying. Hell...I barely listen to what comes out of his mouth. He'll do something, and when he does, that's when he should be judged. Until then, you're just getting mad because he's talking like a GM.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And having the best scouting and development team in the business. The Orioles had a 14 year-long chance to match that and they failed somewhat miserably. That's neither here nor there, though. Signing a bunch of randoms without any significant trades or free agent signings (not just top shelf guys, even above average players like a Swisher) is not under any circumstances sustainable if you're trying to build a perennial contender. Even the small market Rays (actual small market, not pretend small market like we are) mixed in a few of those.

And dating back to 2000, the A's, Rays, and Twins have a combined 0 World Series wins and 1 World Series appearance, so clearly that approach did not/does not work.

So what's your point? Like it or not he Os are working within a limited budget. You'd really like to sign guys like Victorino/Gomes/Napoli to the types of deals they got within the constraints of that budget? We won 93 games last year and still have guys with development room. Many of the contributors came from trades that we made. We've also made drastic changes in scouting and development. Of course they are looking to make a trade to try and improve the team. That's been the main focus. Hopefully that will happen, but considering the FA market maybe teams are valuing ther guys to high. We'll just have to wait it out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My point is that expecting this whole "masquerade around like we can't afford anyone over $3 million a year" approach to be sustainable is foolish and it's only a matter of time before that fact becomes evident, and it'll probably be sooner rather than later.

Yeah, I'm not going to get mired down in another Angelos can spend more money tirade. We have a pretty fair idea of what the budget constraints are on the team and you're seeing what mid-level free agents are going for just as well as I am.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Back to the point of the original post. I'm sure there is lots of interest in the cavalry. Some teams want to trade for Arrieta - and Bundy. Other teams want to trade for Britton - and Gausman. A few want to trade for Tillman - and Machado. Unfortunately, no one is convinced that any of the cav are sure things anymore. And, you don't get someone like Hosmer or Butler or Myers for less than a sure thing (or at least as sure as any prospect gets).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well I don't get Buck either personally. How in the hell is Tillman not a lock for our rotation if not traded. The same old Orioles IMO ...talking in circles and sounding ridiculous. Personally I'm not hat concerned that nothing has happened yet. But Sheesh the stuff our guys are saying makes them look incompetent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And I'm telling you that only spending money on a bunch of random nobodies and not making any significant trades = several more losing seasons than winning seasons. Be prepared.

It may very well be that our record will decline next year, but last year was also the first in several where we did not commit money to mid level free agents and we did quite well. I'm hoping we can sign McLouth, but I like the fexibility of not being locked in to some of these underpeforming and expensive mid-tier free agents. I'll look for the development of the younger players on our ML roster and some of the nice ones in the minors this year and be hopeful we can develop and acquire more young players to help us in the longer term.

In the mean time, lets hope DD can pull off a trade to help improve the team in addtion to adding some nice depth for us like he did last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How in the hell is Tillman not a lock for our rotation if not traded. The same old Orioles IMO ...talking in circles and sounding ridiculous.

He didn't say Tillman was a lock for the rotation for the same reason he didn't say Machado was a lock to start at third base. They both clearly are, but what good does it do to tell them that today? Make them work for it.

If you're going to insult Buck, at least have a real reason for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He didn't say Tillman was a lock for the rotation for the same reason he didn't say Machado was a lock to start at third base. They both clearly are, but what good does it do to tell them that today? Make them work for it.

If you're going to insult Buck, at least have a real reason for it.

Buck says when he got to Baltimore, there was a bit of a sense of entitlement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Yea.  I feel the same way.  I really do not care strongly one way or another.  Sure, I think it's kind of ugly.  I also think HR's came pretty cheap before.  I like the exciting defensive plays it fosters and of course the random triple & odd carom make for some fun and unique moments.  But I don't think it helps or hurts the team in any substantial way short of helping out the pitching a little.   I sure don't think the players are changing their approaches.  If they keep it as is, that's fine with me.  If they modify it some way, that's fine with me as well.  It does seem like there is some opportunity for some unique seats down there by modifying it slightly.  When I first saw it, it almost appeared like a construction Phase 1.  That might be reasoning for pushing it back so far, allows them some flexibility in the future.   I also don't buy that a Free Agent RH hitter is going to care at all about the wall.   They are getting paid regardless.  I'd think that 1-maximizing payday 2-playing for a winner 3-finding a location that suits your family would be your priorities and your long-term stat line would be very close to the bottom of your list of concerns.  
    • His "ability to play RF" carries about $0 value
    • Yeah but if you think most of this money is going to upgrade things that are wrong or need improving, such as the ones @accinfo lists, I think you'll be disappointed.   They will be for new features, each one designed to create revenue via premium seating or premium "experience" areas or attractions that bring non baseball fans to the park to spend or sports betting related things. I'm not saying they won't fix some basic things that need it like upgrading the sound system or improving the point of sale technology.   I'm sure they will.   But the focus is going to be on the new attractions which are all designed with revenue enhancement in mind.
    • I’m not a lawyer … perhaps @Frobbymight know. Loss of income, future revenues? Damage to their franchise….Even with MASN the Orioles lost a ton on annual tv revenues
    • Congrats to the offense on playing a heck of a game. Lamar was incredible to watch, especially the play when the snap ended up on the ground and he had to run away towards the sideline and still found Likely for the score. It's very frustrating to me that the offense HAD to play so well because of the poor coaching and abysmal defensive play.  It's odd to me that Harbaugh still messes up timeout usage after being a coach in the league for over 15 years.
    • Can someone in 150 words or less explain to me what DYAR is?
    • I have a 3 hour round trip to get to games. I can't speak about other directions, but the stadium is very easy to get to from the south...some more traffic with the earlier start times, but overall - games are VERY easy to get to, imo. You don't have the hike through the city to get to games. I'm a rural guy, and it's really not a big deal. We took the light rail from Cromwell for Game 1 (I usually park in BC or FGH) and it was a breeze. We walked out right after the game, and we immediately caught a direct bus that took us back to Cromwell directly. We did the same thing last year. I gotta be honest - I think the "they've been horrible for half the season" reasoning is pretty lame. Even when they were down (and dealing with significant injuries) after the AS break, they were still essentially a lock to make the playoffs. Then they get healthy-ish with some key guys back riiiiight before the playoffs and look great for a couple of series - but I guess it was too late for everyone?  Come on.  Just say you didn't feel like it. But don't blame August play for not showing up in October.   
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...