Jump to content

Showalter Likes What He Sees in T.J. McFarland


OFFNY

Recommended Posts

McFarland has looked better and better as spring training has progressed. I'm starting to think he'll make the club. If Hunter and McFarland are both in the pen, Buck has two guys who can go 3+ innings, one rights and one lefty, plus it gives him two lefties in the pen. And, if McFarland disappoints, we can always offer him back or offer a trade.

Showalter Likes What He Sees in T.J. McFarland O:smile11:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 83
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Put me down as skeptical about McFarland long term, but I will admit he HAS looked better and better. Was rooting for Britton and Stevie Johnson to have

some sort of role but its apparent to me that its a numbers game and those two with Jake are the odd men out. Still two weeks to go..lots can happen.

I am actually surprised about how well he has done and looked. Could be a fluke, but it appears not to be at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good reminder by Roch today that, if the O's want to keep McFarland but send him to the minors, it is not as simple as just working out a trade with the Indians. He'd also have to pass through waivers.

Speaking of confusion, let me explain how the Orioles could keep or lose Rule 5 pick T.J. McFarland.

The Orioles would have to pass him through waivers and offer him back to the Cleveland Indians before they could send him down to Triple-A Norfolk. Any team claiming him would have to keep him all season, as the Orioles did with Ryan Flaherty last season. The rule doesn't change simply because McFarland changes teams.

Also, the Orioles can trade McFarland, but again, the team acquiring the left-hander would have to keep him on the roster all season or pass him through waivers and offer him back to the Indians. The Orioles could attempt to work out a trade with the Indians, which would enable them to send down McFarland. But again, he'd have to pass through waivers first.

http://www.masnsports.com/school_of_roch/2013/03/this-that-and-the-other-49.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd understand why if we moved Hunter. But I would love to see what he brings to the table in one full season in the pen before we move him. I just can't get over how hard he throws. I was so used to watching him throw 89 MPH cutters - AKA meatballs.

I just don't want another David Hernandez situation. We lost a very valuable arm there.

On another topic, the consensus is that Arrieta will be sent down? I thought he was the leading candidate for the 5th starter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd understand why if we moved Hunter. But I would love to see what he brings to the table in one full season in the pen before we move him. I just can't get over how hard he throws. I was so used to watching him throw 89 MPH cutters - AKA meatballs.

I just don't want another David Hernandez situation. We lost a very valuable arm there.

On another topic, the consensus is that Arrieta will be sent down? I thought he was the leading candidate for the 5th starter.

Yea, the bullpen really suffered last season without him. What with having the highest WPA in history and all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good reminder by Roch today that, if the O's want to keep McFarland but send him to the minors, it is not as simple as just working out a trade with the Indians. He'd also have to pass through waivers.

http://www.masnsports.com/school_of_roch/2013/03/this-that-and-the-other-49.html

I don't think that is true. The purpose of trading for McFarland would be to remove him from the Rule 5 rules. If they did that the O's could use the options he has remaining which I believe would be three.

Here is what Baseball Reference has to say about it:

Occasionally drafting teams will return another player in lieu of the waiver fee if they wish to keep the drafted player in their organization, but send him to the minor leagues during that first year's obligation. This effectively negates the Rule 5 draft by converting the acquisition of the Rule 5 eligible player into a trade, rather than continuing with the Rule 5 obligations of the drafting team.

http://www.baseball-reference.com/bullpen/Rule_V_Draft

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea, the bullpen really suffered last season without him. What with having the highest WPA in history and all.

Do your responses always have to be overly sardonic? David Hernandez emerged as one of the best relievers in baseball last year. Regardless of how well they did last year, in a bullpen that mainly pitches to contact, it'd be nice to have his 13 K/9 and 1.02 WHIP.

My post wasn't a bust on our bullpen, it was recognizing how great Hernandez turned out to be and we saw glimpses of it at the end of 2010 before we traded him. We have seen a glimpse of a great arm in Tommy Hunter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd understand why if we moved Hunter. But I would love to see what he brings to the table in one full season in the pen before we move him. I just can't get over how hard he throws. I was so used to watching him throw 89 MPH cutters - AKA meatballs.

I just don't want another David Hernandez situation. We lost a very valuable arm there.

On another topic, the consensus is that Arrieta will be sent down? I thought he was the leading candidate for the 5th starter.

I wouldn't say consensus yet, but it's getting there. Jake has given up 0 runs but Brian's K/BB is much better. Jake still seems to be nibbling. Brian is attacking hitters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do your responses always have to be overly sardonic? David Hernandez emerged as one of the best relievers in baseball last year. Regardless of how well they did last year, in a bullpen that mainly pitches to contact, it'd be nice to have his 13 K/9 and 1.02 WHIP.

My post wasn't a bust on our bullpen, it was recognizing how great Hernandez turned out to be and we saw glimpses of it at the end of 2010 before we traded him. We have seen a glimpse of a great arm in Tommy Hunter.

Hernandez for Reynolds was a solid trade, even if Reynolds did under perform. Any time you can turn a bullpen arm into an everyday position player you have to seriously consider it. Bullpen arms are pretty easily replaceable. You do realize that Strop and O'Day were both waiver claims right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a little confusing but I think Roch is right. The Orioles can work out a trade for McFarland BUT not before he goes through waivers again, so every team has a chance to claim him under the original Rule 5 rules (must keep him on 25 man roster all year). If McFarland were to pass through waivers the O's could work out a trade but if he gets claimed it's their tough luck. Here's a case which is the exact example of what we are talking about. Read carefully though. The Twins were able to work out a trade for Scott Diamond after he passed through waivers.

http://aarongleeman.com/2011/03/29/twins-trade-billy-bullock-to-keep-rule-5-pick-scott-diamond/

It appears the Twins knew what they are doing. Diamond is now a staple in their rotation and the Bullock is still in the minors...he walked 56 in 59.2 innings last year between AA and AAA...WOW.

It'd be great to work out a trade for McFarland, but I'm not sure who we could give up for him. Hopefully not much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hernandez for Reynolds was a solid trade, even if Reynolds did under perform. Any time you can turn a bullpen arm into an everyday position player you have to seriously consider it. Bullpen arms are pretty easily replaceable. You do realize that Strop and O'Day were both waiver claims right?

Strop came over in the Mike Gonzalez trade. And a pitcher with the K-caliber of David Hernandez would never be a waiver claim.

Your missing what I'm getting at. All I'm saying is that we had David Hernandez under control long term and he's turned into a very dominant reliever. We have seen what Tommy Hunter can bring to the table in the bullpen. I would like to see a full year of it instead of moving him like we did with Hernandez.

I never did like giving him up for Reynolds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It appears the Twins knew what they are doing. Diamond is now a staple in their rotation and the Bullock is still in the minors...he walked 56 in 59.2 innings last year between AA and AAA...WOW.

It'd be great to work out a trade for McFarland, but I'm not sure who we could give up for him. Hopefully not much.

Give up Avery.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • No, you said hitters are far more of a sure thing. It's right up there, a few posts ago.   Why do other teams ever draft pitchers?  Are they stupid? Why doesn't every team just draft hitters and trade them for pitchers?
    • That’s wishful thinking.  I’m not trying to be a buzzkill on a Friday. That’s why I didn’t start a new thread. But the Yankees are a thing. They have the assets in the minors to pull off a trade for a SP and 2-3 bats at the deadline. Rental bats are cheap at the deadline compared to arms. Sometimes it’s just absorbing the contract basically. 
    • This sounds reckless or maybe he's just that high on his speed that he thinks he can leg anything out.  And that he's playing against better competition than he did in college.  Maybe in college he makes it to third because the RF doesn't gather it cleanly, hit the cutoff, etc.   Or maybe he's just that reckless. 
    • It really does feel like this team is just a closer away from having no real holes. So the quotes from Hyde about getting him right and needing him and all that are true (until there's a deal). We know they're not DFA'ing Kimbrel, but I would hope they at least consider IL (if an option) or relegating him to mop up at least for a week or two to work on things. Put Suarez or Cano or Coulombe in the 9th for the time being.  Overall, though, I don't really like any of our guys in 9th and do think a deal (Helsley?) is needed. I love Cano and Coulombe as set up. I'd like to continue to see what Suarez can do in the pen. Perez and Webb seem like solid options in middle relief. Baumann and Kimbrel are the obvious issues at the moment and if I'm being honest, I still don't quite trust Akin. 
    • I actually tend to agree re: having skepticism, but I think a little perspective is in order. The O's knew the hitting profile they were drafting. They just drafted him in the middle of last summer. He's in his first full year of minor league ball. He's playing in a league where a lot of our guys have struggled. Everyone knew significant swing changes were part of his plan. Even with all of that backdrop, as others have pointed out, he's not really doing that bad. So we're less than a year out (much less in baseball days) and we're going to start drawing conclusions about a guy we knew had to develop? At this point, I think Bradfield and the O's deserve a grace period to let the kid develop. It's just waaaaay too early to draw any conclusions, IMO. I've never seen Kenny Lofton potential, but that doesn't mean he can't turn into a first division CF for many years.
    • I think this is a case where OPS might not be the best metric to determine the player.  He's not a power hitter, he's probably not going to be any kind of a power hitter.  I'm not saying he's Ichiro but Ichiro's career OPS was .757...and I don't think that really encapsulates what that guy brought to the table.   What to look for, I believe, is what RZNJ has taken note of, that he's not slapping the ball but he's actually driving it to parts of the ballpark.  That, and his walk rate/OBP.  Right now, there's a .100ish separation between his batting average and his on base percentage.  That's fantastic. So many times we look at what players aren't instead of what they are.  Bradfield was drafted for his elite speed in the field and on the bases and that he's got a good eye at the plate.  He was never advertised as a power hitter, it's unlikely he'll ever have a lot of pop.  And that's okay if he can get on base at a good clip because if he's on base he can do damage.   That's all to get back to my original point, I don't think OPS is the correct metric to measure him by when half of that metric isn't part of his game.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...