Jump to content

Chris Davis Count Down


sevastras

Recommended Posts

Bond's didn't really cheat as they weren't testing for Steroids when he broke the record. He wasn't caught using steroids that season. So the record is perfectly valid. You might not like it but the record is what it is. For all we know Maris was using a corked bat.
They were still against the rules, so he cheated. And he did get caught by the justice system for doing it. So really nobody respects the record. Out of all the inflated HR records in those years, Sosa's stand up the best I guess. But I think most people still think of 61 as the magic number. And by most I'd say upwards of 2/3 of all people who have an opinion on the matter.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 355
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Bonds has never tested positive nor proven in a court of law to have broken any rule by Major League Baseball. There is plenty of circumstantial evidence and many fans can do the simple math of adding 2 and 2 together. But in debates, you need facts not conjecture.

It is fact. He admitted to using "the cream" and "the clear" under oath.

Oh yeah, and there's this:

U.S. attorney spokesman Josh Eaton now says that the reference in Thursday's government court filing regarding Bonds testing positive was actually referring to a November 2000 test that was previously disclosed in the indictment of Bonds and had already been reported.

That drug test was included in the indictment unsealed last year, when prosecutors said the test was for a player they called "Barry B."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lots of arguments here that 'everyone was using anyway so it's okay to cheat, and 'they probably cheated back then too'. Sounds like some of you are in denial about how obviously roided up players were ten years ago, and how damaging it was to the sport.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lots of arguments here that 'everyone was using anyway so it's okay to cheat, and 'they probably cheated back then too'. Sounds like some of you are in denial about how obviously roided up players were ten years ago, and how damaging it was to the sport.

It only damaged the sport because writers and fans got it in their heads that baseball was somehow devoid of cheating or steroid use before the 90's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This isn't a court of law. It's a court of public opinion. And in this court we say Bonds is guilty of cheating.

You, not we. I say he's the all-time home run champion and arguably the greatest player who ever lived. The nice thing about my position is that it's based on his actual record and his actual achievements, whereas your position seems to demand that we all pretend that about 15 years of baseball history never happened.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't have a big issue with PED's, I think the should be legal. But I think a distinction should be made between records aided by PED's, and unaided/ Just as with track and field records, a distinction is made between indoors and out doors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Provided the O's win tomorrow and even better if the Yankees lose tomorrow, the O's will be within range of the division lead. The players are focused on tomorrow's game, but I figured I would take a look ahead at the series. The good:  O's don't have to face Gil or Rodon.  Gil pitched Friday, but Gil seems to have been given extra rest or Yankees are going to 6 man rotation?  O's offense has been resurgent lately and the coldest bats in May are some of the hottest like Santander and Urias and Hays(maybe?).  Gunnar and Adley continue to dependable cogs of the offense. The bad:  Judge has just been mashing the ball since the O's/Yankees early season meeting.  Soto is healthy after the forearm soreness.  Some guy the Yankees signed as a depth move, Cody Poteet, who had a 19-39 minor league record, now has a ERA barely over 2 in limited action.  Poteet is Tuesday's starter.  Cole had 10 K's in 4 1/3 innings in his last rehab start and is likely Wednesday's starter.  Yankees barely have any injuries. The ugly:  The state of the O's bullpen compared to the teams' first meeting.  Danny Coulombe, maybe our best reliever was a huge loss.  Not having Bradish for Thursday game is huge.  Winning 2 of 3 would be great.  Realistically, I would be happy if the O's don't get swept. Tuesday:   Suarez (3-0, 1.61 ERA)  vs Poteet (3-0, 2.14 ERA) Wednesday:  Povich (0-1, 4,76 ERA) vs Undecided (Cole?) 0-0 Thursday:  Irvin (6-3, 3.03 ERA) vs Cortes (3-5, 3.59 ERA)
    • This would be a perfect time for the NYY to go on a nice losing streak...
    • 1) Jack flaherty had like 5 or 6 good starts in a row before we traded for him. His overall era wasn’t great, but the month or so before he had been pitching much better.    2) whip plays a bit better as a reliever if it’s walks and high k rate when they are less worried about managing pitch count over 5+ innings. It’s not ideal but it plays better out of the pen (see dl hall) 3) Burnes is a top 5 pitcher in baseball, and we got him for a full season. Tanner Scott is nowhere near a top 5 reliever and we’d probably get him for 2 months.    if we got Scott for a package like what we gave up for flaherty or a bit better, I’m fine with it. Norby if we are convinced that is the reliever that gets us over the hump. But I’m not sure Scott is that guy, or that we are one reliever away (especially if bradish is out). 
    • 100% There just aren’t that many foolish GMs like there used to be (Bedard trade etc). Teams have a deep brain trust they covet to prevent getting fleeced like the Chris Archer trade.
    • I’d be highly surprised if he didn’t. Can’t argue with the results though. Burnes has pitched 33 innings and given up 4 earned runs in last 5 starts. All with McCann catching him.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...