Jump to content

BP Playoff Odds Snapshot Thread


Frobby

Recommended Posts

The Indians are 13-2 against the Tigers so far this season. So predicting a sweep for them seems almost impossible.

The Indians team right now is not the same time as the one that went 13-2. They lost two of their three best pitchers. I am not predicting a DET sweep, but I would consider DET the favorites in 3 of the 4 games and I see a higher chance of a DET sweep than a CLE sweep.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fangraphs has the Orioles at 72.2%.

I do wonder if Francona will rest his players tonight vs Verlander. Want the Indians to get at least one more this series. Hope the Astros can win at least 1 vs Seattle.

Mariners may be bigger threat now than Detroit.

Let's win this one tonight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fangraphs has the Orioles at 72.2%.

I do wonder if Francona will rest his players tonight vs Verlander. Want the Indians to get at least one more this series. Hope the Astros can win at least 1 vs Seattle.

Mariners may be bigger threat now than Detroit.

Let's win this one tonight.

BP says 69.1%. They've always been slightly more pessimistic about the Orioles' chances than fangraphs over the last few weeks. To your point about the Mariners, BP now says their odds are 21.0% compared to Detroit's 16.4%. Fangraphs disagrees, they say 17.4% Detroit, 16.8% Seattle. Either way, our job is to win enough games to reduce their odds to zero.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BP says 69.1%. They've always been slightly more pessimistic about the Orioles' chances than fangraphs over the last few weeks. To your point about the Mariners, BP now says their odds are 21.0% compared to Detroit's 16.4%. Fangraphs disagrees, they say 17.4% Detroit, 16.8% Seattle. Either way, our job is to win enough games to reduce their odds to zero.

I agree, it is on the Orioles.

I think the Braves will play the Tigers tougher than the A's vs the Mariners.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 10 months later...

Time for the annual resuscitation of this thread.   I'll update it weekly so long as the Orioles are still in the race.

Team/Current Record/Projected Record/Playoff Odds/Division Odds

BOS 63-49 88-74 90.4 50.8

NYY 59-51 88-74 89.2 43.8

TBR 58-55 83-79 39.9 04.8

BAL 55-56 78-84 05.8  00.5

TOR 52-59 76-86 02.5 00.1

 

CLE 59-50 90-72 95.4 90.7

KCR 57-53 82-80 32.1 07.9

MIN 53-56 78-84 06.1 01.1

DET 51-59 76-86 02.1 00.3

 

HOU 71-40 101-61 100.0 100.0

SEA 57-56 81-81 22.7 00.0

LAA 55-57 79-83 07.5 00.0

TEX 53-58 78-84 05.9 00.0

 

It's interesting to see that the Twins and Angels are both given better odds than us despite being behind us in the standings.    

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The twins, Angels & rangers are abysmal. There is little depth in either league with the NL WC certain to go to a lousy team as well. A year where selling & making the playoffs is more likely than most, as the Rangers may succeed in doing. Houston, Clev & Boston are the only teams who I feel we are outmatched against at full strength - and we haven't had a single reliable SP this year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Cumberbundy said:

The twins, Angels & rangers are abysmal. There is little depth in either league with the NL WC certain to go to a lousy team as well. A year where selling & making the playoffs is more likely than most, as the Rangers may succeed in doing. Houston, Clev & Boston are the only teams who I feel we are outmatched against at full strength - and we haven't had a single reliable SP this year. 

Colorado (64-48) and Arizona (63-48) hold the 2 NL WC spots right now, so I'm not sure about your comment.  Colorado has more wins than every other team save LAD, HOU, WAS - same with Arizona except they are tied in wins with BOS.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, glenn__davis said:

With absolutely no analytical observations made, 5.8% for a playoff berth sounds about right.  

I know it's the west coast, and they are road games, but you should take a gander at Oak and LAA's teams. LAA has one regular over a .700 OPS(Trout).  OAK looks like a AAA rotation and lineup sans a couple guys. 

We have a superior lineup and pen. Maybe even an advantage on the pitching. We need to be able to go 4-2 in those 6 games. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Bleacher seats are $12 Mon-Thursday 
    • Lee May's bat wagged like an excited dog's tail...
    • Gotta like the BB:K ratio and there's hope in the adage of "doubles become HRs".
    • Heston missed a 2-0 meatball, but crushed the next pitch for a single. He also had a nice sliding catch in the field. We’re facing a string of lefties, and we have some off days, so he might only start 2 times in the next 9 days because of that.  It is what it is. No knock on big Heston. He’s a part of our future. We’re just playing winning baseball and need to win each game. 
    • Your conspiracy theories against teams just screwing over the millionaire ball players are pretty epic. No one is going to hold a IL stint for a few weeks in his 2nd season against him in anything. This line of thinking is so over the the top its not funny. Every pitcher has soreness after starts. Maybe Grayson has had a little extra and they just want to calm down the soreness and the fact that they need a spot in the rotation while coming up against "weaker" opponents is a good time to get him settled down, and keep him fresher for later in the year. Why do you think Grayson or anyone would have a problem with that line of thinking? A "phantom" IL stint is a Jimenez pothole IL stint where the pitcher can't be removed from the active roster but is pitching so poorly that they just want to reset him a bit and get a pitcher on the roster that can help. At the end of the day, what we all need to hope is this is just a cautionary IL stint to calm down some shoulder soreness and not anything more. 
    • For most of baseball history there were weird, idiosyncratic things players did and for the most part they were left alone. Because whatever strange stance, windup, delivery or technique that they had, they were in the majors. Clearly it was working. HOFer Al Simmons was known as Bucketfoot Al because he stepped towards 3rd when batting. If the internet had existed in 1924, the first time he went into a slump the screaming and gnashing of teeth would have been unrelenting. Send this idiot back to the minors, he's never going to hit like that against real pitchers!  Mel Ott, another HOFer, 2nd guy to get to 500 homers, had a leg kick that puts Holliday to shame. Disco Dan Ford batted with his back to the pitcher. He was so oddly situated in the box that teams would play him (a RHH) like a left-handed pull hitter. Luis Tiant had that windup that ended up with his back to the batter in mid-delivery. The internet coaches would have savaged all of them at the first 3-game slump. I'm half convinced that all those kind of things mostly disappeared just to stop the wailing from the peanut gallery.
    • Adley had the most balls called strikes on him last year in the MLB. Leaving it up to the umps didn’t work last year. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...