Jump to content

Rosenthal says deal done Jimenez (4/$50M - Official)


Greg

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 464
  • Created
  • Last Reply
This. He was terrible in Cleveland until the second half of last year (where he was phenomenal). I don't feel good about this. Giving up a draft pick for him plus four years seems like a bad idea to me.

Yeah, the pick plus the distinct possibility that this deal will kill any chance for extensions down the road.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, if they give Jimenez a 4 year dea that will put the myth the O's won't go over 3 years on a SP. Maybe the 100m cap is just a myth as well? And I think 107m for this team is very reasonable and very do-able. And imo would and could still leave them room at the trade deadpine to take on another 3-6m.

It could be 3 years with a vesting option. These types of things tend to leak from player's representatives rather than team representatives, so the early numbers can be a little inflated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This. He was terrible in Cleveland until the second half of last year (where he was phenomenal). I don't feel good about this. Giving up a draft pick for him plus four years seems like a bad idea to me.

The alternative was Joe Saunders. Is that who you would prefer?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Keith Law had him as the #4 overall FA this offseason after Cano, Ellsbury, and Tanaka.

He'll pitch at 30 years old in 2014 and looks like a new guy out there, establishing the fastball earlier in counts, throwing it for more strikes and getting more swings and misses on it. That allows him to set up his plus slider, short and hard at 85-87 mph, as well as a low- to mid-80s splitter with good bottom that helps him against left-handed hitters.

The lack of track record is terrifying, but a 30-year-old with this kind of stuff and his newfound control has to get four years, if not more, in this kind of market, likely for $14 million to $15 million a year.

- Keith Law

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rosenthal confirms Roch's numbers

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Source says numbers reported by <a href="https://twitter.com/masnRoch">@masnroch</a> for <a href="https://twitter.com/search?q=%23Orioles&src=hash">#Orioles</a>? deal with Jimenez - four years, $48M - are ?close? to actual value.</p>— Ken Rosenthal (@Ken_Rosenthal) <a href="

">February 17, 2014</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I was going to post something about this after reading about that on MLBTR this morning. That gives me a lot of hope for Bradish if this kid can come back from a UCL sprain and throw 103. Obviously, reliever vs. starter so who knows. But uplifting to read nonetheless. 
    • Hollocher hit almost exclusively 2nd in the order. The Cubs' 3rd hitters (and it was the Cubs, not the Indians as I previously stated) were mostly Marty Krug, Zeb Terry, and John Kelleher. Krug was awful for a 1922 3rd-place hitter, with an 83 OPS+ in his only season as a MLB regular, but he only struck out 43 times in 524 PAs. Terry was worse, OPS+ing 74, but with just 16 Ks in 571 PAs. And Kelleher was the worst of the bunch, OPS+ing 60, while striking out 14 times in 222 PAs. Cubs manager Reindeer Bill Killefer stuck hard and fast to the old rule of thumb that the catcher should bat 8th, even if it's Bob O'Farrell and he hit .324 with an .880 OPS. Ray Grimes had a 1.014 OPS and batted cleanup. But Hack Miller and his .899 OPS batted mostly 6th. Statz wasn't a terrible leadoff hitter, was one of only a couple players who had a SB% higher than 50%, but was 6th among their regulars in OBP. That's as bad a bunch of #3 hitters as I've seen in a while, yet the Cubs finished 80-74-2. Just goes to show you batting order doesn't really matter. Anyway, back to the main point... yes, I'm sure some of Hollocher's CS were busted hit-and-runs. But nobody that regularly batted behind him struck out in even 7% of PAs so they shoulda been putting the ball in play the vast majority of the time.    
    • Bobby needs to git gud. 
    • How many people actually said they were one of the greatest teams ever?   They did hit the snot out of the ball the first 9 games of the year, mostly in a 6 game series in a very hitter-friendly ball park against a bad pitching staff.  That said, they’re still second in the league in runs per game.  Their pitching has been problematic, yielding 6.50 runs per game.  
    • Gunnar’s base running is in the 99th percentile.  That mess is in the 98th percentile.
    • Yeah, the highlighted section here is really why I agree that the O's will look to minimize losing players to waivers just yet. Things could blow up on them pretty quick. There's a ton of risk with these moves, but they have to find out. The best way to do that is to utilize the options for Akin and Tate, IMO. We'll see! 
    • There are some in this very thread including responses to my post up top. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...