Jump to content

Was ERod too much for Andrew Miller


isestrex

ERod for Miller  

224 members have voted

  1. 1. ERod for Miller

    • It's a steal
      30
    • I'm fine with that price but I'll miss him.
      147
    • Too much: worried about only 2 months of Miller vs a long career of ERod
      47


Recommended Posts

I am also over not having Jose Bautista and Jayson Werth on this team. And I am over not drafting Mike Trout. Stuff happens. It gave us the best chance we have had since 1997 of being in the World Series. I hope his arm falls off just so we don't have to hear this every time he pitches against us for the next five years.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 452
  • Created
  • Last Reply
No, obviously you didn't read full my post. I stated that if EdRod ends up with a career similar to CC Sabathia, will this be just as bad as the Glenn Davis trade? I'm proposing a hypothetical. I think someone else is jumping to conclusions.

No, not even close. Schilling in his prime was way, way better than CC in his prime, and Schilling sustained his prime longer than CC. Plus Finley and Harnisch. The Davis trade was the worst trade ever. This has the potential to be merely a bad trade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nothing is worse than the Glenn Davis trade. Eddie Murray trade sucked too. Anything Syd Thrift touched....

Andrew Miller helped us, it just wasn't enough.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Baseball karma...we got Frank Robby for Milt Pappas and Jones/Tillman for Bedard...Davis trade is our payback fail.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, obviously you didn't read full my post. I stated that if EdRod ends up with a career similar to CC Sabathia, will this be just as bad as the Glenn Davis trade? I'm proposing a hypothetical. I think someone else is jumping to conclusions.

BTW, I'm not condemning the front office or saying that we shouldn't have made the trade at the time. I was more or less neutral on the trade when it occurred. I thought it was high risk and wasn't happy that Miller was a two month rental. I felt a player like EdRod should have gotten at least a year and change of Miller.

We also didn't win anything with Miller. I don't care what anyone says. He wasn't the difference in us winning the division because as good as he was he wasn't worth 12 games. And maybe the Tigers series is closer (4-1 or 4-2), but we win that one too. So in the end he wasn't a difference maker.

No one is jumping to conclusions here. I am proposing a question. I think it is UNDENIABLE that EdRod's stuff is comparable to a prime CC.

I think one of the reasons the Orioles made the push to acquire him was to keep him away from the Tigers.

The Tigers bullpen was a mess last year and Miller would have been their closer had they acquired him.

I beg to differ that he has not a difference maker. He was pretty much lights out in the set up role once he was acquired.

Here's a bit of his pitching line from last year with the Orioles (from Baseball reference):

23 games 2-0 1 save 1.35 ERA 20 IP 34 k's 4 BB WHiP 0.600.

You may disagree but I think he made a difference in the stretch drive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, not even close. Schilling in his prime was way, way better than CC in his prime, and Schilling sustained his prime longer than CC. Plus Finley and Harnisch. The Davis trade was the worst trade ever. This has the potential to be merely a bad trade.

Schilling was already somewhat of a failed prospect when he was traded. More of a Jake Arrietta scenario.

Obviously from a results standpoint nothing will compare to the Glenn Davis trade. But I think there are some mitigating factors at play there. Most notably that the team we traded those guys to didn't get the benefit of the bulk of their productivity. That's not going to be the case with the Red Sox and EdRod.

Don't forget that he is also in our division and we will have to face him five times a year until 2021 at the earliest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would also include on our historic pluses ....the Ken Singleton, Mike Torrez to us for Dave McNally who retired, Rich Coggins deal...and the Scott McGregor, Tippy Martinez, Rick Dempsey for the over the hills Elrod, Doyle Alexander, Grant Jackson, Ken Holtzman deal.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think one of the reasons the Orioles made the push to acquire him was to keep him away from the Tigers.

The Tigers bullpen was a mess last year and Miller would have been their closer had they acquired him.

I beg to differ that he has not a difference maker. He was pretty much lights out in the set up role once he was acquired.

Here's a bit of his pitching line from last year with the Orioles (from Baseball reference):

23 games 2-0 1 save 1.35 ERA 20 IP 34 k's 4 BB WHiP 0.600.

You may disagree but I think he made a difference in the stretch drive.

He made as much of a difference as anyone on the team down the stretch, sure.

But no one player was the difference between us winning or not winning the division or making or not making the ALCS after August 1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would also include on our historic pluses ....the Ken Singleton, Mike Torrez to us for Dave McNally who retired, Rich Coggins deal...and the Scott McGregor, Tippy Martinez, Rick Dempsey for the over the hills Elrod, Doyle Alexander, Grant Jackson, Ken Holtzman deal.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Frank Robinson, Adam Jones.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He made as much of a difference as anyone on the team down the stretch, sure.

But no one player was the difference between us winning or not winning the division or making or not making the ALCS after August 1.

Disagree.

His numbers don't lie.

He was the perfect set up man for the bullpen at that point in time.

They may have won the division without him, but once they acquired him it was game over if they were up by a run in the seventh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Schilling was already somewhat of a failed prospect when he was traded. More of a Jake Arrietta scenario.

Obviously from a results standpoint nothing will compare to the Glenn Davis trade. But I think there are some mitigating factors at play there. Most notably that the team we traded those guys to didn't get the benefit of the bulk of their productivity. That's not going to be the case with the Red Sox and EdRod.

Don't forget that he is also in our division and we will have to face him five times a year until 2021 at the earliest.

I just hope we don't have this same thread every time till then. And that presumes an awful lot. Like health for instance. Ever think any pitcher ever gets hurt between now and 2021?

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • How about..." we wont win another game in the regular season"?
    • i still like that winning your division matters, at least a little bit.  So I think there's a happy medium between how unbalanced it was, and what you are suggesting.  13 games vs each division team feels right to me, but there are going to be years where that skews the WC thing a bit, because there's always one really bad team, it seems, somewhere (not always as bad as the ChiSox, of course).  I'm not sure how else to further balance it.  Maybe cut back on the NL stuff a bit and play more games against your non-divisional conference rivals so at least there's more head to head to base the WC on.
    • Apparently this post of mine from one year ago killed this thread, as it was the last before today's bump.  In re-reading that, I am reminded (by a past version of myself, LOL) of why I love this sport.  It was actually a bit invigorating reading that back to myself.  LETS GO BIRDS!
    • I've found the older I get, the less interest I have in watching my teams lose. It's a waste of time so I find something else to do. Watching my team lose is not enjoyable so I'd rather do something I'd enjoy. It's not like I'm that old either, just 47. I get a lot more enjoyment out of watching good games with other teams, to be honest. Watching the Bills in the first half last night was fun. The Redskins/Bengals game was fun to watch. Man City and Arsenal on Sunday was great. The Chiefs/Falcons game was a good game. There were a few decent college football games this last weekend as well. I'll watch the game to start tonight and if the O's are down 3-0 after the 1st inning, I'll find something else to do, probably watch some of the other MLB games that have playoff implications.
    • It will be interesting to see if there is any carry over from the HBP's culminating in Heston's beaning.  Hate to say it but that's around when the .500 play started, now much worse.  I did like the way HK stared down Holmes after being hit-I think this series will mean a little more to him.
    • It’s O’s and Yanks. Good guys versus bad guys. Baby Birds up against the Evil Empire — and another trip to the post-season is in the cards. I’ve been cheering for the O’s and very specifically against the Yanks going on six decades, and I’m getting good at it. So, yeah. I’m fired up. Now ask me about hopes and dreams. I don’t think this Orioles team is going to make a run to WS this year.  They have scuffled, they have failed — but I’m reminded, even in the platinum age of data — baseball is still a game of failure.  And man, runners in scoring position over the last week, I’m not sure I want to know that number. They’re still my guys. As long as they’re in it, so am I.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...