Jump to content

Brian Roberts to retire


auzzy98

Recommended Posts

I don't remember all of the details, but didn't Roberts make an out, get frustrated, and then just kind of bopped himself on his batting helmet with the bat? Who in the world would think that could cause a concussion? You see football players bump helmets without thinking about it, and this can't be that much more severe, it just happened to be a freak thing.

Maybe I'm missing some crucial detail, but I always thought this was a pretty innocent thing that just happened to line up all wrong.

I had always assumed that the hitting himself in the head with the bat story was just a story to cover something that happened that he didn't want made public. It's not that unusual for players to hurt themselves doing things they are not supposed to be doing and then make up a story about how it happened.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 177
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Roberts has rubbed me the wrong way for years before his injury. He played not 100%. The guy didnt run it out to first base most times. Made a host of mental errors while playing and seemed to moan over and over about how hard it was to concentrate at the end of the season when your team was sucking and ten to twenty games out of it. He didnt provide much leadership.

As i said I dont miss him one bit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had always assumed that the hitting himself in the head with the bat story was just a story to cover something that happened that he didn't want made public. It's not that unusual for players to hurt themselves doing things they are not supposed to be doing and then make up a story about how it happened.

I once read that Jim Lonborg did that in between the 1967 and 1968 seasons ...... and shortly afterward, he admitted to doing it !!!

When a reporter (who allegedly knew what really happened) confronted Lonborg on why he didn't tell the truth, he simply said, "I had to. The heat was too much."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Roberts has rubbed me the wrong way for years before his injury. He played not 100%. The guy didnt run it out to first base most times. Made a host of mental errors while playing and seemed to moan over and over about how hard it was to concentrate at the end of the season when your team was sucking and ten to twenty games out of it. He didnt provide much leadership.

As i said I dont miss him one bit.

There's a lot of revisionist history in this post. Roberts did not make a "host" of mental errors. It isn't true that he didn't run hard to first base "most" times. I'd say he made fewer mental errors than most players, and while it's true that there were times where he didn't run at 100% to first base, it certainly wasn't most of the time, and he certainly didn't jog down there. I personally don't think he was worse than most players in that regard, or if he was below average, it wasn't by much.

The Brian Roberts I'll remember is the one who had great, patient at bats, the one who distracted opposing pitchers mightily when he was on the bases, the one who had a very high success rate stealing bases, especially stealing 3B, who hit a ton of doubles, who was troublesome from both sides of the plate, who ran charity functions in his spare time. I'm sorry his four year deal worked out so poorly, but that doesn't cause me to forget that BRob was an excellent, exciting, heads-up player for most of the time he was an Oriole.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's a lot of revisionist history in this post. Roberts did not make a "host" of mental errors. It isn't true that he didn't run hard to first base "most" times. I'd say he made fewer mental errors than most players, and while it's true that there were times where he didn't run at 100% to first base, it certainly wasn't most of the time, and he certainly didn't jog down there. I personally don't think he was worse than most players in that regard, or if he was below average, it wasn't by much.

The Brian Roberts I'll remember is the one who had great, patient at bats, the one who distracted opposing pitchers mightily when he was on the bases, the one who had a very high success rate stealing bases, especially stealing 3B, who hit a ton of doubles, who was troublesome from both sides of the plate, who ran charity functions in his spare time. I'm sorry his four year deal worked out so poorly, but that doesn't cause me to forget that BRob was an excellent, exciting, heads-up player for most of the time he was an Oriole.

I used to enjoy his at bats where he would foul off 12 pitches before getting a hit and then immediately steal second, and third.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I once read that Jim Lonborg did that in between the 1967 and 1968 seasons ...... and shortly afterward, he admitted to doing it !!!

When a reporter (who allegedly knew what really happened) confronted Lonborg on why he didn't tell the truth, he simply said, "I had to. The heat was too much."

Lonborg's contract prohibited him from skiing, which he did anyway and blew out his knee. When the truth came out, he lost his contract. And that was coming off a season (1967) in which he'd won 22 games and led the Sox to a 7 game World Series. He didn't start as many as 30 games again until 1972.

In 2002, Jeff Kent broke his hand "washing his truck." Everyone laughed about it for a while until eyewitnesses who'd seen Kent attempting to pop wheelies on his motorcycle (contract violation) came forward. It didn't make much difference for Kent, as he only missed four games and had a good year.

When players hurt themselves doing embarrassing things, they lie about it.

Roberts is a guy who had already tried to get around the rules by using steroids. Not until the evidence was irrefutable did he admit the truth. Until there is concrete proof that he received a concussion that affected him for several years by tapping himself on the head with his bat, I'm skeptical.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lonborg's contract prohibited him from skiing, which he did anyway and blew out his knee. When the truth came out, he lost his contract. And that was coming off a season (1967) in which he'd won 22 games and led the Sox to a 7 game World Series. He didn't start as many as 30 games again until 1972.

In 2002, Jeff Kent broke his hand "washing his truck." Everyone laughed about it for a while until eyewitnesses who'd seen Kent attempting to pop wheelies on his motorcycle (contract violation) came forward. It didn't make much difference for Kent, as he only missed four games and had a good year.

When players hurt themselves doing embarrassing things, they lie about it.

Roberts is a guy who had already tried to get around the rules by using steroids. Not until the evidence was irrefutable did he admit the truth. Until there is concrete proof that he received a concussion that affected him for several years by tapping himself on the head with his bat, I'm skeptical.

So, guilty until proven innocent, huh?

On the steroids matter, the evidence was hardly irrefutable. All the Mitchell report contained was a statement by Larry Bigbie that Roberts had told him, in 2004, that Roberts had tried steroids "once or twice" in 2003. It would have been very easy for Roberts to simply deny Bigbie's statement -- there was no evidence at all other than Bigbie's say-so. But Roberts chose to admit that Bigbie's statement was true. I'm not nominating him for sainthood, but it isn't the case that he admitted his steroid use because he had to.

When someone comes up with evidence that Roberts got a concussion from something other than hitting his helmet with a baseball bat, let me know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, guilty until proven innocent, huh?

On the steroids matter, the evidence was hardly irrefutable. All the Mitchell report contained was a statement by Larry Bigbie that Roberts had told him, in 2004, that Roberts had tried steroids "once or twice" in 2003. It would have been very easy for Roberts to simply deny Bigbie's statement -- there was no evidence at all other than Bigbie's say-so. But Roberts chose to admit that Bigbie's statement was true. I'm not nominating him for sainthood, but it isn't the case that he admitted his steroid use because he had to.

When someone comes up with evidence that Roberts got a concussion from something other than hitting his helmet with a baseball bat, let me know.

Actually, he could not deny it. He was being subpoenaed to testify before the congress on the issue. He supposedly was able to avoid that by acknowledging that Bigbie was accurate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is a BIG difference between taking it once or twice and being a regular user like some was.

Neither is right.

However, once or twice, I can understand, won't condone, people are human and people do make mistakes.

Anybody that says otherwise is just so full of crapola, it isn't funny.

I refuse to condemn a person for admitting to being less than perfect.

If evidence shows he is a liar, then, I will change my opinion of the man and consider him with the Bonds and A-Rod of MLB and a total a-hole.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is a BIG difference between taking it once or twice and being a regular user like some was.

Neither is right.

However, once or twice, I can understand, won't condone, people are human and people do make mistakes.

Anybody that says otherwise is just so full of crapola, it isn't funny.

I refuse to condemn a person for admitting to being less than perfect.

If evidence shows he is a liar, then, I will change my opinion of the man and consider him with the Bonds and A-Rod of MLB and a total a-hole.

I have no idea how many times any player uses enhancement. Until they are caught the number they always say is zero. When they are caught the number always remains one. Unless there are documented instances of two, three, four, and five.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's a lot of revisionist history in this post. Roberts did not make a "host" of mental errors. It isn't true that he didn't run hard to first base "most" times. I'd say he made fewer mental errors than most players, and while it's true that there were times where he didn't run at 100% to first base, it certainly wasn't most of the time, and he certainly didn't jog down there. I personally don't think he was worse than most players in that regard, or if he was below average, it wasn't by much.

The Brian Roberts I'll remember is the one who had great, patient at bats, the one who distracted opposing pitchers mightily when he was on the bases, the one who had a very high success rate stealing bases, especially stealing 3B, who hit a ton of doubles, who was troublesome from both sides of the plate, who ran charity functions in his spare time. I'm sorry his four year deal worked out so poorly, but that doesn't cause me to forget that BRob was an excellent, exciting, heads-up player for most of the time he was an Oriole.

Excellent post. Well said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, guilty until proven innocent, huh?

On the steroids matter, the evidence was hardly irrefutable. All the Mitchell report contained was a statement by Larry Bigbie that Roberts had told him, in 2004, that Roberts had tried steroids "once or twice" in 2003. It would have been very easy for Roberts to simply deny Bigbie's statement -- there was no evidence at all other than Bigbie's say-so. But Roberts chose to admit that Bigbie's statement was true. I'm not nominating him for sainthood, but it isn't the case that he admitted his steroid use because he had to.

When someone comes up with evidence that Roberts got a concussion from something other than hitting his helmet with a baseball bat, let me know.

I didn't say he was guilty, I said I was skeptical. You should know the difference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How does someone try steroids once or twice? He may have said that to Bigbie but I'm skeptical that he was telling Bigbie the truth. Again, I'm no expert on steroids, but I don't think it's something you "try" once or twice. To try and see the effects, wouldn't you have had to have done it a lot more than once or twice?

You know no person that ever tried pot once or twice?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I hadn’t noticed until you wrote this, but Beavers is in a bit of a funk, .423 OPS over his last 8 games.  
    • You must have missed the memo that the Yankees will never lose another game this season. Time to prepare for the WC round.
    • Pitch to contact guys aren’t optimal in Oct.  allow the best teams and best offenses to hit and hope you catch it isn’t a good strategy.  Zero people believe that. In not worried that Burnes will do that but he’s a guy you acquired to be your Game 1, shut down guy who carries your rotation through a postseason. He won’t be that missing less than 10 bats and striking out 4 guys. Anyway, I’m not saying this is what Burnes will do. I’m saying if this trend continues, I don’t see him being the guy we hoped he would be.  I was very clear about that.    So no, I’m not saying I don’t have faith in him because I don’t think he’s going to become some middling pitch to contact guy.
    • Roberts would make good CF for Orioles . The problem is they need pitching upgrades . After they acquired the pitchers, who would they have left to trade for Roberts ?
    • To Tony’s point about backdoor cutter, here was location of all Povich pitches yesterday.  I would think quite unusual to backdoor so many cutters against RHHs (vs jamming on the hands which he did sporadically) while also predominantly working curveball backdoor as well.  Compare to cutters from other LHPs like Crochet, Cortes, Fried, Tyler Anderson where heatmaps show inside bias.  Povich went there more so with his four seamer.  The other thing to notice is how Povich worked basically all over parts of the zone (compare to Burnes heatmaps where he essentially is never up and away).  It’s only one start, so will be interested to see how pitch mix and location evolves for Povich.
    • Yea. I think what you and most others said was something to the effect of, he can play there if you need him to but you don’t really want him there everyday. In the SSS we saw here last year, I felt that opinion was correct but again, it was a SSS, so I tried not to put more weight in that than what most evaluators were saying. But I do think we all tend to forget, at times, that young players aren’t finished products and if they choose to put the work in, they will get better. This is my stance on Holliday going to SS.  I am not disagreeing with people who doubt his arm or something like that.  Where I disagree is acting like he’s a finished product at age 20. Now, he may very well be because maybe he doesn’t put the time and effort into things that he should and because of it, he won’t reach his defensive ceiling. I just tend to doubt that with that kid.
    • As far as baseball stats go,  EV allowed reaches a significant sample (r >= 0.7) pretty quickly, at around 40 BIP, and stays more or less in that range over quite a long period.  It fluctuates oddly when you go beyond a sample of 40, but it remains fairly close to that 0.7.  There aren't many stats that show better reliability in baseball.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...