Jump to content

Nick Markakis wins Gold Glove


Greg

Recommended Posts

He is as valuable as Taylor Teagarden. Period. He is not even really a ball player.

You've just got a neverending supply of ridiculous, don't you.

He's been worth 7-8 WAR in less than 2 seasons' worth of plate appearances. Your personal issues with him don't change the fact that KC probably wouldn't have made it to the playoffs without him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 128
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Positions and awarding GGs based on them are kind of an artificial construct. The Gold Glove at first is like asking who was the AAA MVP. The best guy who couldn't hack it at a higher level. The guy who got moved down to an easier assignment because his org was really strong at his natural slot.

The way the GGs are now, if the O's played David Lough in RF all year in 2015 he might be the GG winner. But he probably wouldn't be if Adam Jones contracted the plague and Lough had to play center all year. Schoop might be a contender at second, but if Manny wasn't at third Schoop might have ended up there and probably isn't nearly as good a third baseman. LF/RF is where you go if you don't have the range for center, 2B/3B is where you go if you don't have SS range, and the best defensive first baseman of all time probably isn't as valuable as an average shortstop.

There are probably four dozen players in AAA (and many in lower classifications) who are better fielders than some MLB Gold Glovers.

Clearly the solution is to scale Gold Gloves by size with a first baseman's Gold Glove the size of a thimble and a shortstop's Gold Glove the size of a Prius. They tried to remedy this with the Platinum Glove. I expect 75 plus percent Platinum Gloves over time to go to shortstops.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Clearly the solution is to scale Gold Gloves by size with a first baseman's Gold Glove the size of a thimble and a shortstop's Gold Glove the size of a Prius. They tried to remedy this with the Platinum Glove. I expect 75 plus percent Platinum Gloves over time to go to shortstops.

I suspect you will be wrong. It will not happen in the AL this season and might not in the NL, where a right fielder might win it.

I fully expect Manny to win a few more and could see someone like Molina being a winner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It devalues the individual positions. Does anyone think that the Gold Glove winner at first base is a better defensive player than the guy who finished second in gold glove voting at shortstop? Of course not. But they don't have four infield gold gloves either.

Of course.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You've just got a neverending supply of ridiculous, don't you.

He's been worth 7-8 WAR in less than 2 seasons' worth of plate appearances. Your personal issues with him don't change the fact that KC probably wouldn't have made it to the playoffs without him.

Dyson? That is who we were talking about. Not Cain. Cain is fine. Dyson is ridiculous. Not me. Cain is very good. Apologize to make me feel better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You've just got a neverending supply of ridiculous, don't you.

He's been worth 7-8 WAR in less than 2 seasons' worth of plate appearances. Your personal issues with him don't change the fact that KC probably wouldn't have made it to the playoffs without him.

Two years worth of plate appearances over six years does not count the same as WAR accumulated in two years. You know that friend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Two years worth of plate appearances over six years does not count the same as WAR accumulated in two years. You know that friend.

Okay. He hasn't been given a full-time job because his manager is bad at his job. I guess his accumulated WAR means nothing. You're right. He isn't a real baseball player.

And he's played five years, only three with more than 65 PAs. 7.1 WAR over the past three. More than Markakis and Wieters in a fraction of their PAs. Happy?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wasn't saying that he's seen as a better defensive player; I think he clearly IS a better defensive player.

And he wasn't a finalist because he didn't play enough games at any one position, which I guess is an unintended consequence of trying to be more fair to corner outfielders..

I knew what you meant. My question was rhetorical. As in, "Why should it matter to voters how many games he 'started' in CF?" Especially, when he played a good number at another position.

It doesn't make any sense that the guy wins the MP FB award yet can't even get nominated for the position he plays most of the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This isn't true.

Correct; Dyson has a tick more rWAR than Lough over the last two years:

4.4 Dyson

4.1 Lough

Dyson's a good ballplayer. Career .323 OBP and a sick 120-20 SB/CS ratio. Maybe his value is all speed; so be it. But once again, how in the world does he impact Markakis' Gold Glove chances? That's what this thread is about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay. He hasn't been given a full-time job because his manager is bad at his job. I guess his accumulated WAR means nothing. You're right. He isn't a real baseball player.

And he's played five years, only three with more than 65 PAs. 7.1 WAR over the past three. More than Markakis and Wieters in a fraction of their PAs. Happy?

If he had to play against pitchers all the time his OWAR would negate his DWAR. It's another one of those fluky KC memes. Dyson would not play anywhere else either. And Yost is a runner up for Manger of the Year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Correct; Dyson has a tick more rWAR than Lough over the last two years:

4.4 Dyson

4.1 Lough

Dyson's a good ballplayer. Career .323 OBP and a sick 120-20 SB/CS ratio. Maybe his value is all speed; so be it. But once again, how in the world does he impact Markakis' Gold Glove chances?

Because his great defense and Cain's great defense should eclipse Nick and Adam. Because. They Are. K.C.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Correct; Dyson has a tick more rWAR than Lough over the last two years:

4.4 Dyson

4.1 Lough

Dyson's a good ballplayer. Career .323 OBP and a sick 120-20 SB/CS ratio. Maybe his value is all speed; so be it. But once again, how in the world does he impact Markakis' Gold Glove chances? That's what this thread is about.

Also I say he is a pinch runner. Not a ball player. It is all me. By the way. It's not like he is 24 and might learn to hit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I'm not sure how they'll handle the end of the NYY series.  A single game might be a pure matchup and trend line question that could bump Irvin ahead of Bradish (I haven't looked but based on other posts...). After that, Burnes/Grayson/Bradish is our top 3.  Then Kremer is a solid #4. Maybe the use their positional flexibility thing for the #5 spot and play the matchup deciding between LHP Irvin and RHP Suarez?  It just would take a little planning ahead to know which is available out of the pen over a few days ahead of the next scheduled start. Ramirez is a voted off the island. Means gets squeezed a bit at this point.  He hasn't shown enough to be ahead of Irvin or Suarez this year.  Each start in AAA carries a lot of weight though. They will play the controllable arms gam with those who have options for a little while.  Baumann, Webb and Akin have to post up from here on.  This is the group when Perez and Wells are back.  I'm not sure what Akin is doing but I wonder if it's sustainable. Assuming health and expectations:  Kimbrel, Cano, Coloumbe, Tate, Suarez/Irvin, (Perez, Wells).   Which leaves one spot to be upgraded...  I'd love to get a guy ahead of Cano (market depending). But the Cano/Coloumbe tier is my floor.
    • I started that thread and deleted it.   The thread was not about who should or shouldn’t be in the rotation.   It was a HYPOTHETICAL about who people would want in the bullpen IF Bradish and Means were inserted  into the rotation AND IF Wells and Perez were activated. I laid out the rules of the hypothetical and twice explained to just make the choices based on the hypothetical.  4 posters responded.  3 have no clue what “hypothetical” means, including you. The fact that you think the thread was about who should be in the rotation justifies what I called you.  LOL
    • I actually thought those unis looked a lot better with white pants, which I don’t think they had worn before. Black pants just never look right. 
    • It is a tough decision because Irvin has shown he can also do well out of the pen, where as Means hasn’t. I think it will work itself out even if the initial decision doesn’t end up being the best one.
    • That’s okay.  Ask some Red Sox fan if anyone ever hit a home run completely out of Memorial Stadium.  They will give you one of three answers: 1.   “I don’t know.” 2.  “I remember Sam Horn almost did it.” 3.  “What’s Memorial Stadium?”
    • You do need to wonder if there’s some underlying physical problem.  McDermott has always had command issues, but 23 walks in 21.1 innings makes me think something could be wrong.  
    • You know the Orioles must be doing well so far when in 2024 when there are more pages discussing the lead TV announcer than the team's manager. 😀 I've heard them all and I Like Kevin. Not Chuck - Not John - but darn good at his craft with room and time to grow.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...