Jump to content

Set up perfectly for a new G.M.?


Bahama O's Fan

Recommended Posts

If Oday pitches lights out.

If Angelos continues to allow the payroll to rise as it has been each year.

Yes' date=' I would offer it and if he takes it, they say there is no such thing as a bad one year contract.[/quote']

Lights out or not no team is going to view him as a closer.

There is no way a team is going to give up a pick and make an offer more appealing then the qualifying offer. Not for a 33 year old set-up man.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply
They are all guesses. Pick your own numbers. Your guess is a good or better than mine.

My guesses:

4) 7 m Tillman - SP2

5) 5.5m Gonzalez - SP3

6) 4.5 m Britton - RP1

7) 5.5 m Machado - 3B

9) 1.5 m Flaherty - UIF

What's the story on Arencibia? Don't we just have him on a MiL deal? Why did you have him at $3 mm? I don't see many back-up catchers making in excess of $1 mm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All the bolded ones seem high to me. It is not typical for Arb 2 guys to get double what they got in Arb 1, and I doubt Machado starts at $7 mm in Arb 1. Trout is getting $6.1 mm this year; Harper is getting $5 mm next year. Put it this way, if those guys get the salaries you've projected, that will be great news for us, because it will mean they were outstanding in 2015.

So following what you are saying then here is twice the agreed upon 2015 salary or the mid point of the arbitration numbers. Arencibia made 1.8m last year. If he is promotion to the majors at any time this year be probably make at least that this year. He may be a 5 year guy next year depending on how much time he spends in the minors. I lowered Manny's salary based on your suggestion.

How do these look?

Tillman at 8.7M

Gonzalez 6.4

Britton 6.4

Machado 5

Arencibia 3.6

Flaherty 2.4

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Oday pitches lights out.

If Angelos continues to allow the payroll to rise as it has been each year.

Yes' date=' I would offer it and if he takes it, [b']they say there is no such thing as a bad one year contract[/b].

There's an exception to every rule. That would be an utter waste of $8-10 mm at least.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So following what you are saying then here is twice the agreed upon 2015 salary or the mid point of the arbitration numbers. Arencibia made 1.8m last year. If he is promotion to the majors at any time this year be probably make at least that this year. He may be a 5 year guy next year depending on how much time he spends in the minors. I lowered Manny's salary based on your suggestion.

How do these look?

Tillman at 8.7M

Gonzalez 6.4

Britton 6.4

Machado 5

Arencibia 3.6

Flaherty 2.4

I think you misinterpreted what I said: "it is not typical for Arb 2 guys to get double what they got in Arb 1." It's usually more like a 40-75% raise, depending on performance. (Chris Davis was an exception after his near-MVP season.)

On Manny, the reason I said $5.5 mm is because that's what Wieters got as an Arb 1, and I don't see Manny getting less.

I'm losing you on Arencibia, unless he somehow becomes our starting catcher. He's not going to make more than $1 mm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you misinterpreted what I said: "it is not typical for Arb 2 guys to get double what they got in Arb 1." It's usually more like a 40-75% raise, depending on performance. (Chris Davis was an exception after his near-MVP season.)

On Manny, the reason I said $5.5 mm is because that's what Wieters got as an Arb 1, and I don't see Manny getting less.

I'm losing you on Arencibia, unless he somehow becomes our starting catcher. He's not going to make more than $1 mm.

Ok I will go for a 50% increase.

If Wieters is gone in 2016, I could he Joseph and Arencibia sharing time at catcher the way Joseph and Hundley did last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2016 Payroll Estimate (Adjusted by Frobby)

1) 16.3m Jones - CF

2) 13m Jimenez - SP1

3) 12.5m Hardy - SS

4) 7m Tillman - SP2

5) 5.5m Machado - 3B

6) 5.5m Gonzalez - SP3

7) 4.5m Britton - RP1

8) 2.7m Arencibia - C (shared)

8) 2.4m Yoon - RP (starts in the minors)

9) 1.5m Flaherty - UIF

10) 1.5m Vladimir Guerrero (deferred compensation)

11) .53m Gausman - SP4

12) .53m McFarland - RP2

13) .52m Schoop - 2B

14) .52m Joseph - C (shared)

15) .52m Brach - RP3

16) .52m Lough - OF

17) .52m Garcia - RP4

18) .51m Bundy - SP5

19) .51m Hassan - OF/DH

20) .51m Walker - DH

21) .51m Alvarez - RF

22) .51m Wright - RP5

23) .51m T Berry - RP6

Sub Total 78.18m of earned salary

Minus 2.25m deferred from Jimenez

Minus 2m deferred from Hardy(best guess)

Total 75.93m salaries to be paid in 2016

130m-75.93 = 54.07m

It has been reported the 6.5M of Hardy's contract is deferred but no word yet on how it is distributed of the contract term.

Signing bonuses are shown in the year they are paid. Performance bonuses are not included.

Need a 1B, LF, set-up man

Last edited by wildcard; Today at 08:46 AM

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know very few agree and part of me is questioning my a sanity for suggesting it but I think Davis is an extension candidate as long as he doesn't have a monster season. I also think if Bundy makes big strides then Tillman could be a trade chip for some young OF or 2B is Schoop is as bad as last year. There are a lot of pitching options in FA next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is no chance of buying low on Wieters, IMO. Maybe on Chris Davis but Boras is the agent for both so don't expect anything you consider a bargain.

I would be more inclined to extending Pearce, De Aza, and those types of players to 3/15, 3/18 types of contracts. Pearce has never had any financial security before. I think the O's offered 2.4M and he wants 5.5M. He could easily lose that case. Offer him some security. Even if Pearce isn't close to what he was last year he still offers a good RH platoon bat and versatility. The upside for the O's is that he proves himself to be a full time player and they have a bargain for the next 3 years in the OF or at 1B when Davis leaves.

Totally agree. I think both of those guys would love to have a three year deal in their pocket. I do agree that Boras probably wouldn't let Matt or Chris sign a long term deal, but I would try. If I'm Matt, I would sign a one year extention as he probably isn't going to be able to get his value up high enough this year on a multi year deal. That would also give the O's the opportunity to see the progress of Ohlman and Sisco.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • There probably was no "right" choice and absolutely no "absolutely right choice" I was on record wanting to choose Abrahms and my logic was simple, a 1:1 is a chance to pick a HOF type talent A college catcher was a safe pick and Adley is having a nice career but he is clearly not a MVP/HOF type player.
    • Agreed, Akin is pitching too well to be optioned until there’s no other choices. Tate should certainly be optioned before him. The only reason I could see Akin needing to be optioned is if BOTH Means and Irvin end up in the pen (with Bradish, Kremer and Suárez starting). That’s possibly the best 5 SP right now if they believe Suárez > Means/Irvin. In which case you really can’t have 5 lefty RP and only one RHP to go with Kimbrel and Cano. Otherwise, they should carry 4 lefty RP (with one of Means/Irvin as the long man) before optioning Akin. 
    • The answer to the question is obviously no. Now if the question was would Gunnar have been worthy #1 pick the answer seems obvious that he would have been.    But taking him where he went allowed the Orioles to maximize their draft which is what every team hopes to do.    You can argue whether Adley was the right pick but if Gunnar went first there is no way the two picks work as well for Baltimore. 
    • 1080i video is redrawn a half frame (field) at 60 times per second.  Progressive footage like 1080p is 30 whole frames per second but often converted to interlaced format for transmission. If you are doing this on an ongoing basis, here's a suggestion: download the free version of one of the numerous non-linear editors out there like Avid or DaVinci Resolve and throw the clip on a timeline for your measurement.  Manually clicking through hundreds of frames seems like it would be needlessly cumbersome not to mention slow.  
    • This. I don’t get the Akin going down talk (even though it seems more based off his option remaining than performance). Right now Akin is arguably our 4th most trusted reliever (can argue with Webb) based off his usage and his peripherals are clearly in the top 4 with Cano, Kimbrel, and Coulombe. He might not be a setup guy but he’s a solid piece to have in the middle innings.   Akin’s K-BB% is nearly double that of Baumann’s in both of their careers as relievers. He K’s more, walks less, and gets more chases and whiffs.   Keeping Baumann over Akin even for a week isn’t a move that winning teams make. Not to trash him, but Baumann is just not good, so who cares if he gets claimed? He’s not trusted at this point late in close games unless the bullpen is overused, so if you lose him and need a replacement later in the year you have Heasley, Charles, and Tate (if he gets optioned). Then you also have Wells who should be a bullpen guy when he comes back. Having the flexibility is good but keeping one of your worst relievers just because he doesn’t have an option doesn’t seem like a good way to solve a log jam. 
    • Witt had hit tool questions on draft day, and Abrams was much less of a sure thing than Adley. Based on information known at the time, we absolutely made the right choice with Adley.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...