Jump to content

vs. RED SOX, 4/18


OFFNY

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 679
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Nope. I have made the case that we should have a rule that prohibits predicting doom like the NYYFans game threads do, but it has fallen on deaf ears.

Here is the pertinent part of NYYFans game thread rules:

Negative predictions under normal circumstances will NOT be allowed in the Game Threads this year. Any such predictions will result in a warning, followed by a GT suspension for the second offense.

A negative prediction is defined as follows: "Any post in which a poster specifically says that something bad for the Yankees will happen, or specifically says that something good for the Yankees will not happen."

Some examples of posts that would be considered negative predictions:

Yankees up 4-2 on the Mariners, Bottom 8, Farnsworth coming in: “Great, here’s Farnsworth. 5-4 Mariners.”

Yankees down 2-1, Man on first, A-rod up, “Chances of A-rod getting a big hit here: 0%”

Yanks up 4-3 against the Red Sox, Man on first, Ortiz up: “homer coming up here,” or “What are the chances he doesn’t hit a homer here?” or "I'm feeling 5-4 Sox"

First inning, 0-0, the Indians hit a 3 run homer: “Game over,” or, “Well, there’s always tomorrow,” or, "We have no chance to win this game."

A few important things to remember about the above examples:

They apply to ALL PLAYERS and ALL SITUATIONS.

If one of your negative predictions comes true, IT DOES NOT MEAN THAT IT WAS NOT A NEGATIVE PREDICTION. YOU CAN STILL BE WARNED/SUSPENDED FOR IT EVEN IF YOU SAY ORTIZ WILL HOMER AND HE DOES.

The above sample posts are not, and were not meant to be, an exhaustive list of what constitutes a negative prediction by any means. If you think it’s a negative prediction, it probably is, so say it in a different way. If you’d like further clarification on a specific post that you were thinking of making, feel free to send it to one of the GT Mods (Soriambi, Socal Pinstriper, Tifoso, Bub, or IntangiblesRule) and we’ll let you know if it’s okay.

We can not emphasize number two enough, but all three of the above rules are important to remember.

Some examples of posts that would NOT be against our negative prediction rule:

Yankees up 4-2 on the Mariners, Bottom 8, Farnsworth coming in: “No, Joe; not Farnsworth,” or, “I really don’t have a good feeling about this based on how Farns is pitching”

Yanks up 4-3 against the Red Sox, Man on first, Ortiz up: “This is scary.”

First inning, 0-0, the Indians hit a 3 run homer: “Well, that’s quite a hole to climb out of early.”

2-1 Yanks in the 2nd, 0 outs, Yankee bunts another Yankee to second: "I don't like the bunt at all there; that could cost us a few runs."

______________________________________________________

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bordick really dogging Davis on that IF hit.

It is a tough adjustment for a first baseman not to break toward a ball that he can get to. The bottom line is that the pitcher ought to make it to first before the hitter every time.

Might want to slide there Manny.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • How about..." we wont win another game in the regular season"?
    • i still like that winning your division matters, at least a little bit.  So I think there's a happy medium between how unbalanced it was, and what you are suggesting.  13 games vs each division team feels right to me, but there are going to be years where that skews the WC thing a bit, because there's always one really bad team, it seems, somewhere (not always as bad as the ChiSox, of course).  I'm not sure how else to further balance it.  Maybe cut back on the NL stuff a bit and play more games against your non-divisional conference rivals so at least there's more head to head to base the WC on.
    • Apparently this post of mine from one year ago killed this thread, as it was the last before today's bump.  In re-reading that, I am reminded (by a past version of myself, LOL) of why I love this sport.  It was actually a bit invigorating reading that back to myself.  LETS GO BIRDS!
    • I've found the older I get, the less interest I have in watching my teams lose. It's a waste of time so I find something else to do. Watching my team lose is not enjoyable so I'd rather do something I'd enjoy. It's not like I'm that old either, just 47. I get a lot more enjoyment out of watching good games with other teams, to be honest. Watching the Bills in the first half last night was fun. The Redskins/Bengals game was fun to watch. Man City and Arsenal on Sunday was great. The Chiefs/Falcons game was a good game. There were a few decent college football games this last weekend as well. I'll watch the game to start tonight and if the O's are down 3-0 after the 1st inning, I'll find something else to do, probably watch some of the other MLB games that have playoff implications.
    • It will be interesting to see if there is any carry over from the HBP's culminating in Heston's beaning.  Hate to say it but that's around when the .500 play started, now much worse.  I did like the way HK stared down Holmes after being hit-I think this series will mean a little more to him.
    • It’s O’s and Yanks. Good guys versus bad guys. Baby Birds up against the Evil Empire — and another trip to the post-season is in the cards. I’ve been cheering for the O’s and very specifically against the Yanks going on six decades, and I’m getting good at it. So, yeah. I’m fired up. Now ask me about hopes and dreams. I don’t think this Orioles team is going to make a run to WS this year.  They have scuffled, they have failed — but I’m reminded, even in the platinum age of data — baseball is still a game of failure.  And man, runners in scoring position over the last week, I’m not sure I want to know that number. They’re still my guys. As long as they’re in it, so am I.
    • Let's go Tampa! Actually, I'm fired up for the offseason.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...