Jump to content

March 6th Vs. Minnesota


Tank

Recommended Posts

Olehippi, do we have to be in midseason form to pitch two lousy innings?

Look at the bullpen and we have a lot of guys like that: Sarfate, McGrory, Sherrill, Hoey, Bradford and Walker...all of these guys are considered situational or closer/setup types who only pitch one frame. We had too much of that last year, and maybe that's one reason the bullpen was so bad. A starter goes out early and you need to pitch the whole staff to get thru 9 innings forcryinoutloud! A couple of bad games in a row and you have a situation with a lot guys coming in 2 and 3 days in a row and it's a disaster.

Just to pitch for two innings, maybe not. But to pitch effectively for two innings, I would probably say "yes."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 212
  • Created
  • Last Reply
And we also have potential multi-inning players in Burress, Leicester, Johnson, Novoa. If we lose this game 30-3 and we use 27 pitchers to each get one out, it means nothing other than that's how Trembley wanted to use people today.

Leicester and Burress are cannon fodder , JJohnson hasn't pitched more than a couple innings at the ML level and hasn't been that great when in the minors, and Novoa is mediocre at best. If you start using them you'll have 30-3 games every 3 or 4 nites. You need at least a couple of guys who can go out there and eat up 2 or 3 innings apiece and get outs, not a bunch of one-inning "specialists" who fols up like an accordian when they go over 15 pitches or so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Love Wieters, but people who thought he might be ready this year are nuts. He has been way overmatched at the plate, so far. I'm sure he'll get there, but he's nowhere near ready to face ML pitchers now.

If he can't hit decently now, I question if he'll really be ready next year

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Saves are about the stupidest thing to base reliever pay on.  Ok you probably won't have your worst reliever pitching the 9th, but pitching the 9th w/ a 3 run lead is probably one of the easiest reliever jobs.
    • I'm wondering if Gunnar would be interested in a 8 year/$250 mill extension.  He would still hit free agency at 30.  Also he could have the option of taking player option for 5 years/$200 mill if he had top 5 MVP finish in year 5-8 (is this kind of opion even legal by MLB rules?)
    • Honestly it's been kind of a useless roster spot, so I don't know that they really care about performance. No matter who it is in this roster spot, they won't play a lot so they're not looking for them to make a big offensive impact. 
    • I really like watching Burnes pitch. And yet, I’ve never gone back and forth so much on a possible contract offer for him than any other player. Dude deserves to be paid, I just keep thinking the price tag and years is simply too much. It’s fear of injury and potentially paying another guy well after he stops playing baseball. If the Elias and crew want to make a run at him, I’ll certainly roll with it. I guess we will know more about how deep our pockets actually are after this season.
    • Westburg batting #4 isn't your typical clean up hitter, but he does 2 things well enough that it's probably going to be consistently effective. 1. He has a high average with runners in scoring position. 2. If the 1st 3 batter fail, he'll be good at leading of the 2nd inning. Bonus: He's got some pop in his bat so once in a while he can do what traditional cleanup hitters do. I love how versatile and consistent Jordan Westburg is.
    • I hope we extend Henderson and Adley at the All-Star break this year. Rubenstein can show that the Orioles are sitting at the big boy table now. They are some of the best players in MLB and should be getting paid.       
    • To me, it's more about offensive inconsistency game to game. I don't do the research that many others on here do, I just go off of what I see and feel. And I feel like this offense is very inconsistent and it's an all or nothing approach. There's been back and forths on social media about whether the lack of walks is going to hurt this team long term especially in the post season. In addition to the walks it's the impatience on many nights that drives me crazy. Also, the lack of station to station baseball. Last night, I felt like it was nothing but attack attack attack.. clearly after a couple innings this approach was not working so why not change it up a bit? And also, no one is talking about that after we got Gray out of the game, we didn't do jack **** against their bullpen. The bullpen guys (excluding Hensley) do not have Gray "stuff". So what's the explanation for why we didn't even have a hit after we knocked Gray out? If these trends continue, yes, we may not get swept (because we'll hit enough HRs), but it'll be difficult to rattle off long winning streaks which unless they fall apart due to injury, will make it difficult to keep up with and overtake NY (they just won 7 in a row and like 10 of 13?).
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...