Jump to content

Would you consider putting Britton in the rotation at the start of 2016?


Frobby

Recommended Posts

There's no question that Zach Britton is a dominant reliever, and in that role he's able to thrive using one dominant pitch 90% of the time. As a starter, he wouldn't be able to use that approach.

I'm still a bit tempted to try him as a starter at the beginning of 2016, however. If you look back on is career, he had a pretty nice debut season as a starter, but had shoulder issues in the second half that detracted from his final stats. Those problems persisted the next year, and the following year he had command issues and didn't show any consistency. He worked out with the weighted balls in the winter of 2013-14, and before it was known what his role would be, Brady Anderson predicted we'd see a different Britton in 2014 due to his conditioning. He worked on his command issues with Wallace and Chiti that spring, got put in the bullpen, and the rest is history.

For me, it's not as simple as saying Britton has succeeded because he was moved to the bullpen. He got healthy, he found a workout routine that worked for him, and he learned to command his sinker. He also matured and gained confidence. So, am I sure that he could be an effective starter? No, not really. But I think it might be a good thing to find out. I never joined those folks who wanted to try Jim Johnson as a starter, but I'm much more interested in seeing what Britton could do. Especially with our one lefty starter likely to leave in free agency this winter.

What say you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 142
  • Created
  • Last Reply
There's no question that Zach Britton is a dominant reliever, and in that role he's able to thrive using one dominant pitch 90% of the time. As a starter, he wouldn't be able to use that approach.

I'm still a bit tempted to try him as a starter at the beginning of 2016, however. If you look back on is career, he had a pretty nice debut season as a starter, but had shoulder issues in the second half that detracted from his final stats. Those problems persisted the next year, and the following year he had command issues and didn't show any consistency. He worked out with the weighted balls in the winter of 2013-14, and before it was known what his role would be, Brady Anderson predicted we'd see a different Britton in 2014 due to his conditioning. He worked on his command issues with Wallace and Chiti that spring, got put in the bullpen, and the rest is history.

For me, it's not as simple as saying Britton has succeeded because he was moved to the bullpen. He got healthy, he found a workout routine that worked for him, and he learned to command his sinker. He also matured and gained confidence. So, am I sure that he could be an effective starter? No, not really. But I think it might be a good thing to find out. I never joined those folks who wanted to try Jim Johnson as a starter, but I'm much more interested in seeing what Britton could do. Especially with our one lefty starter likely to leave in free agency this winter.

What say you?

I agree, and I have said it several times on here. It usually is not met by a whole lot of enthusiasm on the board, but I see no reason that Britton could not be a very solid starter. And next year, with Chen likely gone, I think it would be a smart thing to do to at least give Britton a look at the rotation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's no question that Zach Britton is a dominant reliever, and in that role he's able to thrive using one dominant pitch 90% of the time. As a starter, he wouldn't be able to use that approach.

I'm still a bit tempted to try him as a starter at the beginning of 2016, however. If you look back on is career, he had a pretty nice debut season as a starter, had shoulder issues in the second half that detracted from his final stats. Those problems persisted the next year, and the following year he had command issues and didn't show any consistency. He worked out with the weighted balls in the winter of 2013-14, and before it was known what his role would be, Brady Anderson predicted we'd see a different Britton in 2014 due to his conditioning. He worked on his command issues with Wallace and Chiti that spring, got put in the bullpen, and the rest is history.

For me, it's not as simple as saying Britton has succeeded because he was moved to the bullpen. He got healthy, he found a workout routine that worked for him, and he learned to command his sinker. He also matured and gained confidence. So, am I sure that he could be an effective starter? No, not really. But I think it might be a good thing to find out. I never joined those folks who wanted to try Jim Johnson as a starter, but I'm much more interested in seeing what Britton could do. Especially with our one lefty starter likely to leave in free agency this winter.

What say you?[/quote\]. Yeah and while we're at it move Jones to RF and let lough take CF and Manny to SS and Hardy to third.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://mweb.cbssports.com/fantasy/fantasy-baseball/update/25241755/os-not-entertaining-moving-zach-britton-into-rotation-next-season

How much do we think he'll get in the arbitration process? If they decide they have to have a lefty in the rotation, I'd prefer him to McFarland, Matusz, or Berry. I'm not against it. Will we be able to afford him in the bullpen in 2017? I wouldn't be opposed to moving him this offseason, and I think the guy is outstanding.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd consider it, and then wonder what the bleep I was thinking considering it. Relievers might be relatively cheap, but they're still vital. A great pen - as we saw last year - can hide the weaknesses of a very ordinary starting pitching staff.

Let me ask this - Would you be asking this question if the lightbulb hadn't gone on for Jake Arrieta? Remember that Jake is an exception to a ton of rules.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes. It would be a great idea to put a one pitch pitcher who had all kinds of problems commanding his off-speed pitches in the rotation. Zach Britton is the perfect reminder that a pitching coach can make a difference. It took Dave Wallace two seconds to figure out what all of our previous pitching coaches couldn't. Ditch the changeup, cut down on the slider and pound the strike zone with your nasty sinking fastball. And what do you know, it worked. It makes a person wonder how much different Jake Arrieta's time with the Orioles would have gone if Dave Wallace had arrived a year or two sooner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We know Britton is a very good relief pitcher. We know that as a starter he threw 254 innings of a 4.77 ERA. We would be hoping that he would be better than that after two years of pitching exclusively in relief and changing how he pitches and prepares. I would leave him where he is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am in the "If it ain't broke don't mess with it crowd". He is a shut down closer. That is very valuable. I would keep him there for at least next season. When his salary goes passed what the O's want to spend on a closer is a good time to consider him as a starter. That will not be 2016.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am in the "If it ain't broke don't mess with it crowd". He is a shut down closer. That is very valuable. I would keep him there for at least next season. When his salary goes passed what the O's want to spend on a closer is a good time to consider him as a starter. That will not be 2016.

What is the max the Orioles want to spend on a closer? Won't Britton be the most expensive Orioles closer in 2016?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's no question that Zach Britton is a dominant reliever, and in that role he's able to thrive using one dominant pitch 90% of the time. As a starter, he wouldn't be able to use that approach.

I'm still a bit tempted to try him as a starter at the beginning of 2016, however. If you look back on is career, he had a pretty nice debut season as a starter, but had shoulder issues in the second half that detracted from his final stats. Those problems persisted the next year, and the following year he had command issues and didn't show any consistency. He worked out with the weighted balls in the winter of 2013-14, and before it was known what his role would be, Brady Anderson predicted we'd see a different Britton in 2014 due to his conditioning. He worked on his command issues with Wallace and Chiti that spring, got put in the bullpen, and the rest is history.

For me, it's not as simple as saying Britton has succeeded because he was moved to the bullpen. He got healthy, he found a workout routine that worked for him, and he learned to command his sinker. He also matured and gained confidence. So, am I sure that he could be an effective starter? No, not really. But I think it might be a good thing to find out. I never joined those folks who wanted to try Jim Johnson as a starter, but I'm much more interested in seeing what Britton could do. Especially with our one lefty starter likely to leave in free agency this winter.

What say you?

I would rather keep him where he is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Wow. Don't like the sound of that.  It might be Povich time. 
    • Our pets' heads are falling off
    • Dean on IL, right triceps strain.
    • Cedric Mullins has had an above average career and is currently an above replacement level player despite his slump. Stating that he is an average or below average player is not factually accurate. He has been worth 12.8 rWAR in his career to this point, which puts him just outside the top 50 on the Orioles career WAR leader. Dauer and Nieman are tied at 49th with 14.4 WAR (as Orioles). Mullins might not be a superstar but he has been an above average player or good player during his Orioles career. I think anyone saying something to the contrary is allowing the current slump to cloud the view of what has been a good career to this point.
    • Means has been worth 10.3 rWAR over 401 career IP.  He put up a 4.4 in 2019, 1.0 in the Covid 2020 season and 3.6 in 2021, his seasons where he did not miss significant time due to injury.  Mullins has not been good since last July for sure, but from 2021-2023 he put up 12.7 rWAR averaging about 4.2 per season.   So, I'm not sure you know what the word "average" means.  
    • There’s already an exception for infield fly rule when a runner is unintentionally hit by batted ball when in contact with a base.    The rule would be for an infield fly, if there is interference and contact was unintentional and the interference did not impede the fielder’s ability to make a play (e.g., there was no reasonable chance to double up runner(s) before they retouched, the fielder wasn’t disadvantaged on a tag up) then the batter is out, the ball is dead, and the runners return to their original bases. Should this be limited to infield fly rule? How would people feel if the same play and call happened yesterday without a runner on first?
    • Man, the Mets one is terrible.  Is that a female gender symbol on Hershiser?   Compared to some of the City Connects I've seen, I don't mind the Rockies and Giants jerseys.   The Mariners jersey is as bad as I remember it.  
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...