Jump to content

Heyward May Have Crashed the OF Market


Camden_yardbird

Recommended Posts

And that's good for the Orioles.

If Heyward really just took an 8 year deal worth less than $185 million after being projected for $200 million plus he may have deflated an OF market with plenty of supply. That could be good for the Orioles who may look to add two of:

Span, Fowler, Jackson, Venable, Upton, and Parra.

I would be really disappointed at this point if the corner outfield was comprised of Reimold, Rickard, Hoes or Alvarez. I'm not saying those players will be cheap, but I think you could see them go for upto 10% less than where they were projected.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 181
  • Created
  • Last Reply
And that's good for the Orioles.

If Heyward really just took an 8 year deal worth less than $185 million after being projected for $200 million plus he may have deflated an OF market with plenty of supply. That could be good for the Orioles who may look to add two of:

Span, Fowler, Jackson, Venable, Upton, and Parra.

I would be really disappointed at this point if the corner outfield was comprised of Reimold, Rickard, Hoes or Alvarez. I'm not saying those players will be cheap, but I think you could see them go for upto 10% less than where they were projected.

Two Opt outs 184. Eight years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone else a little bummed that, at that price, the O's weren't involved? I mean who knows, he may have had no interest in the AL or Baltimore, but man I like him at 8/184 a lot more than CD at 7/150.

Not even a little. I don't think Heyward is worth anywhere close to that number

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">heyward obviously went to school on ellsbury. jacoby 22M, jason 23M. statistically similar (.784 ops for JH, .768 JE)</p>— Jon Heyman (@JonHeymanCBS) <a href="

">December 11, 2015</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not even a little. I don't think Heyward is worth anywhere close to that number

Is that because you just don't value defensive stats as much? If so, fair enough. But I think at 26, there's even plenty of time for him to figure things out at the plate even more, and become a significant offensive threat as well. Left handed too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone else a little bummed that, at that price, the O's weren't involved? I mean who knows, he may have had no interest in the AL or Baltimore, but man I like him at 8/184 a lot more than CD at 7/150.

Nope. Not at all.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">MLB manager to Tom Verducci about Jason Heyward: "I just don't see it." <a href="https://t.co/DAxkNjntj4">https://t.co/DAxkNjntj4</a> <a href="https://t.co/38OBJX6gp4">pic.twitter.com/38OBJX6gp4</a></p>— Sports Illustrated (@SInow) <a href="

">December 11, 2015</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<iframe title="Twitter Tweet" class="twitter-tweet twitter-tweet-rendered" id="twitter-widget-0" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" allowfullscreen="true" style="padding: 0px; border: currentColor; border-image: none; width: 100%; height: 183.26px; margin-top: 10px; margin-bottom: 10px; display: block; visibility: visible; position: static; min-width: 220px; max-width: 500px;" allowtransparency="true" data-tweet-id="675402304145764352"></iframe>

<script src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8" async=""></script>

If you discount the mammoth difference between a 26-year-old and a 30 or 31-year-old. Heyward could reasonably be expected to decline very little for the next 3, 4, 5 years while Ellsbury was expected to be in decline from day one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I can't imagine they have any expectation of Mateo going back to being a regular. If he's going on his annual hot streak, then it's smart to ride him until he gasses out, then shift him back to his reserve role. Holliday is taking that full-time spot soon enough. 
    • Urias has a career 103 OPS+. Had two hits and a walk today plus another squared up ball for an out. I feel like Urias is a bit of a forgotten man, but he is a very solid defender and an average bat. That's probably not good enough for us but that is because we are spoiled with plus guys at basically every position. I agree on Westburg though, if Mayo doesn't end up with 3B, Westburg is adequate there and so far his bat can play for a corner IF.  Hitting on Westburg and Gunnar the way we have really pushes our system over the top. These are guys we weren't necessarily counting on but they are turning into bona fide stars. Only question is how to find room for them all. Westburg 3B makes Mayo the heir apparent at 1B. Somehow he needs to push Mountcastle but he's not a FA until 2027. Maybe he takes Santander's spot and Kjerstad keeps waiting. 
    • Interesting.  You know Gunnar and De La Cruz are the same age, yet Gunnar's put up 9.4 career WAR to poor Elly's 2.7.  If anyone was overrated during the last series it was Nick Lodolo.
    • I wondered about that too.  Maybe he'll take his turn on the IL when Grayson is ready to return.  
    • It’s silly to be judging Bradfield at this stage.  I don’t know if he’ll be good or not, but I know you need to give him a couple of months at least before you have any clue.
    • Anyone else notice Kremer shaking his hand or fingers the last couple games and looking like he’s in pain?  I’m surprised Ben and Kevin didn’t pick up on it today.  It looked obvious to me.
    • Povich is a starter. It makes no sense to bring him up and put him in Baumann’s role. Especially not in a short term situation when he’s pitching so well starting in Norfolk.    also - it kind of feels like Baumann is just a placeholder. When wells and/or Grayson come back, there isn’t another logical move other than maybe option akin, who has pitched dramatically better than Baumann. But I can’t imagine Baumann surviving both wells and Grayson coming back without another injury.    I don’t think Elias is doing anything crazy other than holding onto assets with value until it’s necessary to let them go. Is Tate probably better in the long term? Yeah. But he’s also coming off a year long injury and they don’t want to overuse him. Let them use his option for the flexibility, manage his innings, let Baumann either prove he can rediscover early 2023 form or get dfa’d in the coming weeks while eating whatever innings we need him to. Not like he’s costing us games at the moment.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...