Can't DFA or "Temporarily Inactive" Injured Players on the 40 man roster

[weams]

DFA and the temporarily inactive status was improper, because you can't DFA injured players.

http://mlb.nbcsports.com/2015/08/31/blue-jays-gm-alex-anthopoulos-accuses-steve-tolleson-of-quitting-on-his-team/

http://www.thecubreporter.com/book/export/html/3506

[wildcard]

http://mlb.nbcsports.com/2015/08/31/blue-jays-gm-alex-anthopoulos-accuses-steve-tolleson-of-quitting-on-his-team/

http://www.thecubreporter.com/book/export/html/3506

No teams DL injured players. Like the O's will probably do with Paredes. But when he comes off the DL he is probably DFA'd.

[weams]

No teams DL injured players. Like the O's will probably do with Paredes. But when he comes off the DL he is probably DFA'd.

Absolutely. Unlike what Toronto tried to do with Tolleson. You activated them and then DFA them. Once they are completely healthy and have completed their rehab assignments.

[weams]

No teams DL injured players. Like the O's will probably do with Paredes. But when he comes off the DL he is probably DFA'd.

And I think you meant DFA. And in this case the example used is what Toronto did.