Jump to content

2016 5th Round - Alexis Torres - SS - Colegio Angel David HS


Recommended Posts

A REAL shortstop.

6'0" 183lbs DOB: 12/12/97

“Alexis Torres stands out as perhaps the most talented defensive shortstop in the 2016 high school class and leads a very talented overall group of Puerto Rican prospects. He’s a 6.7 runner with a very quick first step to the ball defensively and has the athletic grace and balance – along with a rifle throwing arm – top shortstop prospects always have.”

2015 PG A-A Classic Official Program

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/4I7ws0IXt5E" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A REAL shortstop.

6'0" 183lbs DOB: 12/12/97

“Alexis Torres stands out as perhaps the most talented defensive shortstop in the 2016 high school class and leads a very talented overall group of Puerto Rican prospects. He’s a 6.7 runner with a very quick first step to the ball defensively and has the athletic grace and balance – along with a rifle throwing arm – top shortstop prospects always have.”

2015 PG A-A Classic Official Program

Other than the kid that popped for PEDs I assume.

Can always use a real defensive shortstop in the system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our system can really use an athletic SS who can defend. I think we are all assuming Mountcastle moves off SS eventually, and Marin hasn't panned out.

The thing about Marin is other than Sisco he's the only other HS bat we've gotten to AA this year. Really just those HS catchers we took a few drafts ago are looking good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Ryan Howard and Connor Justus going back to back. Dearth of college SS didn't push them up the board, going where we rated them.</p>— JJ Cooper (@jjcoop36) <a href="

">June 10, 2016</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quick take -- kid looks like he can really play shortstop, and numbers suggest he can run pretty well also. Not in love with the swing mechanics, and way too many ground balls in those BP videos for me to be crazy about the bat at this point. We'll see how he goes. Glove is a carrying tool, but he'll need to hit to be anything. For a fifth-round pick, I don't mind drafting for positional certainty and hoping the bat pans out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quick take -- kid looks like he can really play shortstop, and numbers suggest he can run pretty well also. Not in love with the swing mechanics, and way too many ground balls in those BP videos for me to be crazy about the bat at this point. We'll see how he goes. Glove is a carrying tool, but he'll need to hit to be anything. For a fifth-round pick, I don't mind drafting for positional certainty and hoping the bat pans out.

If nothing else he should be a good organizational player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • I’m not saying we can’t trade for Scott. Or that we shouldn’t trade for someone. More that we basically already have one reliever we don’t have to trade for. But a guy who will likely have a relatively high whip due to command issues but have a well above average k rate… I also just don’t love rentals in general. Hit or miss as to whether they perform well anyway (hey jack flaherty) and then it’s gone. If you don’t win that year it’s all for nothing. For the right cost I’m okay with it, but I don’t want to give up a major prospect for a rental unless it’s the piece that puts us over the top 
    • They are not in a rebuild. And I don't want to waste time imagining that the team is bad and trading our best young players. As a matter of fact, I hope we don't have to do that for years to come. I envision adding good players not how can we get rid of the good ones that we have. I have waited my whole life to finally have a team this good. I don't mind at all trading good prospects. And have no delusional expectations that we can get value without surrendering value. Nor am I in love with the notion that we have to have a cheap, homegrown team. As a matter of fact, I want and expect the org to spend much more money on payroll than it is doing currently. Lastly, what happened with Gausman is in the past and under a totally different administration (ownership + front office). We were selling then. We are buying now.
    • Is there a reason it should be? He’s still walking 5.5+ batters per 9. He’s still got things he can work on. No rush to get him up unless it’s as a reliever down the stretch or a spot start. 
    • I mean Tanner Scott at least has a Major League track record. How much do you think Scott will really cost? Also, we have more position players and prospects that we could ever use. I understand maybe not wanting Scott, but I don't understand the logic of not wanting surrender any prospects (even some good ones). We almost have to at some point. Otherwise, you have 25 year old top level prospects like Kjerstad, who is in his prime now and killing it at AAA but has no place on the Big League roster. Stowers is even older and has contributed relatively nothing to the Orioles and is now age 26.
    • Way to avoid the question.  If the O's were in rebuild mode and had Gray Rod in the exact position he is now, what kind of prospect package would you want?  Fans here are notorious for not wanting to give up any good prospects for other team's best players but then want the world for their own less than perfect players.  When Gausman was about to be traded here (way less an impressive pitcher than Gray Rod is now), posters here were convinced that the O's would get 3 top 100 prospects for him.  The O's got none 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...