Jump to content

Wall Street Journal: Slowest MLB team in 50 years


fansince79

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 72
  • Created
  • Last Reply

We are a really slow team. There is not one player on our current roster that I would classify as having plus speed and about half the team is solidly below average in the speed category.

Reimold and Jones used to have plus speed, but they are average at this point in their careers. Kim gets up the line faster than Jones now....that's how much speed that guy has lost.

Built for power. Live and die by it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

By the way, BB-ref has us at +1 in Baserunning Runs, 7th in the AL. That's not necessarily a measure of speed, but it does indicate that lack of speed really hasn't cost us much offensively. The White Sox, who have 51 stolen bases, are last in the league in Baserunning Runs, at -11.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

By the way, BB-ref has us at +1 in Baserunning Runs, 7th in the AL. That's not necessarily a measure of speed, but it does indicate that lack of speed really hasn't cost us much offensively. The White Sox, who have 51 stolen bases, are last in the league in Baserunning Runs, at -11.

Those pesky fleas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

By the way, BB-ref has us at +1 in Baserunning Runs, 7th in the AL. That's not necessarily a measure of speed, but it does indicate that lack of speed really hasn't cost us much offensively. The White Sox, who have 51 stolen bases, are last in the league in Baserunning Runs, at -11.

Just to add on to this:

Fangraphs has the Orioles as the tenth best team in their baserunning (BsR) component. They may be slow but at least they aren't stupid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If triples and stolen bases aren't an indication of speed, what's stats ARE an indication of speed?

Picking up two bases on singles, three bases on doubles. Stretching singles into doubles. Getting to first fast enough to prevent double plays. The Orioles are in fact so good at these things that both B-R and Fangraphs considers them an above average running team. Just because the O's don't have a few players who've deluded themselves and their managers into thinking they're Olympic sprinters (they mention triples but what about outs made stretching a double that couldn't be stretched? they mention bags but what about times getting caught?) that doesn't mean they're "the slowest team in 50 years". They have a few real slow guys and a bunch of average guys who run hard and don't try to get fancy. Nothing noteworthy about it.

Funny thing is we now have all this StatCast data that literally quantifies how fast players run and WSJ completely ignores it. But those numbers are probably too boring to get a sensationalist clickbait title so why would they.

Who reads WSJ for baseball analysis anyway?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Picking up two bases on singles, three bases on doubles. Stretching singles into doubles. Getting to first fast enough to prevent double plays. The Orioles are in fact so good at these things that both B-R and Fangraphs considers them an above average running team. Just because the O's don't have a few players who've deluded themselves and their managers into thinking they're Olympic sprinters (they mention triples but what about outs made stretching a double that couldn't be stretched? they mention bags but what about times getting caught?) that doesn't mean they're "the slowest team in 50 years". They have a few real slow guys and a bunch of average guys who run hard and don't try to get fancy. Nothing noteworthy about it.

Funny thing is we now have all this StatCast data that literally quantifies how fast players run and WSJ completely ignores it. But those numbers are probably too boring to get a sensationalist clickbait title so why would they.

Who reads WSJ for baseball analysis anyway?

So going first to third on a single is a sign of speed and so is scoring from first on a double but going from home to third on a ball in the gap or rattling around in the corner isn't?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everyone seems to be arguing that the Orioles are not the slowest team, but I think it's more fun if they are the slowest team. I think we should root for no stolen bases and no triples the rest of the year and lobby for 40 yard dashes before every new series. I think the Orioles may be the slowest team in the majors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • What you want is perfectly reasonable.  But you seem entirely to focused on money.  The team needs to work to improve.  I don't care what it costs, you shouldn't either.  They are going to spend money and payroll will be higher next year and the year after that.  We need them to make improvements and some of that is rightfully going to come from within and not cost much. The improvements that are needed are going to cost too, I'm not saying they wont.  But ownership and the GM should simply work in tandem to make sure the team has what it needs.  I am not really concerned about how much that costs because it should be able to be done without jumping this particular team into say top ten in payroll.
    • This is the right approach. the orioles should be spending more money and I believe they will, but I expect it to be measured with less risk (ie we won’t be handing out a Hader type deal or a  long term contract to Santander IMO) improving on some of the obvious weaknesses certainly makes sense.    1x SP: Burnes, Fried, Buehler 1x RH OF/DH: Martinez, O’Neill, Profar 1x 1B: (wishlist) Alonso, Walker
    • Interesting. I had forgotten that they signed him and then got him in the pitching lab in the offseason. Since September is prior to the end of the season, I would take "two year contract" to mean September '23 is Year 1, and then '24 is Year 2.  That is a cool article. Very encouraging how closely they are following the KBO. 
    • I think most teams would want to have an MVP candidate at quarterback.   Most of the time this will mean that he is better than the guy they currently have.  That's why. My quote was not taking salary into account.  If you take his current salary into account I think you are still talking about a majority of the NFL teams that would take him right now.  If the salary is an issue you find a way to make it work.  I'm starting to come around to the idea that the salary cap is kinda fake in a way after I keep seeing teams do stuff like adding void years other trickery to get the guys they want.
    • Well I sort of disagree here. You said guys have been bad to questionable. I think that’s wrong. I just think a few guys have been awful and that has really hurt us. I would absolutely give Washington more time. Brade and Kane are well liked but doubtful they want to play them much right now. A trade should be considered if things don’t improve.
    • Yeah, I'd rather keep him over Soto.  I mean Soto can't start.  Yes Soto was dominant at times out of the bullpen but he was also gasoline on a fire out of the bullpen.  I would rather pay Suarez $4 or 5 million, knowing he can start or pitch in the bullpen than Soto, knowing he can only start and is liable to melt down when needed most.  
    • It is funny how much Hays (the pre-2024 version anyway) matches the type of player they'll likely look for. I doubt that reunion happens though. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...