Jump to content

Need to take it to the ChiSox this weekend


ChuckS

Recommended Posts

For some reason we go into a funk on the road.We are the only winning team in the majors with a losing road record and its not a small sample size.We are not hitting well, especially Davis. We'd better pick it up on this road series or we will quickly be out of the hunt.Im very worried about this road series....all 10 games.

I presume that you mean we are the only division leaders with a sub .500 record on the road, because otherwise your statement is flat out wrong. The NYY, Tigers, Rangers, Astros, Mariners, Pirates, Dodgers, and Rockies are all .500 or better overall but .500 or worse on the road. This is not just an Orioles problem, and between the other two teams chasing us in the division, Boston isn't great on the road either and they have a ton of road games left.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 32
  • Created
  • Last Reply
It really doesn't matter who's pitching against us, if we have the same thought process and mentality at the plate, the results will be similar. The inability to do the small things, go the opposite way, move runners along, take pitches, situational hitting.....Theresa reason why we haven't scored more than 6 runs in a game in Almost 6 weeks.

Oh good grief. The O's took two of three from the Rangers. The team is in first

place. I don't think the team is as bad as you believe. JIMO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It really doesn't matter who's pitching against us, if we have the same thought process and mentality at the plate, the results will be similar. The inability to do the small things, go the opposite way, move runners along, take pitches, situational hitting.....Theresa reason why we haven't scored more than 6 runs in a game in Almost 6 weeks.
Oh good grief. The O's took two of three from the Rangers. The team is in first

place. I don't think the team is as bad as you believe. JIMO

More importantly, who is Theresa and how does she play into the O's scoring???? ;-) :-P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

O's team total is over 4.5 runs -150. O's are -130 to win the series

For those who care about this type of thing...

The "under" for both teams have hit in every game since 7/8 except for 2. Even Vegas can't figure out our offense. Also we are a streaky team with W/L's. Look here,

http://www.scoresandodds.com/statfeed/statfeed.php?page=mlb/mlbteam&teamid=BALTIMORE&season=2016&view=1&show=2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

O's team total is over 4.5 runs -150. O's are -130 to win the series

I like that series price. We have a significant pitching edge in Games 2 and 3. Gallardo is a tire fire - but we're no worse than a slight dog tonight as the White Sox lineup is shaky and Miggy is not particularly good himself. I expect 2 out of 3 with tonight being the one most in doubt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For those who care about this type of thing...

The "under" for both teams have hit in every game since 7/8 except for 2. Even Vegas can't figure out our offense. Also we are a streaky team with W/L's. Look here,

http://www.scoresandodds.com/statfeed/statfeed.php?page=mlb/mlbteam&teamid=BALTIMORE&season=2016&view=1&show=2

Oddsmakers in Vegas could care less how many runs the Orioles or anyone else scores. Their goal is to set the line to where they have as close to an equal amount bet on each side as possible. They are actually handicapping the betting, not the sports events.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oddsmakers in Vegas could care less how many runs the Orioles or anyone else scores. Their goal is to set the line to where they have as close to an equal amount bet on each side as possible. They are actually handicapping the betting, not the sports events.

True up to a point - but relatively obscure things like the total in random MLB game in August is only attracting action from gamblers - most of them informed - and a handful of degenerates. This isn't Monday Night Football where most of the handle is casual action and they'll hedge their line a little based on what they think the public will do. Something like an August O's total they are crunching the numbers to get as tight to what they think the total will be as possible and trusting the action will come in balanced on either side of that number. If they miss in the number crunch and the money pours in on one side they'll adjust the line accordingly - but the opening lines are their best shot at it for the most part.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

o

18 OUTS: 8 Groundouts (Including 1 Double Play), 4 Flyouts, 3 Lineouts, 1 Strikeout, 1 Popout

MIGUEL ANGEL GONZALEZ Oo (AUGUST 4th)

IP:l 6

H:;; 10ll(1 Home Run, 1 Double, 8 Singles)

R:l) 4

ER:)3

BB:)0

SO:)1

Pitches: 95 (68 Strikes, 27 Balls)

2016 ERA: 4.09

PITCHES BY INNING

****************

14 (81 Strikes, 61 Balls)

20 (17 Strikes, 31 Balls)

28 (18 Strikes, 10 Balls)

16 (10 Strikes, 61 Balls)

81 (71 Strikes, 11 Balls)

91 (81 Strikes, 11 Balls)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oddsmakers in Vegas could care less how many runs the Orioles or anyone else scores. Their goal is to set the line to where they have as close to an equal amount bet on each side as possible. They are actually handicapping the betting, not the sports events.

While that's true, there's a lot of research that shows that the collective judgment of a large number of people is usually close to correct. For example, put 30 people in a room and have them guess how many M&M's are in a jar. No individual answer is that likely to be close, but the average guess will be pretty damned good. So the mid-point that Vegas is trying to find is a good measure, though not infallible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 down...big win. The add on runs in 8th were huge, and hopefully a sign of offense about to get hot.

Vote 4 Pedro!

Miguel Gonzalez was off his game last night. He was lucky to allow only 4 runs while he was in there. Hopefully we can keep it going against Rondon today.

I

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • What you want is perfectly reasonable.  But you seem entirely to focused on money.  The team needs to work to improve.  I don't care what it costs, you shouldn't either.  They are going to spend money and payroll will be higher next year and the year after that.  We need them to make improvements and some of that is rightfully going to come from within and not cost much. The improvements that are needed are going to cost too, I'm not saying they wont.  But ownership and the GM should simply work in tandem to make sure the team has what it needs.  I am not really concerned about how much that costs because it should be able to be done without jumping this particular team into say top ten in payroll.
    • This is the right approach. the orioles should be spending more money and I believe they will, but I expect it to be measured with less risk (ie we won’t be handing out a Hader type deal or a  long term contract to Santander IMO) improving on some of the obvious weaknesses certainly makes sense.    1x SP: Burnes, Fried, Buehler 1x RH OF/DH: Martinez, O’Neill, Profar 1x 1B: (wishlist) Alonso, Walker
    • Interesting. I had forgotten that they signed him and then got him in the pitching lab in the offseason. Since September is prior to the end of the season, I would take "two year contract" to mean September '23 is Year 1, and then '24 is Year 2.  That is a cool article. Very encouraging how closely they are following the KBO. 
    • I think most teams would want to have an MVP candidate at quarterback.   Most of the time this will mean that he is better than the guy they currently have.  That's why. My quote was not taking salary into account.  If you take his current salary into account I think you are still talking about a majority of the NFL teams that would take him right now.  If the salary is an issue you find a way to make it work.  I'm starting to come around to the idea that the salary cap is kinda fake in a way after I keep seeing teams do stuff like adding void years other trickery to get the guys they want.
    • Well I sort of disagree here. You said guys have been bad to questionable. I think that’s wrong. I just think a few guys have been awful and that has really hurt us. I would absolutely give Washington more time. Brade and Kane are well liked but doubtful they want to play them much right now. A trade should be considered if things don’t improve.
    • Yeah, I'd rather keep him over Soto.  I mean Soto can't start.  Yes Soto was dominant at times out of the bullpen but he was also gasoline on a fire out of the bullpen.  I would rather pay Suarez $4 or 5 million, knowing he can start or pitch in the bullpen than Soto, knowing he can only start and is liable to melt down when needed most.  
    • It is funny how much Hays (the pre-2024 version anyway) matches the type of player they'll likely look for. I doubt that reunion happens though. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...