Jump to content

Orioles Acquire Miguel Castro Designate Gunkel


weams

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, Philip said:

The Twins gave Jason Castro 24 million because of his framing. It matters to some people...

Castro is worth a bit more than a win a year (rWAR doesn't include framing) and the going rate for free agent wins is about 8.5M.  Three years 24.5M doesn't seem particularly out of place given his non-framing production. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, esmd said:

I think Castro is a guy who gets less out of more.  The guy has a great arm and nasty stuff, yet always gets lit up.  I dunno if he's in love with himself and thinks he's better than he is, or what.  His underachieving is hugely disappointing.

It's actually quite simple, he doesn't have major league command, and his slider has been downright awful this season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, interloper said:

The regression of Miguel Castro has been weird, especially considering we have the tools to help, you'd think. What's different this year? Why isn't he missing more bats? It's odd. 

I'm not making any conclusions on the new tools/information, but outside of maybe Means, we certainly have not seen them help out very much on this pitching staff.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Tony-OH said:

I'm not making any conclusions on the new tools/information, but outside of maybe Means, we certainly have not seen them help out very much on this pitching staff.

At first I thought this was silly that they needed video to figure this very obvious fact out. But now I'm thinking it's a poorly worded description of the coaches noticing it, and showing Miguel how he needs to fix the issue. At least I hope that's the case, because this was very obvious in early ST to the naked eye. I'm not sure why they let him roll with that armslot so long. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, interloper said:

At first I thought this was silly that they needed video to figure this very obvious fact out. But now I'm thinking it's a poorly worded description of the coaches noticing it, and showing Miguel how he needs to fix the issue. At least I hope that's the case, because this was very obvious in early ST to the naked eye. I'm not sure why they let him roll with that armslot so long. 

It’s an all new coaching staff, but you would have expected them to pickup on it after watching video this past off season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You always hope that people can identify one relatively simple change to "fix" a player. I'm a skeptic, but I also think Castro has some real natural ability, so hopefully he can make mechanical changes to become what I hope he can be. I really like that arm. Unfortunately, I don't love the probabilities. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Throwing 100 MPH isn’t a skill so much as an inborn ability. Lots of folks have unusual abilities, but the skill is in developing it. I don’t know Castro’s problem, nor the solution, but that solution is necessary or he’s another Jason Garcia.

With that in mind, I’d like to send him down and bring someone else up. I don’t know whether the coaches at Norfolk are any better than here( maybe he has access to all of them?) but he’s doing badly enough here, there’s no reason not to call up someone else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

o

 

MIGUEL ANGEL CASTRO

 

(APRIL 26th Through MAY 10th)

 

 

GM: llllllllllllllllll 6

IP: llllllllllllll 7.33

H: lllllllllllllllllllll 5

BB: llllllllllllllllll 2

SO: lllllllllllllllllll 9

ERA: lllllllllllll 0.00

WHIP: llllllllll 0.955

BA: llllllllllllll .192

OBP: llllllllllllllll .241

OPS: lllllllllllllllll .472

 

https://www.baseball-reference.com/players/gl.fcgi?id=castrmi01&t=p&year=2019

 

o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

o

 

Castro has had 4 consecutive scoreless outings.

His overall numbers for the season are still ballooned (5.57 ERA, and 1.423 WHIP.)

 

 

MIGUEL ANGEL CASTRO

 

(MAY 28th Through JUNE 6th)

 

 

GM: llllllllllllllllll 4

IP: lllllllllllllllll  8

H: lllllllllllllllllllll 3

BB: llllllllllllllllll 3

SO: lllllllllllllllllll 7

ERA: lllllllllllll 0.00

WHIP: llllllllll 0.750

BA: llllllllllllll .120

OBP: llllllllllllllll .207

OPS: lllllllllllllllll .407

 

o

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • If thats where he's at 1B or Dh there will be no extension. The bat woud have to be super special. and it's not. we already have like 3 of those Mounty, O'hearn and Mayo
    • The on field product has the talent to win and bring out fans now.  I’m not saying not to spend more money.  Your first paragraph I agree with. The new owner assumes all the “debts” leftover. Ultimately it’s their responsibility to repair it.    They screwed up big time with their pricing. If this team rebounds and gets in the DS the excitement will pick up. Only the last week did they have any momentum after months of losing it. 
    • That’s a very good point, but then you have the question whether you would be willing to give up McDermott plus for erceg, and that’s an easy trade to make. Plus, the athletics need almost everything, they wouldn’t want Hays But we could’ve found something to satisfy them.
    • IMO, this mindset ("new chapter") is part of the problem. We can't act like the past and the terrible relationship that the org had with it's customer base does not matter or have a carryover effect. Whether the org calls itself "new" or not IMO is irrelevant. The issue is whether or not it will operate in enough meaningful different ways. If the org wants more of it's market to be engaged it is going to have to raise the bar to championship expectations and invest more in the on-field product. That would be different from the past and would indeed reflect that something is "new".
    • All of you guys talking about empty seats and an unengaged fanbase - did you not see the post showing over 41K in attendance, more than in MIL or HOU?  Are those fan bases also unengaged or disinterested? This is much ado about absolutely nothing.
    • I think at this point its just semantics regarding what a successful deadline looked like.  Elias upgraded three positions - SP, 2 RP.  Could there have been bigger upgrades?  Sure, at a bigger cost.  I think it was sufficient.  What has killed the team is the hitting.  If this team had hit like its capable of, and Soto, Eflin, and Dominguez all pitched exactly as they have, we'd all be feeling a lot better about the team, and probably lauding Elias for those three pickups and what a great boost they were at the deadline.  But we aren't hitting - at all - and I don't know what he could have done at the deadline to fix that. Already agreed that the draft strategy must evolve. I don't agree it was a bad strategy to do what they did so far, but it does have to evolve, just as the organization as a whole has evolved.  And I think it will.
    • I don't mean this as any kind of personal slight toward you. Please do not take this as such. But people/fans showed how they felt about this team who has been a loser for almost 4 months. And largely continued to hedge (beyond the Eflin addition) at the deadline. I bet you who did not have a bunch of empty seats for their playoff game yesterday .... San Diego. IMO it is because of the effort that they put in to continue to engage the fanbase. You can't sell people on the "homegrown" stars idea and no need to add a lot of outside talent. And then some of those "homegrown stars" who were so hyped flop. And then not extend the ones who turn into stars. That communicates a lack of investment by the org. Now when you add that up in the economy/2024 inflation and combine that with all of the other entertainment choices that people have in 2024; things like this will happen. Empty seats during a playoff game = an unengaged/unexcited fan base. The org has to own much of this.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...