Jump to content

How can your major job to report on O's baseball....


wildcard

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 33
  • Created
  • Last Reply
6 minutes ago, Larry18 said:

Are you sure they used an option in 2015? 

Gausman was optioned twice in 2015 for a total of 26 days.  

http://www.tsn.ca/mlb/player-bio/kevin-gausman/bio

He was eligible for a 4th option in 2016 but it was not used.  The 4th option expires after one year.

From Cot's

  • A player may be eligible for a fourth option year if he has been optioned in three seasons but does not yet have five full seasons of professional experience. A full season is defined as being on an active pro roster for at least 90 days in a season. The 90-day requirement means short-season leagues (New-York Penn, Northwest, Pioneer, Appalachian, Gulf Coast, Arizona Rookie, Dominican and Venezuelan Summer Leagues) do not count as full seasons for the purposes of determining eligibility for a fourth option.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually, just got this from someone in the O's management. 

On whether Gausman has an option still.

"Yes, he has one remaining. He has a 4th option because prior to the commencement of the 2017 season,he had less than 5 seasons at the ML and Mil levels combined."

So maybe, just maybe a guy as connected to the Orioles as Bordick may actually know something about this stuff?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Roster Resource is always on point.  They even know the SP's when they are TBD.  

They say Gausman has an option remaining.  

https://www.rosterresource.com/mlb-baltimore-orioles

This kind of stuff just gets me. I literally go out and get the information directly from the Orioles yet people are still posting stuff like this is still debatable. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My apologies to Mr Bordick and every one else.   I did not interpret the rule correctly.   

Gausman will not have 5 professional seasons in according to the rules until early July.  So he can be optioned until that time.

Thanks Tony.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, wildcard said:

I listen and read these guys for new information about the O's.  When I read stuff like this I just shake my head and wonder how they can be this close to the O's organization and not understand what is going on.

You rely on Mike Bordick for new information about the Orioles?   Really? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Going Underground said:

Fair and balanced. Roch too,

They have very different jobs.    Roch's job is to obtain news about the team and report it accurately.    Bordick's job is to comment on what is happening in games as they are ongoing.     He's not very good at that job, but that's beside the point.    He's the last guy I'd expect to be on top of the nuances of who has options and that sort of trivia.     

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Frobby said:

They have very different jobs.    Roch's job is to obtain news about the team and report it accurately.    Bordick's job is to comment on what is happening in games as they are ongoing.     He's not very good at that job, but that's beside the point.    He's the last guy I'd expect to be on top of the nuances of who has options and that sort of trivia.     

Yet he was right in this case.   Good for Bordick.   And I say that as another person who would really prefer to not listen to him on the broadcast if possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Aglets said:

Yet he was right in this case.   Good for Bordick.   And I say that as another person who would really prefer to not listen to him on the broadcast if possible.

I have heard Bordick on the radio talk about the Orioles. He seems much more honest and witty and knowledgeable.. He goes on to the color broadcaster  side and becomes not very interesting or insightful. Not sure why he changes on TV. Wish he would be like in his interviews on the radio.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, wildcard said:

Gausman was optioned twice in 2015 for a total of 26 days.  

http://www.tsn.ca/mlb/player-bio/kevin-gausman/bio

He was eligible for a 4th option in 2016 but it was not used.  The 4th option expires after one year.

From Cot's

  • A player may be eligible for a fourth option year if he has been optioned in three seasons but does not yet have five full seasons of professional experience. A full season is defined as being on an active pro roster for at least 90 days in a season. The 90-day requirement means short-season leagues (New-York Penn, Northwest, Pioneer, Appalachian, Gulf Coast, Arizona Rookie, Dominican and Venezuelan Summer Leagues) do not count as full seasons for the purposes of determining eligibility for a fourth option.

Is this a new rule under the new CBA?     I've never heard it before.       If this rule had been in effect last year, Bundy would have been eligible to be optioned, correct?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Tony-OH said:

This kind of stuff just gets me. I literally go out and get the information directly from the Orioles yet people are still posting stuff like this is still debatable. 

I'm curious, how is this stuff officially tracked? I assume at the league level there is some sort of database that only teams have access to?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Frobby said:

They have very different jobs.    Roch's job is to obtain news about the team and report it accurately.    Bordick's job is to comment on what is happening in games as they are ongoing.     He's not very good at that job, but that's beside the point.    He's the last guy I'd expect to be on top of the nuances of who has options and that sort of trivia.     

Actually, he's a guy I would trust a lot because of his access to team officials, Buck and the coaching staff. Let's not forget, Bordick is still basically a coach for the organization and although we can spend all day critiquing his announcing style, he' still very much up on what's happening with the club. He may not always come across this way on the telecasts, but he's a smart guy who spends a lot of time around the team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I miss the "Throwin' Swannanoan".......  
    • So what do the Rays do?   Spend a lot of money fixing the roof for the few remaining years that ballpark has left?   Or do like the A's and play in a minor league facility until their new ballpark is built? I wonder if they could work out something with the Yankees to play in Steinbrenner Field.   It is in Tampa and one of the nicer spring training facilities on the Gulf Coast.   The Rays train in Port Charlotte which is (50???) miles south and I don't think the facility is nearly as good.   Steinbrenner FIeld seats over 10K, has luxury boxes, and a very accessible location for Tampa area fans.  
    • Javy Baez has been on 5 playoff teams including a World Series winner and an LCS team.  128 postseason plate appearances. Mark Canha has been on 5 playoff teams and has 54 postseason plate appearances. Gio Urshela has been on 4 playoff teams and in an LCS and has 88 postseason plate appearances. Those 3 guys may not be big postseason contributors right now but that doesn't mean they aren't providing some amount of leadership by example.   They did have 1000 PAs among them this year for the Tigers.
    • Of course the question asked in that article doesn't really directly answer what a lot of people are talking about. No one is saying we want to have a roster full of guys with experience. But some have suggested that have a team almost completely devoid of guys who have had postseason success, might lead to a bunch of young players who lack role models and mentors and leaders who can help them the first time they face the pressure of the postseason, which really is a totally different animal than the 162 game regular season grind. Anecdotally, there are many guys from the 1966 Orioles (which was a pretty young team) who talked about how Frank came in and "taught us how to win". Anecdotally, back in the days of the "Oriole way", players talked about coming into the organization and learning from veterans how to conduct yourself and how to play the game the right way.   It's hard to have that when you have a total gutting/rebuild of a franchise.    Anecdotally, in the book Astroball, which I read quite a few years ago but I think I remember this part, they talked about the front office coming to the realization that they needed to bring in some veteran leadership, and specifically targeting Carlos Beltran for that reason. Maybe the anecdotes are BS.   Maybe guys just make up narratives after something is successful.   But these ARE human beings, not just a sequence of stats and numbers.   It makes sense that, especially with young players who have never dealt with failure much, the pressure of the postseason could become an isssue and it might be nice to have some wise old heads to lean on. We have a core of young players who have basically been eagerly awaited by fans, told that they are the basis of the next winning franchise, and greeted with adulation.   They came into a team that had minimal veteran leadership and no postseason experience.   They are managed by a manager who has been a coach on winning teams but has never managed in the postseason before.   They have hitting coaches who were hired because of their ability to promote a hitting philosophy and modern coaching techniques that the organization believes are optimal, but who have never coached major league players before in any capacity. Our core players are trying to figure out how to be major leaguers with far less guidance than people who have been there, than perhaps any group of young players ever.   They may be getting excellent instruction and swing analysis and data that will help them hit better, but they have no one who has been through the mental and physical and emotional  tribulations of being a young player in the majors and triumphed, to serve as an example as they try to grown into superstars and champions. In previous seasons, before "liftoff", we brought in guys like Frazier and Chirinos specifically to serve as veteran role modeals, and were able to do so because all the MLB pieces weren't in place yet and there were roster spots available.   Now those spots aren't available, and if we bring in someone for veteranosity they are also going to have to be good enough to play on a championship team.   Harder to find those guys of course.   But I wouldn't dismiss the need altogether.
    • It sounds like it was bad but perhaps not as bad as they thought it would be. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...