Jump to content

Is tonight, Kevin Gausman's last start, as an Oriole?


Flacco Machado

Is tonight, Kevin Gausman's last start, as an Oriole?  

77 members have voted

  1. 1. Is tonight, Kevin Gausman's last start, as an Oriole?

    • Yes
      8
    • No
      69

This poll is closed to new votes

  • Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.
  • Poll closed on 07/29/18 at 16:47

Recommended Posts

Just now, connja said:

I know this site loves WAR - I don't understand it all that well, but looks like KG has a 2.0 WAR this year vs. .4 for Archer.  Career numbers are similar.  

rWAR vs. fWAR. Fangraphs thinks Archer is much more valuable than Baseball Reference does. Fangraphs has it at 1.7 to 1.1 in Archer's favor this season. That is a hell of a difference in the two sites.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 46
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Just now, bpilktree67 said:

Since 2014 when Gausman joined the Orioles he has been with more WAR then Archer and  is younger.  The extra year helps archer but numbers are similar over this years and Gausman is two years younger.  If the year both has three years it would be tough call imo maybe facing Gausman because of age.

Check out their fWAR. Archer's ERA is .4 runs lower, his k/rate is better, his k/bb rate is better, his WHIP is better, his h/9 and his HR/9 is better. If you think Archer is going to fall off a cliff and be a liability at age 32, then so be it, but I would disagree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, MurphDogg said:

I would love to take a bet on their future performance on the Archer side if you think they are about equal. Rest of this season, next season, next two seasons, name the terms.

Gausman since being put in as full time rotation in 2016 has a war of  8.1 while Archer is 3.4.  Those numbers show it is not even close between those two lately.  Gausman is 2 years younger as well.  If contracts were equal the numbers show Gausman would be who you go after.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, bpilktree67 said:

Gausman since being put in as full time rotation in 2016 has a war of  8.1 while Archer is 3.4.  Those numbers show it is not even close between those two lately.  Gausman is 2 years younger as well.  If contracts were equal the numbers show Gausman would be who you go after.

I don't know what Baseball Reference WAR numbers see in Gausman but Fangraphs disagrees and so do more traditional ratio stats. Fangraphs has Archer ahead of Gausman in WAR every season from 2016-2018.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, MurphDogg said:

I would love to take a bet on their future performance on the Archer side if you think they are about equal. Rest of this season, next season, next two seasons, name the terms.

I'll take that bet, bWAR (since it's ERA based) over the next 3 seasons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So while we can agree to disagree here, based on the arguments for both sides you could assume they would command similar haul if traded in the next couple days.  Will be interesting to see if Archer goes first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Luke-OH said:

I'll take that bet, bWAR (since it's ERA based) over the next 3 seasons.

Archer has a lower ERA from 2016-18, so I'm not sure why he is getting killed in rWAR. If someone could explain why Archer's rWAR is so much lower, I would really appreciate it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MurphDogg said:

Archer has a lower ERA from 2016-18, so I'm not sure why he is getting killed in rWAR. If someone could explain why Archer's rWAR is so much lower, I would really appreciate it.

Park factors? A 4 ERA in Tampa is not the same thing as a 4 ERA in Baltimore.

I don't think Gausman is better than Archer now but with the aging curve, it's close enough that I'd take the younger guy with the lower effort delivery to produce more value over an extended time period. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, bpilktree67 said:

Does Gausman get a real center fielder in the bet as welll.  Gausman has pitched this year and past  with Adam Jones in center Archer has Kevin Kiermeir in center.  

Although Gausman probably had better infield defense, right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, MurphDogg said:

Although Gausman probably had better infield defense, right?

He had the worst SS in the league this year.  The Orioles have been playing outfields with jones and two first baseman in Trumo and Mancini the last few years.  The Orioles defense has not been good for couple years now.  They have had near the bottom range factor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Luke-OH said:

Park factors? A 4 ERA in Tampa is not the same thing as a 4 ERA in Baltimore.

I don't think Gausman is better than Archer now but with the aging curve, it's close enough that I'd take the younger guy with the lower effort delivery to produce more value over an extended time period. 

4.10 for Archer vs. 4.25 for Gausman since 2016

8.2 rWAR for Gausman vs. 3.7 rWAR for Archer since 2016

Archer has thrown 15 more innings.

Baseball Reference adjusts ERA+ for park factors, by which they have Gausman at 101 and Archer at 99 since 2016. That doesn't seem significant enough for all of that difference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, bpilktree67 said:

He had the worst SS in the league this year.  The Orioles have been playing outfields with jones and two first baseman in Trumo and Mancini the last few years.  The Orioles defense has not been good for couple years now.  They have had near the bottom range factor.

Yeah, the outfield defense has been weak for a few years and the infield defense got a lot worse since Machado moved to short.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, drjohnnyfeva said:

We can only hope that the FO has realized their mistake with not dealing Manny sooner and get this over with whilst we can still get major return.

They can still get a major return in the offseason with 2 years of control, provided Gausman does not collapse in August/September.

My guess is they're focusing on Jones, Brach, Valencia... the expiring contracts before the trade deadline.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Yeah, that's what I was afraid of.  I'm sure Elias will kick the tires.  WS will be asking for package headed by one of Holliday, Mayo or Basallo.  Maybe price will come down in the offseason.
    • Suarez is probably going to have to go back to the pen. We just don’t have enough arms there to make it through the season, especially with having very few relievers who can pitch more than 1 inning. Even though Suarez has been the much better pitcher than Kremer, he gives you no length. He is the basic definition of a “5 and dive” pitcher.  I guess they could try Kremer as a back end reliever given his strike out stuff and penchant for not being able to go through a lineup a third time. However, the downside to that is his susceptibility to the long ball.
    • This is Crochet's first full year back from TJS after 12 IP last year. You'd have to think if you are trading for him, it's not for this year, but next year as he's likely only got a few more starts left him if he's handled responsibly, which he should be, coming back from TJS. He's under control through the 2026 season and there is value in that even though he's arb eligible and will likely get a nice bump in salary.
    • Luzardo screams "flames out in a few years" to me. No thanks, or at least for what he'll cost. Robert has played literally one full season of baseball in his entire life. Again, too much risk and no thanks. Crochet would be a good target, because we get him for 2 1/2 years and is an elite lefty. Given where CHW are, a package with Kjerstad and one of our young pitchers (headlining) makes sense for both teams.  If we are forced to effectively give up on Mullins or Hays (either BC of injury or general suckiness), Taylor Ward does make sense. His name has been tossed around a lot. His splits playing against AL East teams kinda scare me, but he's a RH bat that can play good defensive OF and under team control for a few years and probably won't cost much. As for bullpen arms, this seems like the hardest to predict. CHW doesn't really have anybody pitching well there. The Marlins have our old friend Tanner Scott, but he isn't anything near a sure thing like other experienced closers. Mason Miller will cost too much. Chapman may make sense if DC is out. As a 36 year old rental he won't cost as much, which will be important if we go all in for a starter. His wildness will make our blood boil but he still has the swing and miss stuff and obviously a ton of playoff experience. Maybe Beeks from COL? Another lefty bullpen rental.
    • I was against the idea of a Crochet addition before the Bradish injury because I didn’t see the need. Now, I’m all for it. He would be a gamble but a much better buy than Luzardo who is not pitching well at all this season. He (Luzardo) would be the kind of non-impact move that we tried last year, that blew up in our faces.  On the other hand Robert is more of a luxury move than a need. IMO the needs are now top end starting pitcher (#2/3 type) AND shut down reliever. Anything addition beyond that is gravy. The priorities are pitching.
    • I think a RH bat is all we need offensively. I’d look at JD Martinez. 
    • How do other teams have ANY leverage? It’s not like Elias is forced to deal with them. If he was only dealing with one yea they would have leverage because the Orioles have a need on the roster. But because there are MULTIPLE with MULTIPLE players he can move on from any team and they will get nothing from us. Those other teams are incentivized to move their players JUST AS MUCH as we are incentivized to add. NOBODY is getting Westburg (or even asking for him at this point) or ANY OTHER MAINSTAY Major Leaguer of the roster. That’s not how the trade deadline works. As I mentioned nobody is going to the Yankees and saying give us Gil, Soto, Judge, Rodon, etc. Nobody is asking the Dodgers for Betts, Freeman, Ohtani, etc. Teams who are rebuilding/selling are asking for prospects. Oakland and the Chicago White Sox are not one player or even one year away. Guys who are already established now (even young ones like Jordan Westburg) do nothing for them in their phase of rebuilding.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...