Jump to content

Chris Davis 2019 and beyond


Camden_yardbird

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 5.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

If I’m Elias, I work hard to salvage Davis but I never commit a 25 man spot to him until I see he’s at least fringe worthy of it. I assess him in Spring Training. If he’s not ready, he gets a mysterious Oblique injury, goes on the DL and reports to Sarasota for instructionals. I give that a few months and make the roster call then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LookinUp said:

If I’m Elias, I work hard to salvage Davis but I never commit a 25 man spot to him until I see he’s at least fringe worthy of it. I assess him in Spring Training. If he’s not ready, he gets a mysterious Oblique injury, goes on the DL and reports to Sarasota for instructionals. I give that a few months and make the roster call then.

I doubt Davis or the union would go along with that approach.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I want Davis to win the Triple Crown in 2019.    Short of that, if he hit like he did in 2017 (.215/.309/.423, 26 HR 61 RBI, -0.1 rWAR), I might still keep him in the hope of further improvement in 2020.    But another year like last year?   No way.

As always, the logical and correct approach. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Several posters have expressed their opinion on what they would like to see happen.   However, what fans want is not going to make anything happen.

I think the question is what do you think Elias is going to do about Davis.   He has said he has going to try to fix him.   What to you think that entails?   How long do you think Elias will try different approaches with Davis before he gives up and say Davis is what he is?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, wildcard said:

I doubt Davis or the union would go along with that approach.

Really? I think Davis would accept that given the fact he knows he’s stealing money at this point, particularly if he believes in a plan to rebuild his swing. I’m not talking about some demeaning roster move. I’m talking about creating and executing a plan aimed at saving the guy’s career.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, wildcard said:

Several posters have expressed their opinion on what they would like to see happen.   However, what fans want is not going to make anything happen.

I think the question is what do you think Elias is going to do about Davis.   He has said he has going to try to fix him.   What to you think that entails?   How long do you think Elias will try different approaches with Davis before he gives up and say Davis is what he is?

A lot of prayer.

At this point I think it's Davis' best shot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LookinUp said:

Really? I think Davis would accept that given the fact he knows he’s stealing money at this point, particularly if he believes in a plan to rebuild his swing. I’m not talking about some demeaning roster move. I’m talking about creating and executing a plan aimed at saving the guy’s career.

If Davis were to agree to breaking the rules and cheating the system I don't see why the Union would get involved.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, LookinUp said:

If I’m Elias, I work hard to salvage Davis but I never commit a 25 man spot to him until I see he’s at least fringe worthy of it. I assess him in Spring Training. If he’s not ready, he gets a mysterious Oblique injury, goes on the DL and reports to Sarasota for instructionals. I give that a few months and make the roster call then.

Davis would never, EVER, have a mysterious oblique injury at this point. I think he looks for a release. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, wildcard said:

Several posters have expressed their opinion on what they would like to see happen.   However, what fans want is not going to make anything happen.

I think the question is what do you think Elias is going to do about Davis.   He has said he has going to try to fix him.   What to you think that entails?   How long do you think Elias will try different approaches with Davis before he gives up and say Davis is what he is?

First, in terms of exactly what he’ll do, I have no idea.    He may have some suggestions both from and analytics point of view and just from a scouting approach.    He may have ideas for a good swing doctor for Davis.   

In terms of how long he’ll try to get Davis fixed, it depends how badly he’s broken.    He could improve from last year and still be sub-replacement, he could be no better, or he could be even worse (hard to fathom, but we’re talking about a guy who has gotten worse 3 years in a row).    I think if he stagnates or gets worse he’ll be gone sometime this season.   If he improves but is still sub-replacement there’s a chance Elias will be more patient.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, LookinUp said:

Really? I think Davis would accept that given the fact he knows he’s stealing money at this point, particularly if he believes in a plan to rebuild his swing. I’m not talking about some demeaning roster move. I’m talking about creating and executing a plan aimed at saving the guy’s career.

Scott Boras.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

Why would Boras seek to increase the onerousness of the Davis contract?  If anything it would simply further decrease the chances of his other clients getting similar deals.

Thinking that Davis could be coerced into a fake injury report is the wacky idea here. Not Boras making a stand for player rights. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Why does everybody want to jump and label a kid so fast? What is this, his 2nd major-league season? Yes, certainly they shouldn't go into next year thinking he's a lock for 30+ starts and 180-200 innings but we can't say he's already reached his peak either. 
    • And their defense is very good. To put things in perspective, the Tigers collective dWAR is +0.5. The Orioles is -2.8. Minnesota -4.1, Yankees -0.3, Houston -0.1, Seattle +2.0, Royals at +2.5. The Royals really standout as most of that value is driven by Fermin (catcher) and Witt.  But I think my point is that the Tigers have excellent pitching (starting pitching and bullpen) as well as excellent defense. And they're not putrid with the bats.  I would say the one saving grace about the Tigers is they don't run much. 
    • We could have easily swept Detroit in Baltimore, the lineup we have now is not the lineup they faced. It doesn't matter who the opponent is, just win.
    • Both of them are important to consider here. They could have a mediocre offense every single game of the season, but if the pitching is elite (and it is!), it'll carry them.  We have 6 games against the Tigers this year. And yes, most of them were without the cadre of regulars. But here are the offensive numbers against them: .211/.282/.392 - .674 OPS They scored 20 runs in 6 games against them. Barely scraping 3 R/G. And a good portion of them coming in *1* game.  Out of the WC potentials the O's could face, here are their R/G: Royals: 29 in 6 games = 4.8 R/G Twins: 22 in 3 = 7.3 R/G Mariners: 27 in 6 = 4.5 R/G Tigers: 20 in 6 = 3.3 R/G Out of all the playoff teams, the best RA/G are the Mariners (3.75), Guardians (3.85), and Tigers (4.96). For the playoffs, you want to look at who you're facing on the bump. Which team scares you the most? Because if you can't hit against the team, it doesn't matter what the opposing offense is.  Also you'll want to consider the best fielding teams, too.   Seems to me you'd want to face the team you matchup best against *and* who has the worst defense and worst pitching, because presumably your 3 starters (Burnes, Eflin, Kremer) should be able to hold teams in check. 
    • I'd prefer Detroit - they've been so hot for so long they should be due to cool off. KC has been just the opposite. 
    • I'd say the Royals...pitch around Witt and Salvy Perez who seems to have had our number in recent years.  The rest of their lineup isn't too imposing. Wacha  -a guy I wanted this offseason and was laughed at for wanting him- has a 2.64 ERA over his last 15 starts.  He's the soft-tossing type that gives our lineup fits and, IIRC, he was great against us earlier this year.  Lugo has had a great year, so has Ragans.  Their starters are good. But they're 3-7 over their last 10 while the Tigers are 8-2.  A lot of the postseason, IMO, is catching teams at the right/wrong time.  This could all change by next week but the Tigers are hot, the Royals are not... Then again, I said I wanted to face Texas in the first round last year and look what happened.  So who knows.  
    • Would much rather face KC and to me it’s not close.    game 1 agains Skubal is an L. They’ve proven they can beat us with a bullpen game, a bullpen only behind CLE as best in the AL.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...