Jump to content

Rylan Bannon 2019


Frobby

Recommended Posts

Infielder Rylan Bannon, 23, hasn’t hit much in the Arizona Fall League, slashing .197/.256/.254 in 18 games with the Surprise Saguaros before last night. But 2019 has been a very good year.

Bannon, obtained from the Dodgers in the Manny Machado trade, batted .317/.344/.549 with 10 doubles, three home runs and 17 RBIs in 20 games with Triple-A Norfolk after moving up from Bowie on Aug. 13.

A scout from another organization who watched Bannon at Bowie compared him to Dodgers infielder Justin Turner “at the same stage.”

That alone should grab your attention.

“He’s a tough, strong, athletic baseball rat,” the scout said. “High intensity with lots of intangibles. Both his bat and glove have made mega strides. He’s much better defensively at third base than second base. He shortened his stroke and is hitting the ball with authority. His power is coming.”

https://www.masnsports.com/school-of-roch/2019/10/this-that-and-the-other-189.html

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Frobby said:

Infielder Rylan Bannon, 23, hasn’t hit much in the Arizona Fall League, slashing .197/.256/.254 in 18 games with the Surprise Saguaros before last night. But 2019 has been a very good year.

Bannon, obtained from the Dodgers in the Manny Machado trade, batted .317/.344/.549 with 10 doubles, three home runs and 17 RBIs in 20 games with Triple-A Norfolk after moving up from Bowie on Aug. 13.

A scout from another organization who watched Bannon at Bowie compared him to Dodgers infielder Justin Turner “at the same stage.”

That alone should grab your attention.

“He’s a tough, strong, athletic baseball rat,” the scout said. “High intensity with lots of intangibles. Both his bat and glove have made mega strides. He’s much better defensively at third base than second base. He shortened his stroke and is hitting the ball with authority. His power is coming.”

https://www.masnsports.com/school-of-roch/2019/10/this-that-and-the-other-189.html

Wow, that would be a first I've heard anyone even remotely come up with that comp. 

Let's look at the numbers.

At 23 years old

Bannon (AA):  .255/.345/.394/.740 in 444 PAs with 47/72 BB/K ratio 
Turner (AA): .289/.359/.432/.792 in in 323 PAs with 33/54 BB/K ratio

Now, we have to remember that Justin Turner had an amazing and unorthodox jump in power and production at the age of 29 years old so it's tough to use his minor league comps.

Bannon of course hit well with the super balls being used in AAA, but did not face a lot of the same teams much so word didn't get around on how to pitch him. Over his last 42 games at AA he slashed .214/.313/.372/.686 in 166 PAs, as teams learned they could pitch him up in the zone and induce pop ups and fly outs. 

Bannon does hit lefties well, but he's been pretty ordinary against righties where he slashed .258/.327/.388/.716 in 386 PAs in AA this year. 

Saying that, Turner has similar splits during his AA season at 23. 

I'd be more apt to believe that Bannon can become the pre-LA version of Turner (.260/.323/.361/.684) at the major league level more than the All-Star version.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks, Tony.   I don’t think anyone watching Turner in the minors thought he’d become what he became.    He’s just a classic case of how you never know for sure how and when a player will develop, and a rare case.    I don’t see how anyone could “expect” Bannon to develop in a similar way.    I agree that matching the “old” Turner is more realistic.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Thanks, Tony.   I don’t think anyone watching Turner in the minors thought he’d become what he became.    He’s just a classic case of how you never know for sure how and when a player will develop, and a rare case.    I don’t see how anyone could “expect” Bannon to develop in a similar way.    I agree that matching the “old” Turner is more realistic.  

That's why I think that's a very disingenuous statement by the "scout". 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Tony-OH said:

Wow, that would be a first I've heard anyone even remotely come up with that comp. 

Let's look at the numbers.

At 23 years old

Bannon (AA):  .255/.345/.394/.740 in 444 PAs with 47/72 BB/K ratio 
Turner (AA): .289/.359/.432/.792 in in 323 PAs with 33/54 BB/K ratio

Now, we have to remember that Justin Turner had an amazing and unorthodox jump in power and production at the age of 29 years old so it's tough to use his minor league comps.

Bannon of course hit well with the super balls being used in AAA, but did not face a lot of the same teams much so word didn't get around on how to pitch him. Over his last 42 games at AA he slashed .214/.313/.372/.686 in 166 PAs, as teams learned they could pitch him up in the zone and induce pop ups and fly outs. 

Bannon does hit lefties well, but he's been pretty ordinary against righties where he slashed .258/.327/.388/.716 in 386 PAs in AA this year. 

Saying that, Turner has similar splits during his AA season at 23. 

I'd be more apt to believe that Bannon can become the pre-LA version of Turner (.260/.323/.361/.684) at the major league level more than the All-Star version.

I agree completely that it’s irresponsible to use Turner as a comp because he had a ridiculous late blooming power surge. 

I will say regarding the AA stats at age 23, despite the lower OPS, Bannon performed better when compared to league average. 120 wRC+ vs 113 wRC+ for Turner. Bannon performed 20% better than league average in AA and 20% better than league average in AAA, which shows the huge discrepancy in league wide offense.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Luke-OH said:

I agree completely that it’s irresponsible to use Turner as a comp because he had a ridiculous late blooming power surge. 

I will say regarding the AA stats at age 23, despite the lower OPS, Bannon performed better when compared to league average. 120 wRC+ vs 113 wRC+ for Turner. Bannon performed 20% better than league average in AA and 20% better than league average in AAA, which shows the huge discrepancy in league wide offense.

Good points, but I'd expect you take up for your boy! :D

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I completely agree with this.  Most of this damage has already been done.  Travel teams have ruined many kids and have left others far more susceptible to injury in the minors and majors.  
    • I only heard Mel Proctor when he was working the Rangers games, and I really liked him. I don’t remember whether he worked with Dick Risenhoover or Mark Holtz, but I think he worked with Mark Holtz, although he was on his own for a little while, but I really liked him.
    • Just getting caught up here, so my first reaction to trading JW is NOOOOOO! However, I think most people around baseball would have to agree that he's a dude. He's become my favorite Oriole just because of his approach at the plate and also his workman-like attitude. Leaving out my preferences and putting on my front office hat I have to admit he would be attractive to other teams for his ability to play three positions in the IF and his steady performance with the bat. And unlike Holliday, he's proven himself.  While Holliday is the more high profile guy to other teams I'm not sure he's seen as more valuable. JW can play SS-has the arm for it-and he's versatile. I think Holliday could learn to play 2B but has neither the arm for 3B or SS. He likely has more range and as earlier stated by another poster, some team may want to try him at SS. Maybe that works, maybe it doesn't.  I feel like I'm making the case to keep JW and trade JH. Back to the question, which guy gets the Orioles what they need to be the favorite going into the playoffs? Number one pick or a guy who's a ML starter right now? Let's set that aside, maybe it's either one. Can either of them get us Skubal in the right package? Yes. That's the guy who IS a ML pitcher and who will move the needle. What's the package? Elias has earned some level of baseball knowledge with the Burnes trade and the trade that sent Bundy to the Angels when Elias first arrived. That one was even more evidence of his ability to read the tea leaves. So, I trust he'll make it work. I may not like the immediate results (i.e. trading Westy or Kjerstad), but if he can get Skubal in the right deal I'd make the deal. But Scherzer is a good back up and won't cost nearly as much.
    • 39 Yacqui Rivera - he was the PTBNL in the Scott/Sulser deal along with the comp pick.  Juan Nunez - he was the 3rd piece in the Jorge Lopez trade with the Twins along with Povich/Cano/4th piece
    • Yes of course, that was a typo. Westburg at 3B and Mayo at 1B
    • Matt Olson comes to mind but yes an extension is not relevant to the conversation.
    • One game or series at a time. Keep the players fresh with an off day with rotating basis . This summer heat is no joke 
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...