Jump to content

Projected Orioles 2020 Opening Day Payroll (ODP)


AZRon

Recommended Posts

26 minutes ago, weams said:

I assume that GMs in modern baseball have the same tools available that Dierkes does and use them to do their evaluations. I guess there are still a few dinosaurs that pay any attention to press.media. 

I agree that the GM have the same tools as Dierkes and they will probably come up with the same numbers.  But that is not the whole story.

Because of the juiced ball the  formula that was used in previous years is invalid for 2019.   The juiced ball made balls that would have been caught on the warning track  homers in 2019.   

If the MLB de-juices the ball in 2020 does that mean salaries should go down?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, wildcard said:

I agree that the GM have the same tools as Dierkes and they will probably come up with the same numbers.  But that is not the whole story.

Because of the juiced ball the  formula that was used in previous years is invalid for 2019.   The juiced ball made balls that would have been caught on the warning track  homers in 2019.   

If the MLB de-juices the ball in 2020 does that mean salaries should go down?

 

Of course not. THis is a legal process, collectively bargained. Whimsy has no place in ti. It's a math problem. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, weams said:

Of course not. THis is a legal process, collectively bargained. Whimsy has no place in ti. It's a math problem. 

You actually think that a the clubs are not going to have the juiced ball as a part to their presentation  to the arbitrator is the case of a hitter?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, wildcard said:

You actually think that a the clubs are not going to have the juiced ball as a part to their presentation  to the arbitrator is the case of a hitter?

I think that is  not even a possibility.  The baseball run environment will be discussed as are all analytics. Most of the judicial factors are the standard ones. Even pitcher wins and batting average. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, weams said:

Dierkes has been wrong before, but he is usually an industry accepted touchstone. I don't like it always, but he is.  This isn't a blog saying this.  

Two years ago he projected $6.8 mm for Gausman.    I said that was too high.    Gausman settled at $5.6 mm.    He’s not wrong every time, and he’s usually pretty on target, but he’s wrong here, IMO.    Villar might do better than the $8.8 mm I projected, but I’ll bet my guess is significantly closer than his.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Frobby said:

Two years ago he projected $6.8 mm for Gausman.    I said that was too high.    Gausman settled at $5.6 mm.    He’s not wrong every time, and he’s usually pretty on target, but he’s wrong here, IMO.    Villar might do better than the $8.8 mm I projected, but I’ll bet my guess is significantly closer than theirs.    

Might Gausman have won if he played? I personally don't think he would have. I do not think those numbers are based on settling, only trial. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Two years ago he projected $6.8 mm for Gausman.    I said that was too high.    Gausman settled at $5.6 mm.    He’s not wrong every time, and he’s usually pretty on target, but he’s wrong here, IMO.    Villar might do better than the $8.8 mm I projected, but I’ll bet my guess is significantly closer than theirs.    

I bet I will never know how clever you truly are on this one. Because I believe that Villar will settle with whatever club trades of his career year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, weams said:

Might Gausman have won if he played? I personally don't think he would have. I do not think those numbers are based on settling, only trial. 

90% of the cases settle.    Dierkes makes these projections before the bid and the ask are known, so I don’t see how he can be projecting what will happen at trial.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

An interesting thought from the guaranteed salary that Chris Davis holds.  If we cut him, we all know it's a sunk cost.  But opening up another roster spot would mean another 572k player, adding to the budget (not the payroll exactly, but overall outlay of resources). 

Crazy that they could trade Mancini, Givens, Bundy, Villar and be about 47mill and 37mill (78.7%) be from 2 players that have 0 to negative value. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Updated the roster projection for all transactions through 12/2/2020.
See opening post

Projected 2020 Opening Day Payroll (ODP) is now $66M. Last year's ODP was $82.12.

As to 2019 full season player compensation, according to the linked source below, the Orioles at 80.8M, ranked 27th ahead of the Pirates, Marlins and Rays; and had, by far, the largest percentage reduction in year over year compensation at -45.6%.
https://legacy.baseballprospectus.com/compensation/index.php?cyear=2019&team=&pos=

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, AZRon said:

Updated the roster projection for all transactions through 12/2/2020.
See opening post

Projected 2020 Opening Day Payroll (ODP) is now $66M. Last year's ODP was $82.12.

As to 2019 full season player compensation, according to the linked source below, the Orioles at 80.8M, ranked 27th ahead of the Pirates, Marlins and Rays; and had, by far, the largest percentage reduction in year over year compensation at -45.6%.
https://legacy.baseballprospectus.com/compensation/index.php?cyear=2019&team=&pos=

 

Thanks for the update.  

This does not change payroll but I see Mancini as the 1B and Davis on the bench.   I think Carroll is ahead of Fry, Tate and Kline.   Stewart begins the season on the DL, on rehab in the minors or optioned and Williams playing LF.   

Just thoughts.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, wildcard said:

Thanks for the update.  

This does not change payroll but I see Mancini as the 1B and Davis on the bench.   I think Carroll is ahead of Fry, Tate and Kline.   Stewart begins the season on the DL, on rehab in the minors or optioned and Williams playing LF.   

Just thoughts.

OK, but Williams is not currently on the 40 Man and, if he replaces an IL'ed Stewart, that would affect the total payroll figure. Thanks for your thoughts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, AZRon said:

OK, but Williams is not currently on the 40 Man and, if he replaces an IL'ed Stewart, that would affect the total payroll figure. Thanks for your thoughts.

I don't know whether Elias would burn an option which saves salary or IL Stewart but the early reports of his surgery sound like he will not be ready for OD.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I want to say, I thought the single he pulled on a good FB in on his hands was as impressive as the long homer he hit on a center cut FB.  Getting to those pitches in on the hands is tough.   Like I said though, I’d like to see more progress on change-ups and breaking stuff.    
    • I can appreciate where you are coming from. But the playoffs are more than luck. It’s about top talent performing against other teams top end talent. The Astros didn’t do all that winning because of luck (cheating aside lol). The Yankees teams of the mid to late 90’s were more than lucky.  We have the kind of talent (both on the field and in the front office) and we took the extreme tanking step in order to amass dynasty/multi-championship level run. Just simply making the playoffs and getting eliminated early, while you continue to be cheap and overly cautious (if that is what was to happen) will get old after awhile. There is a reason that the Rays and Guardians don’t have a significant fanbase/marketplace engagement for a reason (beyond being a small market). STL is a small market and the Padres were until recently, when their ownership changed and decided to spend to engage the marketplace and grow fan interest.
    • Did I hear Kevin Brown correctly today - did he say the average attendance across all games in the league yesterday (06/15) was north of 39K?  That is impressive,  if true. 
    • Another nice start, hope everything is good with the Burnes family.
    • How many pitchers do you think will be available that are also worth having?  How many other teams will also be after them?  There will be serious competition for the handful of players the Orioles have any use for and there's no indication that there's anything like a buyer's market out there. While it's technically true that Elias doesn't have to do anything, should the team continue to play at the current level and he decides to do nothing so he can continue to hug prospects, then I wouldn't want to be him if the O's get booted from the postseason as ingloriously as they were last season.  None of this means Elias has to make a dumb deal, but let's not pretend he's automatically in the driver's seat.
    • I don’t think anyone hates Cowser. Or dislikes him.    Criticism and pointing out flaws in someone’s game aren’t negatives. For me, Cowser has been one of the pleasant surprises of this year, but he does have his warts. He strikes out a lot and he looks prone to being in nasty slumps.    That doesn’t mean I hate the guy or I’m negative about him, but some struggle with nuance.    You can see where he can become a very good hitter and his defense is excellent. 
    • I'm guessing that would be Luis Robert Jr.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...