Jump to content

Kline and Wilkerson clear waivers


MurphDogg

Recommended Posts

29 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

He might which is why he should resign with the Orioles.   The difference between Wilkerson and 50 other guys in AAA is opportunity.    He has a better chance of getting another with the Orioles just based on the fact that they know him and he has ML experience with them.

Also, I don't see Smith as a reserve outfielder but I guess it's possible.    I think he either starts in LF, is the LH side of a platoon, or gets traded/released.

I expect Elias will make 2-3 more waiver claims between now and the end of ST.   Smith himself was picked up last year on March 8 (we traded international slots to get him).    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

A benefit to not having a lot of talent on the 40.

This is true. That’s why I’m a big proponent of the waiver wire game. We’re not going to participate in FA, but we can pick up players that are coming off deep 40 man rosters and give them a chance. 

Keep in mind our current 40 man has two rule 5 players on it and Chris Davis. 

Edited by sportsfan8703
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Frobby said:

Funny!    But I’m glad to have them as depth.    With Kline, we have to keep in mind that even though he’s 28, due to his past injuries he’s relatively inexperienced.   I think he still has potential for improvement.     

Yep that's how I meant it... but our talent level is really abysmal

I do like the Stevie Wilkerson story and would love to see Kline bounce back... but man o man this looks like a roster that could easily go past 110 losses

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, webbrick2010 said:

Yep that's how I meant it... but our talent level is really abysmal

I do like the Stevie Wilkerson story and would love to see Kline bounce back... but man o man this looks like a roster that could easily go past 110 losses

The 40 man roster is an odd way to evaluate organizational talent level. Our organizational talent level isn’t going to increase because next November we have to add 10+ prospects(not names we usually stew over) to the 40 man roster. 

We will see massive 40 man consolidation at the end of the year. It’s time for a lot of these guys to produce or get DFAd in November. 

Keep in mind that we could take lesser than expected returns on players like Mancini and Givens, and take basically anything we can get  for guys like Armstrong, Fry, Smith Jr, Stewart, Phillips, etc....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, interloper said:

3000 PAs over 14 seasons for a grand total of.... 

1.6 WAR.

That's craaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaazy. 

And Seattle actually brought him BACK at the end of his career and paid him close to $6 million over 2 years to do absolutely nothing in 202 ABs! Wow!

There is value in being able to sit the bench for weeks at a time without saying a word, and then going into play a credible shortstop on Tuesday, and RF on Thursday. Especially in a world of 7 specialist relievers and 2- or 3-man benches.

Personally I'd rather have a 6-man bench full of guys who can OPS .825 against lefties and a few plus-plus gloves.  But baseball has decided otherwise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, interloper said:

3000 PAs over 14 seasons for a grand total of.... 

1.6 WAR.

That's craaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaazy. 

And Seattle actually brought him BACK at the end of his career and paid him close to $6 million over 2 years to do absolutely nothing in 202 ABs! Wow!

He's 106th on the list of most PAs by a player with a career of less than 5 WAR. 

The record is Alfredo Griffin's 7331 in a career of 3.0 WAR.  Griffin played 18 seasons in the majors and had a .604 OPS, and by bb-ref's figuring was a -28 fielder.  After he turned 30 he had 2000 PAs of a .545.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

He's 106th on the list of most PAs by a player with a career of less than 5 WAR. 

The record is Alfredo Griffin's 7331 in a career of 3.0 WAR.  Griffin played 18 seasons in the majors and had a .604 OPS, and by bb-ref's figuring was a -28 fielder.  After he turned 30 he had 2000 PAs of a .545.

I bet he was a real dirt dog though!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, sportsfan8703 said:

The 40 man roster is an odd way to evaluate organizational talent level. Our organizational talent level isn’t going to increase because next November we have to add 10+ prospects(not names we usually stew over) to the 40 man roster. 

We will see massive 40 man consolidation at the end of the year. It’s time for a lot of these guys to produce or get DFAd in November. 

Keep in mind that we could take lesser than expected returns on players like Mancini and Givens, and take basically anything we can get  for guys like Armstrong, Fry, Smith Jr, Stewart, Phillips, etc....

10+ overstates it a little bit.

I would say there are 3 players that have a 95%+ chance of being added: Diaz, Lowther and Baumann.

3 players with a very good chance (75%+) of being added: Zimmermann, Bannon and Wells.

There are a few other guys with a chance like Pop, Mattson, McCoy, and Hanifee.

Then there are guys that were Rule 5 eligible this past year that could get added: Fenter, Peralta, Sedlock, Alvarado, Klimek, Cumberland, and Muckenhirn

I would be shocked if more than 10 of those players are added, I think it is more likely 8 or so. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MurphDogg said:

10+ overstates it a little bit.

I would say there are 3 players that have a 95%+ chance of being added: Diaz, Lowther and Baumann.

3 players with a very good chance (75%+) of being added: Zimmermann, Bannon and Wells.

There are a few other guys with a chance like Pop, Mattson, McCoy, and Hanifee.

Then there are guys that were Rule 5 eligible this past year that could get added: Fenter, Peralta, Sedlock, Alvarado, Klimek, Cumberland, and Muckenhirn

I would be shocked if more than 10 of those players are added, I think it is more likely 8 or so. 

I'm not talking about during the season.  I'm talking guys that will need to be added In November.  I'm usually on the side that we think too highly of our own guys, but I remember going through and it seemed like 10.  Maybe I need to look again.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

I'm not talking about during the season.  I'm talking guys that will need to be added In November.  I'm usually on the side that we think too highly of our own guys, but I remember going through and it seemed like 10.  Maybe I need to look again.  

So am I. That is the list of guys who need to be added by December or be exposed to the Rule 5 draft.

Feel free to peruse the Roster Resource depth chart. I don't think there is anyone else with a decent chance unless you want to throw in more AAA relievers like Flaa, Brian Gonzalez or Chleborad. Felix Bautista if he shoots through Frederick and Bowie.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, MurphDogg said:

So am I. That is the list of guys who need to be added by December or be exposed to the Rule 5 draft.

Feel free to peruse the Roster Resource depth chart. I don't think there is anyone else with a decent chance unless you want to throw in more AAA relievers like Flaa, Brian Gonzalez or Chleborad. Felix Bautista if he shoots through Frederick and Bowie.

Thanks.  I gave it a quick glance.  For some reason I think I assumed more.  I do agree that we usually over estimate.  Elias has done a good job so far in trades of bringing back players that don't present a 40 man roster dilemma.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Yea.  I feel the same way.  I really do not care strongly one way or another.  Sure, I think it's kind of ugly.  I also think HR's came pretty cheap before.  I like the exciting defensive plays it fosters and of course the random triple & odd carom make for some fun and unique moments.  But I don't think it helps or hurts the team in any substantial way short of helping out the pitching a little.   I sure don't think the players are changing their approaches.  If they keep it as is, that's fine with me.  If they modify it some way, that's fine with me as well.  It does seem like there is some opportunity for some unique seats down there by modifying it slightly.  When I first saw it, it almost appeared like a construction Phase 1.  That might be reasoning for pushing it back so far, allows them some flexibility in the future.   I also don't buy that a Free Agent RH hitter is going to care at all about the wall.   They are getting paid regardless.  I'd think that 1-maximizing payday 2-playing for a winner 3-finding a location that suits your family would be your priorities and your long-term stat line would be very close to the bottom of your list of concerns.  
    • His "ability to play RF" carries about $0 value
    • Yeah but if you think most of this money is going to upgrade things that are wrong or need improving, such as the ones @accinfo lists, I think you'll be disappointed.   They will be for new features, each one designed to create revenue via premium seating or premium "experience" areas or attractions that bring non baseball fans to the park to spend or sports betting related things. I'm not saying they won't fix some basic things that need it like upgrading the sound system or improving the point of sale technology.   I'm sure they will.   But the focus is going to be on the new attractions which are all designed with revenue enhancement in mind.
    • I’m not a lawyer … perhaps @Frobbymight know. Loss of income, future revenues? Damage to their franchise….Even with MASN the Orioles lost a ton on annual tv revenues
    • Congrats to the offense on playing a heck of a game. Lamar was incredible to watch, especially the play when the snap ended up on the ground and he had to run away towards the sideline and still found Likely for the score. It's very frustrating to me that the offense HAD to play so well because of the poor coaching and abysmal defensive play.  It's odd to me that Harbaugh still messes up timeout usage after being a coach in the league for over 15 years.
    • Can someone in 150 words or less explain to me what DYAR is?
    • I have a 3 hour round trip to get to games. I can't speak about other directions, but the stadium is very easy to get to from the south...some more traffic with the earlier start times, but overall - games are VERY easy to get to, imo. You don't have the hike through the city to get to games. I'm a rural guy, and it's really not a big deal. We took the light rail from Cromwell for Game 1 (I usually park in BC or FGH) and it was a breeze. We walked out right after the game, and we immediately caught a direct bus that took us back to Cromwell directly. We did the same thing last year. I gotta be honest - I think the "they've been horrible for half the season" reasoning is pretty lame. Even when they were down (and dealing with significant injuries) after the AS break, they were still essentially a lock to make the playoffs. Then they get healthy-ish with some key guys back riiiiight before the playoffs and look great for a couple of series - but I guess it was too late for everyone?  Come on.  Just say you didn't feel like it. But don't blame August play for not showing up in October.   
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...