Jump to content

Adley so far: 0-8, 1 walk, 5 Ks


interloper

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, spiritof66 said:

I'm with Tony on The Natural, but feel the same way about Field of Dreams. They're not about anything that I (recognize as baseball.

For me, the best baseball movie (that I've seen) is Bang the Drum Slowly. Great acting (De Niro, Michael Moriarty, Danny Aiello; Vincent Gardenia steals the show though I guess De Niro reclaims it by the end), unforgettable characters and subplots, and a story that is sometimes heartwarming, other times heartbreaking. And the baseball is real baseball. But you don't have to take my word for it. Reviewing it in 1973, Roger Ebert said, "It’s mostly about baseball and the daily life of a major league club on the road." Ebert called it "the ultimate baseball movie," and for me it still is. https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/bang-the-drum-slowly-1973  

One of life's great unsolved mysteries is why no one has made a film, or a TV mini-series, of Mark Harris's other baseball fiction, especially The Southpaw, in which Harris introduced the characters in Bang the Drum Slowly. 

They thought at the time that Moriarty was going to be the  big star. Better looking and taller then De Niro. Actually did a TV version in 1956 on something called the

"United States Steel Hour . Paul Newman and Albert Salmi were the stars. George Peppard was also in it as Piney Woods. 

First published in early 1956, Mark Harris's baseball novel Bang the Drum Slowly was swiftly adapted for television; on September 24, 1956, a streamlined 60-minute version of the Harris novel was telecast live on The US Steel Hour. Paul Newman plays Henry Wiggen, a slang-happy, unabashedly self-promotional pitcher for the fictional New York Mammoths. Wiggen spends a great deal of his free time protecting his dimwitted roomate, catcher Bruce Pearson (Albert Salmi), from being dropped from the team. It's not that Henry is overly fond of Bruce; it's simply that he knows (but the rest of the team doesn't) that Bruce is dying of Hodgkin's disease

This TV adaptation remains faithful to the first-person singular style of the novel by having Henry periodically step "out" of the drama to address the audience: this device is most effective at the finale when, after tearfully recalling the "ragging" he often gave his now-deceased teammate, Henry sobs "From here on, I rag nobody." A very young George Peppard appears as Piney Woods, the country-boy ballplayer who sings the ballad from which the drama's title is derived

 

https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/bang_the_drum_slowly_1956

 

 

Also changed the end of the Natural from the book. People like happy endings and if Redford struck out like in the book,no big ending.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How about the 2016 movie "Undrafted"?  I'm not saying it's Bull Durham, but it's a sleeper (or, out of left field).  Interesting take on summer league ball, what do you do if your dream doesn't quite happen.  And, one of the executive producers is Tony Romo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Going Underground said:

Also changed the end of the Natural from the book. People like happy endings and if Redford struck out like in the book,no big ending.

Read the book and loved it.    Somehow, it didn’t bother me that they had the opposite ending in the movie.    Would’ve been a real bummer to leave the movie theater with a sour taste in your mouth.     The movie is quite faithful to the book to that point and then just heads in a totally different direction.    But I love the way the movie captured the times, the use of music, and portrayal of the the big moments in the games.     For me it’s pitch perfect moviemaking.    It’s about baseball but bigger.   

Back on topic, I’m fully expecting Rutschman to destroy a light tower with one of his homers.    
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Frobby said:

I took it for granted.   I took a lot of things for granted in those days.    The late ‘80’s were a total shock to my system.     I’d just assumed the Orioles would contend forever and everything would continue to go right for them.     Imagine being an Orioles fan after the 1983 season.    You’ve had a great team for 20+ years, won three World Series and had eight playoff appearances in that time, and you have a 27-year old Eddie Murray and a 23-year old Cal Ripken.     Why in the world would you expect anything other than that the team would continue to be great?    But as Drungo pointed out, the ship was rotting below the water line.   

I was eight years old in 1979.  So my formative years of sports fandom involved the Orioles being among the best teams in baseball every year until I was about 15.  I had no clue the farm was barren, or that the Orioles' business model was firmly planted in 1955.  Every radio and TV broadcast talked about the Oriole Way being the model for all other teams to emulate.  Then the whole thing fell apart, and it's only been sporadically good since.  But they hooked me when I was 9-15, and there was no going back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Frobby said:

Read the book and loved it.    Somehow, it didn’t bother me that they had the opposite ending in the movie.    Would’ve been a real bummer to leave the movie theater with a sour taste in your mouth.     The movie is quite faithful to the book to that point and then just heads in a totally different direction.    But I love the way the movie captured the times, the use of music, and portrayal of the the big moments in the games.     For me it’s pitch perfect moviemaking.    It’s about baseball but bigger.   

Back on topic, I’m fully expecting Rutschman to destroy a light tower with one of his homers.    
 

I've long thought that someone like Tim Burton (or even better, Werner Herzog) should reboot The Natural and stay much more faithful to the book.  Dark, bitter, with the lesson being that no matter how promising things look, it will probably go very wrong.  Maybe the Orioles should be the team instead of the Knights!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

I've long thought that someone like Tim Burton (or even better, Werner Herzog) should reboot The Natural and stay much more faithful to the book.  Dark, bitter, with the lesson being that no matter how promising things look, it will probably go very wrong.  Maybe the Orioles should be the team instead of the Knights!

Christopher Nolan directed then they would be the Dark Knights.Batman as Roy Hobbs. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Frobby said:

Read the book and loved it.    Somehow, it didn’t bother me that they had the opposite ending in the movie.    Would’ve been a real bummer to leave the movie theater with a sour taste in your mouth.     The movie is quite faithful to the book to that point and then just heads in a totally different direction.    But I love the way the movie captured the times, the use of music, and portrayal of the the big moments in the games.     For me it’s pitch perfect moviemaking.    It’s about baseball but bigger.   

Back on topic, I’m fully expecting Rutschman to destroy a light tower with one of his homers.    
 

I preferred the book to the movie for Field of Dreams as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Never did read that book, though I read a book of short stories by Kinsella called The Thrill of the Grass that’s quite good. 

I also enjoyed this one from him.

https://www.amazon.com/Iowa-Baseball-Confederacy-W-Kinsella-ebook/dp/B07XD75QJM/ref=sr_1_1?keywords=wp+kinsella&qid=1583530490&s=digital-text&sr=1-1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

I preferred the book to the movie for Field of Dreams as well.

I may have liked The Iowa Baseball Confederacy better than Shoeless Joe.  But it's been 20+ years since I read either.  Maybe 30.  Something about a 6,000 inning game that lasted for months though epic storms and supernatural events.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

I may have liked The Iowa Baseball Confederacy better than Shoeless Joe.  But it's been 20+ years since I read either.  Maybe 30.  Something about a 6,000 inning game that lasted for months though epic storms and supernatural events.

Same for me honestly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Now a HBP.  BS rally.  
    • I don’t even know how to keep up with this post.  From day one, I always said I expected one 55 FV and one 50 FV for Cease plus an interesting third piece.  My hypothetical for you guys was one of Cowser or Kjerstad plus Ortiz plus an interesting third piece (not even a top 10 guy given strength of your system).  We ended up getting a 55 FV pitcher in Thorpe, a 50 FV pitcher in Iriarte, a 45 FV prospect in Zavala, and an interesting controllable reliever.  This is definitely less than what I wanted from you guys as positional prospects are worth more than pitching prospects, but generally speaking it’s a similar construct.  For some reason though, you use Pipeline as the Bible for prospects who happened to be the lowest on these guys.  And you also view a guy as being a top 100 or not a top 100 prospect, when there are lots of 50 FV prospects who don’t make the cut and are directionally the same value. Regardless, I don’t know what this has to do with your absurd Crochet + Robert proposal.  Like no way in hell is Luis Robert worth that little.  Norby is a RH, all bat prospect who has regressed some in his latest go around in AAA.  His value is much lower than you think it is.  And while I do like Bradfield, the dude isn’t an exactly lighting it on fire in High A (his wRC+ is less than Zavala’s, the guy you were just ripping, despite being three years older at the same level).  It’s a laughable offer for a guy who may be the best positional player at the deadline and who will have 3 1/3 years of control left.  He are way too focused on BA or something if you think that could land him.
    • I like reading the posts of @SteveA in the game thread. Always well-considered, with some substance and often some quick off-the-cuff research. Not to say that I’m always 100% in agreement, but it’s always a thinking man’s contribution to the game thread.
    • It was a way different game back then.  Starters went 300 innings a year.  
    • Thoroughly enjoyed that. Not a clue what she’s saying and don’t care. How fun
    • 8 pitchers on the roster for a season.   You can see 8 pitch one game some nights.  
    • Ugh. 4 pitch walk, really?
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...